{"title":"不同肥厚性心肌病队列中ACC/AHA和ESC心源性猝死风险指南的验证:分层HCM研究","authors":"Murillo Oliveira Antunes, Fabio Fernandes, Edmundo Arteaga-Fernandez, Félix José Alvarez Ramires, Vinicius Machado Correia, Juliano Novaes Cardoso, Cristhian Espinoza Romero, Henrique Martins Sousa, Marília Taily Soliani, Matheus Ramos Ramos Dal Piaz, Anna Danielle Rodrigues Gandarella, Ruiza Gonçalves Rocha Teixeira, Charles Mady, Caio Assis Moura Tavares, Patricia O Guimarães, Vagner Madrini Junior","doi":"10.5334/gh.1380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major concern in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different guidelines for SCD risk stratification. Their comparative performance in diverse populations remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for SCD stratification in a Brazilian cohort with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HCM who were followed in a dedicated clinic at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. The primary outcome was SCD, aborted cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT), an episode of VF or SVT, or appropriate ICD therapy. Risk prediction models were assessed using the C-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 187 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines classified 106 (56%) patients as high-risk for SCD, while the 2014 ESC guidelines identified 54 (29%). The primary outcome occurred in 12% of the high-risk group identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines and 13% of the high-risk group identified by the ESC guidelines. Both guidelines showed low discriminatory power for SCD risk in this Brazilian cohort, with AUC values of 0.634 and 0.581 for the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations in predicting SCD events and defining ICD indications in Brazilian HCM patients. Further studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize SCD prevention in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":56018,"journal":{"name":"Global Heart","volume":"19 1","pages":"94"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661054/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of ACC/AHA and ESC Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Guidelines in Diverse Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Cohort: Stratification HCM Study.\",\"authors\":\"Murillo Oliveira Antunes, Fabio Fernandes, Edmundo Arteaga-Fernandez, Félix José Alvarez Ramires, Vinicius Machado Correia, Juliano Novaes Cardoso, Cristhian Espinoza Romero, Henrique Martins Sousa, Marília Taily Soliani, Matheus Ramos Ramos Dal Piaz, Anna Danielle Rodrigues Gandarella, Ruiza Gonçalves Rocha Teixeira, Charles Mady, Caio Assis Moura Tavares, Patricia O Guimarães, Vagner Madrini Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/gh.1380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major concern in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different guidelines for SCD risk stratification. Their comparative performance in diverse populations remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for SCD stratification in a Brazilian cohort with HCM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HCM who were followed in a dedicated clinic at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. The primary outcome was SCD, aborted cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT), an episode of VF or SVT, or appropriate ICD therapy. Risk prediction models were assessed using the C-index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 187 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines classified 106 (56%) patients as high-risk for SCD, while the 2014 ESC guidelines identified 54 (29%). The primary outcome occurred in 12% of the high-risk group identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines and 13% of the high-risk group identified by the ESC guidelines. Both guidelines showed low discriminatory power for SCD risk in this Brazilian cohort, with AUC values of 0.634 and 0.581 for the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations in predicting SCD events and defining ICD indications in Brazilian HCM patients. Further studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize SCD prevention in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Heart\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661054/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1380\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Heart","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/gh.1380","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validation of ACC/AHA and ESC Sudden Cardiac Death Risk Guidelines in Diverse Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Cohort: Stratification HCM Study.
Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a major concern in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) have different guidelines for SCD risk stratification. Their comparative performance in diverse populations remains uncertain.
Objective: Evaluate the performance of the 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines for SCD stratification in a Brazilian cohort with HCM.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with HCM who were followed in a dedicated clinic at a tertiary hospital in Brazil. The primary outcome was SCD, aborted cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF), sustained ventricular tachycardia (SVT), an episode of VF or SVT, or appropriate ICD therapy. Risk prediction models were assessed using the C-index.
Results: A total of 187 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 8.3 years. The 2020 ACC/AHA guidelines classified 106 (56%) patients as high-risk for SCD, while the 2014 ESC guidelines identified 54 (29%). The primary outcome occurred in 12% of the high-risk group identified by the ACC/AHA guidelines and 13% of the high-risk group identified by the ESC guidelines. Both guidelines showed low discriminatory power for SCD risk in this Brazilian cohort, with AUC values of 0.634 and 0.581 for the ACC/AHA and ESC guidelines, respectively.
Conclusions: The 2020 ACC/AHA and 2014 ESC guidelines have limitations in predicting SCD events and defining ICD indications in Brazilian HCM patients. Further studies are needed to refine risk stratification and optimize SCD prevention in this population.
Global HeartMedicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍:
Global Heart offers a forum for dialogue and education on research, developments, trends, solutions and public health programs related to the prevention and control of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) worldwide, with a special focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Manuscripts should address not only the extent or epidemiology of the problem, but also describe interventions to effectively control and prevent CVDs and the underlying factors. The emphasis should be on approaches applicable in settings with limited resources.
Economic evaluations of successful interventions are particularly welcome. We will also consider negative findings if important. While reports of hospital or clinic-based treatments are not excluded, particularly if they have broad implications for cost-effective disease control or prevention, we give priority to papers addressing community-based activities. We encourage submissions on cardiovascular surveillance and health policies, professional education, ethical issues and technological innovations related to prevention.
Global Heart is particularly interested in publishing data from updated national or regional demographic health surveys, World Health Organization or Global Burden of Disease data, large clinical disease databases or registries. Systematic reviews or meta-analyses on globally relevant topics are welcome. We will also consider clinical research that has special relevance to LMICs, e.g. using validated instruments to assess health-related quality-of-life in patients from LMICs, innovative diagnostic-therapeutic applications, real-world effectiveness clinical trials, research methods (innovative methodologic papers, with emphasis on low-cost research methods or novel application of methods in low resource settings), and papers pertaining to cardiovascular health promotion and policy (quantitative evaluation of health programs.