学生和物理治疗师对处方有效体育活动和运动干预的感知能力:一项横断面调查。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245
Thomas Wing, Matthew Wright, Paul Chesterton
{"title":"学生和物理治疗师对处方有效体育活动和运动干预的感知能力:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Thomas Wing, Matthew Wright, Paul Chesterton","doi":"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity, aerobic and resistance training have established benefits to health and wellbeing, with physiotherapists playing a vital role in their promotion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To capture UK student and graduate physiotherapists (1) knowledge of accepted guidelines and, (2) perceptions of physical activity and exercise prescription in practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National cross-sectional online survey.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A survey was conducted online among UK student and graduate physiotherapists from July to December 2021. Quantitative questions included dichotomous (yes/no), multiple-choice, and Likert scale (1-5) formats, alongside open-ended qualitative questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 305 respondents (18% students, 47% > 10 years' experience), 295 (97%) either \"agreed\" (n = 64, 21%) or \"strongly agreed\" (n = 231, 76%) that physical activity was a part of their role. Less than half felt the physiotherapy profession was able to provide effective physical activity (n = 149, 49%, 95% confidence intervals 43 to 54) and aerobic training (130, 43%, 37 to 48). Most knew the weekly minimum adult dosage of physical activity (257, 84%, 80 to 88) and resistance training (267, 88%, 83 to 91) but were generally unable to correctly identify aerobic and resistance training guidelines. Of those who used evidenced based guidelines regularly with patients 72% were not adopting correct guidelines for aerobic (n = 58, 72%, 61 to 80) and 46% for resistance training (n = 45, 46%, 36 to 56). Limited patient appointment duration, inadequate access to facilities and a lack of continuous professional development opportunities were perceived barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents agreed physical activity and exercise are vital treatment modalities, however many lack the knowledge to deliver these interventions in line with contemporary guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":56036,"journal":{"name":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","volume":"75 ","pages":"103245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student and physiotherapists' perceived abilities to prescribe effective physical activity and exercise interventions: A cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Wing, Matthew Wright, Paul Chesterton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity, aerobic and resistance training have established benefits to health and wellbeing, with physiotherapists playing a vital role in their promotion.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To capture UK student and graduate physiotherapists (1) knowledge of accepted guidelines and, (2) perceptions of physical activity and exercise prescription in practice.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National cross-sectional online survey.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A survey was conducted online among UK student and graduate physiotherapists from July to December 2021. Quantitative questions included dichotomous (yes/no), multiple-choice, and Likert scale (1-5) formats, alongside open-ended qualitative questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 305 respondents (18% students, 47% > 10 years' experience), 295 (97%) either \\\"agreed\\\" (n = 64, 21%) or \\\"strongly agreed\\\" (n = 231, 76%) that physical activity was a part of their role. Less than half felt the physiotherapy profession was able to provide effective physical activity (n = 149, 49%, 95% confidence intervals 43 to 54) and aerobic training (130, 43%, 37 to 48). Most knew the weekly minimum adult dosage of physical activity (257, 84%, 80 to 88) and resistance training (267, 88%, 83 to 91) but were generally unable to correctly identify aerobic and resistance training guidelines. Of those who used evidenced based guidelines regularly with patients 72% were not adopting correct guidelines for aerobic (n = 58, 72%, 61 to 80) and 46% for resistance training (n = 45, 46%, 36 to 56). Limited patient appointment duration, inadequate access to facilities and a lack of continuous professional development opportunities were perceived barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Respondents agreed physical activity and exercise are vital treatment modalities, however many lack the knowledge to deliver these interventions in line with contemporary guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"103245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musculoskeletal Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2024.103245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:体力活动、有氧和阻力训练已经确立了对健康和福祉的好处,物理治疗师在促进它们方面起着至关重要的作用。目的:捕获英国学生和研究生物理治疗师(1)公认的指导方针的知识,(2)在实践中对身体活动和运动处方的看法。设计:全国横断面在线调查。方法:从2021年7月到12月,在英国学生和研究生物理治疗师中进行了一项在线调查。定量问题包括二分法(是/否)、多项选择题和李克特量表(1-5)格式,以及开放式定性问题。结果:在305名受访者中(18%是学生,47%有10年工作经验),295人(97%)“同意”(n = 64, 21%)或“非常同意”(n = 231, 76%)体育活动是他们工作的一部分。不到一半的人认为物理治疗专业能够提供有效的身体活动(n = 149, 49%, 95%置信区间43至54)和有氧训练(130,43%,37至48)。大多数人知道每周最小体力活动成人剂量(257,84%,80至88)和阻力训练(267,88%,83至91),但通常不能正确识别有氧和阻力训练指南。在那些定期使用循证指南的患者中,72%的患者没有采用正确的有氧训练指南(n = 58, 72%, 61 - 80), 46%的患者没有采用正确的阻力训练指南(n = 45, 46%, 36 - 56)。患者预约时间有限、设施使用不足以及缺乏持续的专业发展机会被认为是实施的障碍。结论:受访者同意身体活动和锻炼是重要的治疗方式,但许多人缺乏根据当代指南提供这些干预措施的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student and physiotherapists' perceived abilities to prescribe effective physical activity and exercise interventions: A cross-sectional survey.

Background: Physical activity, aerobic and resistance training have established benefits to health and wellbeing, with physiotherapists playing a vital role in their promotion.

Objectives: To capture UK student and graduate physiotherapists (1) knowledge of accepted guidelines and, (2) perceptions of physical activity and exercise prescription in practice.

Design: National cross-sectional online survey.

Methodology: A survey was conducted online among UK student and graduate physiotherapists from July to December 2021. Quantitative questions included dichotomous (yes/no), multiple-choice, and Likert scale (1-5) formats, alongside open-ended qualitative questions.

Results: Of 305 respondents (18% students, 47% > 10 years' experience), 295 (97%) either "agreed" (n = 64, 21%) or "strongly agreed" (n = 231, 76%) that physical activity was a part of their role. Less than half felt the physiotherapy profession was able to provide effective physical activity (n = 149, 49%, 95% confidence intervals 43 to 54) and aerobic training (130, 43%, 37 to 48). Most knew the weekly minimum adult dosage of physical activity (257, 84%, 80 to 88) and resistance training (267, 88%, 83 to 91) but were generally unable to correctly identify aerobic and resistance training guidelines. Of those who used evidenced based guidelines regularly with patients 72% were not adopting correct guidelines for aerobic (n = 58, 72%, 61 to 80) and 46% for resistance training (n = 45, 46%, 36 to 56). Limited patient appointment duration, inadequate access to facilities and a lack of continuous professional development opportunities were perceived barriers to implementation.

Conclusion: Respondents agreed physical activity and exercise are vital treatment modalities, however many lack the knowledge to deliver these interventions in line with contemporary guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Science & Practice, international journal of musculoskeletal physiotherapy, is a peer-reviewed international journal (previously Manual Therapy), publishing high quality original research, review and Masterclass articles that contribute to improving the clinical understanding of appropriate care processes for musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes articles that influence or add to the body of evidence on diagnostic and therapeutic processes, patient centered care, guidelines for musculoskeletal therapeutics and theoretical models that support developments in assessment, diagnosis, clinical reasoning and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信