护士在社交媒体上的沟通能力：文献计量学回顾。

IF 3.6 2区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106542

María Martín-Fernández , Hildegart González-Luis , María José Hernández-Leal , Mónica Arias-Colinas

{"title":"护士在社交媒体上的沟通能力：文献计量学回顾。","authors":"María Martín-Fernández , Hildegart González-Luis , María José Hernández-Leal , Mónica Arias-Colinas","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyse the characteristics of articles published on the competencies, abilities, knowledge and education that nurses should have to be able to communicate, inform, disseminate and/or be an informative source in mass media and social media.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This bibliometric study involved a comprehensive search of two databases, PubMed and Scopus. The search terms included 'nursing', 'communication', and 'mass media', along with their synonyms. Article selection was performed through screening titles and abstracts, with any uncertainties resolved through discussions among the researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>The data were sourced from PubMed and Scopus, selected for their extensive coverage of academic literature related to nursing and communication.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1,290 articles were initially identified. After screening, 463 articles were analysed. The study employed bibliometric analysis to evaluate publication trends, authorship patterns, and thematic focus. Key metrics such as annual publication growth rate, co-authorship, and thematic prevalence were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>The analysis revealed that the articles were published from 1,971 onwards, with an annual production growth rate of 6.83%. The total number of authors was 1,645, with an average co-authorship of 3 to 4 researchers per article. The most frequently discussed themes included Social Media, COVID-19, and Nurses. Notable authors included Booth R. (5 articles), Borycki E. (4 articles), and Jackson D. (4 articles). The most prominent journal was Nurse Education Today (20 articles), with the highest publication output from the United States (695 articles), followed by Australia (436 articles). Leading institutions included King Saud University (47 articles) and the University of Tripoli (37 articles).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This bibliometric review provides valuable insights for researchers, educators, and managers interested in the evolving role of nursing in traditional and social media. It highlights key researchers, influential journals, significant authors, and prominent countries in this field, offering a foundational understanding for further research and development in nursing communication competencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"146 ","pages":"Article 106542"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses communication competencies in social media: A bibliometric review\",\"authors\":\"María Martín-Fernández , Hildegart González-Luis , María José Hernández-Leal , Mónica Arias-Colinas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To analyse the characteristics of articles published on the competencies, abilities, knowledge and education that nurses should have to be able to communicate, inform, disseminate and/or be an informative source in mass media and social media.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This bibliometric study involved a comprehensive search of two databases, PubMed and Scopus. The search terms included 'nursing', 'communication', and 'mass media', along with their synonyms. Article selection was performed through screening titles and abstracts, with any uncertainties resolved through discussions among the researchers.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>The data were sourced from PubMed and Scopus, selected for their extensive coverage of academic literature related to nursing and communication.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A total of 1,290 articles were initially identified. After screening, 463 articles were analysed. The study employed bibliometric analysis to evaluate publication trends, authorship patterns, and thematic focus. Key metrics such as annual publication growth rate, co-authorship, and thematic prevalence were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><div>The analysis revealed that the articles were published from 1,971 onwards, with an annual production growth rate of 6.83%. The total number of authors was 1,645, with an average co-authorship of 3 to 4 researchers per article. The most frequently discussed themes included Social Media, COVID-19, and Nurses. Notable authors included Booth R. (5 articles), Borycki E. (4 articles), and Jackson D. (4 articles). The most prominent journal was Nurse Education Today (20 articles), with the highest publication output from the United States (695 articles), followed by Australia (436 articles). Leading institutions included King Saud University (47 articles) and the University of Tripoli (37 articles).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This bibliometric review provides valuable insights for researchers, educators, and managers interested in the evolving role of nursing in traditional and social media. It highlights key researchers, influential journals, significant authors, and prominent countries in this field, offering a foundational understanding for further research and development in nursing communication competencies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"146 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004520\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724004520","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

目的：分析在大众媒体和社交媒体上发表的关于护士应具备的沟通、告知、传播和/或成为信息来源的胜任力、能力、知识和教育的文章的特点。设计：这项文献计量学研究包括对PubMed和Scopus两个数据库的全面检索。搜索词包括“护理”、“沟通”和“大众媒体”，以及它们的同义词。文章选择是通过筛选标题和摘要进行的，任何不确定因素都是通过研究者之间的讨论来解决的。数据来源：数据来源于PubMed和Scopus，选择这两个网站是因为它们广泛覆盖了与护理和沟通相关的学术文献。方法：初步鉴定了1290篇文献。筛选后共分析463篇文献。该研究采用文献计量学分析来评估出版趋势、作者模式和主题重点。评估了年度出版物增长率、合著率和专题流行率等关键指标。结果与讨论：分析显示，论文发表时间为1971年以后，年产量增长率为6.83%。论文作者总数为1645人，平均每篇论文有3 ~ 4名共同作者。最常讨论的主题包括社交媒体、COVID-19和护士。著名作者包括Booth R.（5篇文章）、Borycki E.（4篇文章）和Jackson D.（4篇文章）。最突出的期刊是《今日护士教育》（Nurse Education Today）（20篇文章），其中美国的论文发表量最高（695篇），其次是澳大利亚（436篇）。排名靠前的大学包括沙特国王大学（47篇文章）和的黎波里大学（37篇文章）。结论：这篇文献计量学综述为研究人员、教育工作者和管理人员提供了有价值的见解，这些研究人员对护理在传统媒体和社交媒体中的发展角色感兴趣。它突出了该领域的主要研究人员，有影响力的期刊，重要的作者和著名的国家，为进一步研究和发展护理沟通能力提供了基础的理解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Nurses communication competencies in social media: A bibliometric review

Objective

To analyse the characteristics of articles published on the competencies, abilities, knowledge and education that nurses should have to be able to communicate, inform, disseminate and/or be an informative source in mass media and social media.

Design

This bibliometric study involved a comprehensive search of two databases, PubMed and Scopus. The search terms included 'nursing', 'communication', and 'mass media', along with their synonyms. Article selection was performed through screening titles and abstracts, with any uncertainties resolved through discussions among the researchers.

Data sources

The data were sourced from PubMed and Scopus, selected for their extensive coverage of academic literature related to nursing and communication.

Methods

A total of 1,290 articles were initially identified. After screening, 463 articles were analysed. The study employed bibliometric analysis to evaluate publication trends, authorship patterns, and thematic focus. Key metrics such as annual publication growth rate, co-authorship, and thematic prevalence were assessed.

Results and discussion

The analysis revealed that the articles were published from 1,971 onwards, with an annual production growth rate of 6.83%. The total number of authors was 1,645, with an average co-authorship of 3 to 4 researchers per article. The most frequently discussed themes included Social Media, COVID-19, and Nurses. Notable authors included Booth R. (5 articles), Borycki E. (4 articles), and Jackson D. (4 articles). The most prominent journal was Nurse Education Today (20 articles), with the highest publication output from the United States (695 articles), followed by Australia (436 articles). Leading institutions included King Saud University (47 articles) and the University of Tripoli (37 articles).

Conclusion

This bibliometric review provides valuable insights for researchers, educators, and managers interested in the evolving role of nursing in traditional and social media. It highlights key researchers, influential journals, significant authors, and prominent countries in this field, offering a foundational understanding for further research and development in nursing communication competencies.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Nurse Education Today 医学-护理

CiteScore

6.90

自引率

12.80%

发文量

349

审稿时长

58 days

期刊介绍： Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.