在小儿上肢骨折护理中,患者回答与护理人员回答的患者报告的结果有差异吗?

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Cade C Smelley, Tyler C McDonald
{"title":"在小儿上肢骨折护理中,患者回答与护理人员回答的患者报告的结果有差异吗?","authors":"Cade C Smelley, Tyler C McDonald","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes in children can be assessed using self-report or caregiver proxy-report; however, self-reported and proxy-reported outcomes often vary between respondents, a phenomenon called cross-informant variance. This phenomenon has not been studied in pediatric fracture care. This study compares self-reported and proxy-reported patient-reported outcomes in children being treated for upper extremity fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 8 to 17 with upper extremity fractures completed pediatric self-report questionnaires and their caregivers completed parent proxy-report questionnaires composed of items from three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains (Physical Function-Upper Extremity, Psychological Stress Experiences, and Pain-Interference). Mean patient and caregiver T-scores for each domain were compared using paired T-tests. Correlation between scores was assessed using scatterplots and Pearson correlation coefficient. Agreement between child and caregiver T-scores was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred child-caregiver dyads were included. Patients' mean age was 12.3 years, and 68% were male. Statistically significant differences were found between mean patient and caregiver T-scores in all PROMIS domains. Caregivers overestimated patient pain and psychological stress and underestimated upper extremity function. However, only the disagreement in the Pain-Interference domain met the threshold of clinical significance, a difference of three or more T-score points. Bland-Altman analysis revealed proportional bias in the Psychological Stress Experiences and Pain-Interference domains. With higher T-scores, caregivers tended to overestimate psychological stress to a greater extent but tended toward agreement with their children for pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study identified cross-informant variance between children and caretakers in the setting of pediatric upper extremity fractures. Although notable differences were observed in all PROMIS domains included, only one met the level of clinical significance, suggesting that not all domains are equally susceptible to child-caretaker disagreement. As patient-reported outcomes become more used in pediatric settings, the possibility of cross-informant variance must be considered when choosing to use self-report or proxy-report instruments.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do Patient-Answered Versus Caregiver-Answered Patient-Reported Outcomes Differ in Pediatric Upper Extremity Fracture Care?\",\"authors\":\"Cade C Smelley, Tyler C McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient-reported outcomes in children can be assessed using self-report or caregiver proxy-report; however, self-reported and proxy-reported outcomes often vary between respondents, a phenomenon called cross-informant variance. This phenomenon has not been studied in pediatric fracture care. This study compares self-reported and proxy-reported patient-reported outcomes in children being treated for upper extremity fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Children aged 8 to 17 with upper extremity fractures completed pediatric self-report questionnaires and their caregivers completed parent proxy-report questionnaires composed of items from three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains (Physical Function-Upper Extremity, Psychological Stress Experiences, and Pain-Interference). Mean patient and caregiver T-scores for each domain were compared using paired T-tests. Correlation between scores was assessed using scatterplots and Pearson correlation coefficient. Agreement between child and caregiver T-scores was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred child-caregiver dyads were included. Patients' mean age was 12.3 years, and 68% were male. Statistically significant differences were found between mean patient and caregiver T-scores in all PROMIS domains. Caregivers overestimated patient pain and psychological stress and underestimated upper extremity function. However, only the disagreement in the Pain-Interference domain met the threshold of clinical significance, a difference of three or more T-score points. Bland-Altman analysis revealed proportional bias in the Psychological Stress Experiences and Pain-Interference domains. With higher T-scores, caregivers tended to overestimate psychological stress to a greater extent but tended toward agreement with their children for pain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study identified cross-informant variance between children and caretakers in the setting of pediatric upper extremity fractures. Although notable differences were observed in all PROMIS domains included, only one met the level of clinical significance, suggesting that not all domains are equally susceptible to child-caretaker disagreement. As patient-reported outcomes become more used in pediatric settings, the possibility of cross-informant variance must be considered when choosing to use self-report or proxy-report instruments.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01046\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童患者报告的结局可采用自我报告或照护者代理报告进行评估;然而,自我报告和代理报告的结果在被调查者之间往往不同,这种现象被称为交叉信息方差。这一现象尚未在小儿骨折护理中得到研究。本研究比较了接受上肢骨折治疗的儿童自我报告和代理报告的患者报告的结果。方法:8 ~ 17岁上肢骨折患儿完成儿童自我报告问卷,其照顾者完成家长代理报告问卷,问卷内容来自三个患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)域(身体功能-上肢、心理应激经历和疼痛干扰)。使用配对t检验比较每个领域的患者和护理者的平均t得分。评分间的相关性采用散点图和Pearson相关系数进行评估。使用Bland-Altman图评估儿童和照料者t得分之间的一致性。结果:共纳入100对幼儿照顾者。患者平均年龄12.3岁,68%为男性。在所有PROMIS领域中,患者和护理人员的平均t得分存在统计学上的显著差异。护理人员高估了患者的疼痛和心理压力,低估了上肢功能。然而,只有疼痛干扰域的差异达到临床意义的阈值,即T-score差3分或更多。Bland-Altman分析揭示了心理应激体验和疼痛干扰域的比例偏差。随着t分数的提高,照顾者倾向于高估心理压力,但更倾向于同意他们的孩子的痛苦。讨论:本研究确定了儿童和护理人员在儿童上肢骨折情况下的交叉信息差异。虽然在所有的PROMIS领域都观察到显著的差异,但只有一个领域达到了临床意义的水平,这表明并非所有领域都同样容易受到儿童看护人分歧的影响。由于患者报告的结果越来越多地用于儿科环境,在选择使用自我报告或代理报告工具时,必须考虑交叉信息差异的可能性。证据等级:三级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do Patient-Answered Versus Caregiver-Answered Patient-Reported Outcomes Differ in Pediatric Upper Extremity Fracture Care?

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes in children can be assessed using self-report or caregiver proxy-report; however, self-reported and proxy-reported outcomes often vary between respondents, a phenomenon called cross-informant variance. This phenomenon has not been studied in pediatric fracture care. This study compares self-reported and proxy-reported patient-reported outcomes in children being treated for upper extremity fractures.

Methods: Children aged 8 to 17 with upper extremity fractures completed pediatric self-report questionnaires and their caregivers completed parent proxy-report questionnaires composed of items from three Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains (Physical Function-Upper Extremity, Psychological Stress Experiences, and Pain-Interference). Mean patient and caregiver T-scores for each domain were compared using paired T-tests. Correlation between scores was assessed using scatterplots and Pearson correlation coefficient. Agreement between child and caregiver T-scores was assessed using Bland-Altman plots.

Results: One hundred child-caregiver dyads were included. Patients' mean age was 12.3 years, and 68% were male. Statistically significant differences were found between mean patient and caregiver T-scores in all PROMIS domains. Caregivers overestimated patient pain and psychological stress and underestimated upper extremity function. However, only the disagreement in the Pain-Interference domain met the threshold of clinical significance, a difference of three or more T-score points. Bland-Altman analysis revealed proportional bias in the Psychological Stress Experiences and Pain-Interference domains. With higher T-scores, caregivers tended to overestimate psychological stress to a greater extent but tended toward agreement with their children for pain.

Discussion: This study identified cross-informant variance between children and caretakers in the setting of pediatric upper extremity fractures. Although notable differences were observed in all PROMIS domains included, only one met the level of clinical significance, suggesting that not all domains are equally susceptible to child-caretaker disagreement. As patient-reported outcomes become more used in pediatric settings, the possibility of cross-informant variance must be considered when choosing to use self-report or proxy-report instruments.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信