{"title":"冲击波冠状动脉碎石术在冠状动脉内支架植入和其他结果:ISAR-WAVE试验的设计和基本原理。","authors":"Salvatore Cassese MD, PhD , Fiorenzo Simonetti MD , Hector Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias MD , Marion Janisch MD , Michael Joner MD , Sebastian Kufner MD , Tobias Lenz MD , Costanza Pellegrini MD , Tobias Rheude MD , Hendrik Sager MD , Heribert Schunkert MD , Fabian Starnecker MD , Felix Voll MD , Erion Xhepa MD, PhD , Adnan Kastrati MD , Thorsten Kessler MD","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions is limited by inadequate stent expansion and poor clinical outcomes. Over the past decade, several devices and techniques have been developed for calcium modification and lesion preparation. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool in this context. Although numerous observational studies have been reported on this technique, randomized trials powered for clinical outcomes on the relative merits of IVL in patients with severely calcified lesions are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Study design and objectives</h3><div>The ISAR-WAVE trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial. The aim is to test whether IVL is superior to other calcium-modifying techniques (modified or super high-pressure balloon and atheroablative devices) in <em>de novo</em> severely calcified coronary lesions. The study is planned to enroll 666 patients. The primary endpoint is the composite of major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization at 12 months. In addition to the individual components of the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints include also safety, quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ISAR-WAVE is a multicenter, randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that a strategy of IVL confers superior clinical performance compared to other calcium-modifying techniques in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for a <em>de novo</em> severely calcified coronary artery lesion.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClilicalTrial.gov, NCT06369142.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"282 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intracoronary stenting and additional results achieved by shockWAVE coronary lithotripsy: design and rationale of ISAR-WAVE trial\",\"authors\":\"Salvatore Cassese MD, PhD , Fiorenzo Simonetti MD , Hector Alfonso Alvarez Covarrubias MD , Marion Janisch MD , Michael Joner MD , Sebastian Kufner MD , Tobias Lenz MD , Costanza Pellegrini MD , Tobias Rheude MD , Hendrik Sager MD , Heribert Schunkert MD , Fabian Starnecker MD , Felix Voll MD , Erion Xhepa MD, PhD , Adnan Kastrati MD , Thorsten Kessler MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.12.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions is limited by inadequate stent expansion and poor clinical outcomes. Over the past decade, several devices and techniques have been developed for calcium modification and lesion preparation. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool in this context. Although numerous observational studies have been reported on this technique, randomized trials powered for clinical outcomes on the relative merits of IVL in patients with severely calcified lesions are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Study design and objectives</h3><div>The ISAR-WAVE trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial. The aim is to test whether IVL is superior to other calcium-modifying techniques (modified or super high-pressure balloon and atheroablative devices) in <em>de novo</em> severely calcified coronary lesions. The study is planned to enroll 666 patients. The primary endpoint is the composite of major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization at 12 months. In addition to the individual components of the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints include also safety, quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>ISAR-WAVE is a multicenter, randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that a strategy of IVL confers superior clinical performance compared to other calcium-modifying techniques in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for a <em>de novo</em> severely calcified coronary artery lesion.</div></div><div><h3>Trial registration</h3><div>ClilicalTrial.gov, NCT06369142.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":\"282 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324003375\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324003375","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intracoronary stenting and additional results achieved by shockWAVE coronary lithotripsy: design and rationale of ISAR-WAVE trial
Background
Percutaneous coronary intervention of severely calcified lesions is limited by inadequate stent expansion and poor clinical outcomes. Over the past decade, several devices and techniques have been developed for calcium modification and lesion preparation. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a novel tool in this context. Although numerous observational studies have been reported on this technique, randomized trials powered for clinical outcomes on the relative merits of IVL in patients with severely calcified lesions are lacking.
Study design and objectives
The ISAR-WAVE trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind controlled trial. The aim is to test whether IVL is superior to other calcium-modifying techniques (modified or super high-pressure balloon and atheroablative devices) in de novo severely calcified coronary lesions. The study is planned to enroll 666 patients. The primary endpoint is the composite of major cardiac and cerebrovascular adverse events defined as death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke and clinically indicated target vessel revascularization at 12 months. In addition to the individual components of the primary endpoint, secondary endpoints include also safety, quality of life and cost-effectiveness measures.
Conclusions
ISAR-WAVE is a multicenter, randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that a strategy of IVL confers superior clinical performance compared to other calcium-modifying techniques in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention for a de novo severely calcified coronary artery lesion.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.