一项前瞻性研究,比较高质量的分子肿瘤板和人工智能驱动的软件作为医疗设备。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Hideaki Bando, Yoichi Naito, Tomoyuki Yamada, Takao Fujisawa, Mitsuho Imai, Yasutoshi Sakamoto, Yusuke Saigusa, Kouji Yamamoto, Yutaka Tomioka, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Kuniko Sunami, Megumi Futamura, Chiemi Notake, Satoko Aoki, Kazunori Okano, Takayuki Yoshino
{"title":"一项前瞻性研究,比较高质量的分子肿瘤板和人工智能驱动的软件作为医疗设备。","authors":"Hideaki Bando, Yoichi Naito, Tomoyuki Yamada, Takao Fujisawa, Mitsuho Imai, Yasutoshi Sakamoto, Yusuke Saigusa, Kouji Yamamoto, Yutaka Tomioka, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Kuniko Sunami, Megumi Futamura, Chiemi Notake, Satoko Aoki, Kazunori Okano, Takayuki Yoshino","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the \"Registry of the Academia Assembly,\" based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"172-179"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective study comparing highly qualified Molecular Tumor Boards with AI-powered software as a medical device.\",\"authors\":\"Hideaki Bando, Yoichi Naito, Tomoyuki Yamada, Takao Fujisawa, Mitsuho Imai, Yasutoshi Sakamoto, Yusuke Saigusa, Kouji Yamamoto, Yutaka Tomioka, Nobuyoshi Takeshita, Kuniko Sunami, Megumi Futamura, Chiemi Notake, Satoko Aoki, Kazunori Okano, Takayuki Yoshino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the \\\"Registry of the Academia Assembly,\\\" based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"172-179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02684-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在日本,癌症精准医疗的实施与保险报销政策密切相关,需要由分子肿瘤委员会(MTBs)进行个案审查,这给医疗机构带来了相当大的运营负担。MTBs所需的大量准备和审查时间阻碍了他们有效评估全面基因组分析(CGP)测试结果的能力。尽管尝试优化MTB业务,但仍存在重大挑战。本研究旨在评估QA Commons的有效性,QA Commons是一个人工智能驱动的系统,旨在通过CGP分析改善治疗计划。QA Commons利用与遗传生物标志物相关的药物、监管批准和临床试验的综合知识库,从而能够提供一致和标准化的治疗建议。初步评估显示,QA Commons的建议与理想的治疗建议(共识注释)非常匹配,优于癌症基因组医学核心医院MTBs的平均结果。方法:通过将QA Commons的治疗建议与包括癌症基因组医学核心医院和枢纽医院的医学专业人员在内的学术会议的治疗建议进行比较,进行临床表现评估研究。根据明确的纳入和排除标准,将分析从“学术会议登记处”中选出的100个案例,以评估建议的一致性。结论:预期结果表明,QA Commons可以减少MTB成员的工作量,规范MTB讨论的质量,并在重复的患者咨询中提供一致的结果。此外,QA Commons的全球扩张可以促进全球采用日本开创性的精确肿瘤系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective study comparing highly qualified Molecular Tumor Boards with AI-powered software as a medical device.

Background: The implementation of cancer precision medicine in Japan is deeply intertwined with insurance reimbursement policies and requires case-by-case reviews by Molecular Tumor Boards (MTBs), which impose considerable operational burdens on healthcare facilities. The extensive preparation and review times required by MTBs hinder their ability to efficiently assess comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) test results. Despite attempts to optimize MTB operations, significant challenges remain. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of QA Commons, an artificial intelligence-driven system designed to improve treatment planning using CGP analysis. QA Commons utilizes a comprehensive knowledge base of drugs, regulatory approvals, and clinical trials linked to genetic biomarkers, thereby enabling the delivery of consistent and standardized treatment recommendations. Initial assessments revealed that the QA Commons' recommendations closely matched the ideal treatment recommendations (consensus annotations), outperforming the average results of MTBs at Cancer Genomic Medicine Core Hospitals.

Methods: A clinical performance evaluation study will be conducted by comparing the QA Commons' treatment recommendations with those of the Academia Assembly, which includes medical professionals from the Cancer Genomic Medicine Core and Hub Hospitals. One hundred cases selected from the "Registry of the Academia Assembly," based on defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, will be analyzed to assess the concordance of recommendations.

Conclusion: The expected outcomes suggest that QA Commons could reduce the workload of MTB members, standardize the quality of MTB discussions, and provide consistent outcomes in repeated patient consultations. In addition, the global expansion of QA Commons could promote worldwide adoption of Japan's pioneering precision oncology system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信