Alexandra C Dionne, Lawrence G Lenke, Fthimnir M Hassan, Chidebelum Nnake, Simon Blanchard, Justin L Reyes, Roy Miller, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar
{"title":"青少年与青年特发性脊柱侧凸患者:他们术后两年的影像学和临床结果有何不同?","authors":"Alexandra C Dionne, Lawrence G Lenke, Fthimnir M Hassan, Chidebelum Nnake, Simon Blanchard, Justin L Reyes, Roy Miller, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 ± 14.0 vs. -61.8 ± 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 ± 1.2 h vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 ± 5.4 vs. 29.7 ± 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 ± 13.6 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 ± 7.9 vs. 7.4 ± 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"625-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescent vs. Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: how different are their two year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes?\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra C Dionne, Lawrence G Lenke, Fthimnir M Hassan, Chidebelum Nnake, Simon Blanchard, Justin L Reyes, Roy Miller, Joseph M Lombardi, Zeeshan M Sardar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 ± 14.0 vs. -61.8 ± 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 ± 1.2 h vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 ± 5.4 vs. 29.7 ± 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 ± 13.6 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 ± 7.9 vs. 7.4 ± 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"625-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08621-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adolescent vs. Young Adult Idiopathic Scoliosis patients: how different are their two year postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes?
Purpose: To compare the long-term outcomes among AIS (10-18 years) and young AdIS (YAdIS) (19-40 years) patients with minimum 2 year follow up.
Methods: A retrospective review of AIS and YAdIS patients who underwent primary corrective surgery at a single center was conducted. Demographic, radiographic, operative data, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs), including the ODI and SRS-22r, and long-term complications were collected. A 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM) analysis was implemented to limit selection bias by controlling for gender, curve type, total instrumented levels (TIL), and main coronal cobb angle.
Results: 95 patients (60 AIS, 35 YAdIS) were identified. Following PSM, 27 matched pairs were identified. AIS patients had greater LL (-55.6 ± 14.0 vs. -61.8 ± 11.7, p = 0.0486) at preop, less OR time (4.7 ± 1.2 h vs. 5.2 ± 1.5 h, p = 0.0468), intraoperative transfusion rates (70.4% vs. 96.3%, p = 0.0082), and postop Hb (9.0 ± 1.9 vs. 10.1 ± 1.4, p = 0.0280) and Hct (26.4 ± 5.4 vs. 29.7 ± 3.7, p = 0.0453). YAdIS patients had greater T2-T12 TK (42.7 ± 13.6 vs. 36.3 ± 11.0, p = 0.0412), T2-T5 TK (19.4 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 8.7, p = 0.0187), and TPA (12.4 ± 7.9 vs. 7.4 ± 8.9, p = 0.0200). There were no significant differences in baseline and 2 year follow up PROMs and in the rates of 2 year complications, including proximal/distal junctional kyphosis (PJK/DJK), pseudarthrosis, rod fracture, curve progression, and revision (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: Despite differences in operative characteristics, idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients who underwent corrective surgery at a younger age had comparable PROMs and 2 year outcomes to older patients. Corrective fusion surgery is safe and effective in both adolescents and young adults and may avoid the higher complication rates seen in older adults.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe