新药与高危医疗器械的医患沟通。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1177/0272989X241302096
Sanket S Dhruva, Aaron S Kesselheim, Steven Woloshin, Robin Z Ji, Zhigang Lu, Jonathan J Darrow, Rita F Redberg
{"title":"新药与高危医疗器械的医患沟通。","authors":"Sanket S Dhruva, Aaron S Kesselheim, Steven Woloshin, Robin Z Ji, Zhigang Lu, Jonathan J Darrow, Rita F Redberg","doi":"10.1177/0272989X241302096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After a new drug or medical device is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), physician-patient communication about benefits and risks is critical, including whether the product was approved through an expedited pathway based on limited evidence. In addition, physician reporting of drug- and device-related adverse events in real-world use is necessary to have a complete safety profile. We studied physician-reported communication and safety-reporting practices related to drugs and devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a random national sample of American Board of Internal Medicine-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists between October 2021 and September 2022 about the sources of information used to prescribe a drug or medical device, details of communication with patients, and reporting of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 509 respondents (39% response rate), 387 (76%) reported that FDA approval influenced their decision \"a lot\" to prescribe a new drug or recommend use of a medical device. Half (122; 50%) of the 244 physicians randomized to receive a question about their own communication of trial endpoints reported \"usually\" telling patients when products were approved based on surrogate measures and 126 (52%) \"usually\" reported telling patients if a postapproval trial was required to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Two-thirds (165) said they were likely to report drug- or device-related adverse events to FDA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physician self-reporting of communication with patients about drugs and devices suggests that half include characteristics of the pivotal trials such as use of clinically meaningful endpoints or continued requirement for evidence generation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>More consistent discussions with patients about the quality of evidence supporting new drugs and devices and increased reporting of adverse events could ensure optimal use of these products in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Among 509 board-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists, half reported telling patients when drugs or medical devices were approved based on surrogate measures and when there was an FDA-mandated postapproval trial to further evaluate safety and effectiveness.As drugs and medical devices are increasingly approved by the FDA through expedited pathways based on data with lingering uncertainties, discussion with patients about issues such as the nature of the endpoints assessed and existence of postapproval testing requirements can help inform patient decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"156-167"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physician-Patient Communication about Novel Drugs and High-Risk Medical Devices.\",\"authors\":\"Sanket S Dhruva, Aaron S Kesselheim, Steven Woloshin, Robin Z Ji, Zhigang Lu, Jonathan J Darrow, Rita F Redberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0272989X241302096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After a new drug or medical device is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), physician-patient communication about benefits and risks is critical, including whether the product was approved through an expedited pathway based on limited evidence. In addition, physician reporting of drug- and device-related adverse events in real-world use is necessary to have a complete safety profile. We studied physician-reported communication and safety-reporting practices related to drugs and devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed a random national sample of American Board of Internal Medicine-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists between October 2021 and September 2022 about the sources of information used to prescribe a drug or medical device, details of communication with patients, and reporting of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 509 respondents (39% response rate), 387 (76%) reported that FDA approval influenced their decision \\\"a lot\\\" to prescribe a new drug or recommend use of a medical device. Half (122; 50%) of the 244 physicians randomized to receive a question about their own communication of trial endpoints reported \\\"usually\\\" telling patients when products were approved based on surrogate measures and 126 (52%) \\\"usually\\\" reported telling patients if a postapproval trial was required to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Two-thirds (165) said they were likely to report drug- or device-related adverse events to FDA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Physician self-reporting of communication with patients about drugs and devices suggests that half include characteristics of the pivotal trials such as use of clinically meaningful endpoints or continued requirement for evidence generation.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>More consistent discussions with patients about the quality of evidence supporting new drugs and devices and increased reporting of adverse events could ensure optimal use of these products in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Among 509 board-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists, half reported telling patients when drugs or medical devices were approved based on surrogate measures and when there was an FDA-mandated postapproval trial to further evaluate safety and effectiveness.As drugs and medical devices are increasingly approved by the FDA through expedited pathways based on data with lingering uncertainties, discussion with patients about issues such as the nature of the endpoints assessed and existence of postapproval testing requirements can help inform patient decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"156-167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11736971/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X241302096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X241302096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准一种新药或医疗器械后,医患之间关于获益和风险的沟通至关重要,包括该产品是否通过基于有限证据的加速途径获得批准。此外,医生在真实使用中报告药物和器械相关的不良事件对于获得完整的安全性档案是必要的。我们研究了与药物和器械相关的医生报告沟通和安全报告实践。方法:在2021年10月至2022年9月期间,我们随机调查了美国内科医学委员会认证的内科医生、心脏病专家和肿瘤学家的全国样本,内容包括处方药物或医疗器械的信息来源、与患者沟通的细节以及不良事件的报告。结果:在509名受访者(39%的回复率)中,387人(76%)表示FDA的批准对他们开新药或推荐使用医疗器械的决定影响“很大”。一半(122;244名医生随机接受了一个关于他们自己对试验终点的沟通的问题,其中50%的医生报告“通常”告诉患者产品何时根据替代措施获得批准,126名(52%)医生报告说:“通常”报告告诉患者是否需要进行批准后试验来评估安全性和有效性。三分之二(165人)表示他们可能会向FDA报告药物或器械相关的不良事件。结论:医生自我报告与患者关于药物和设备的沟通表明,其中一半包括关键试验的特征,如使用临床有意义的终点或继续要求证据生成。意义:与患者就支持新药和器械的证据质量进行更一致的讨论,并增加不良事件的报告,可以确保这些产品在临床实践中的最佳使用。重点:在509名委员会认证的内科医生、心脏病专家和肿瘤学家中,有一半的人报告说,他们告诉患者药物或医疗器械何时根据替代措施获得批准,以及何时有fda授权的批准后试验来进一步评估安全性和有效性。随着药物和医疗器械越来越多地通过基于数据的快速途径获得FDA的批准,这些数据具有挥之不去的不确定性,与患者讨论诸如评估终点的性质和批准后测试要求的存在等问题可以帮助患者做出决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physician-Patient Communication about Novel Drugs and High-Risk Medical Devices.

Background: After a new drug or medical device is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), physician-patient communication about benefits and risks is critical, including whether the product was approved through an expedited pathway based on limited evidence. In addition, physician reporting of drug- and device-related adverse events in real-world use is necessary to have a complete safety profile. We studied physician-reported communication and safety-reporting practices related to drugs and devices.

Methods: We surveyed a random national sample of American Board of Internal Medicine-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists between October 2021 and September 2022 about the sources of information used to prescribe a drug or medical device, details of communication with patients, and reporting of adverse events.

Results: Among 509 respondents (39% response rate), 387 (76%) reported that FDA approval influenced their decision "a lot" to prescribe a new drug or recommend use of a medical device. Half (122; 50%) of the 244 physicians randomized to receive a question about their own communication of trial endpoints reported "usually" telling patients when products were approved based on surrogate measures and 126 (52%) "usually" reported telling patients if a postapproval trial was required to evaluate safety and effectiveness. Two-thirds (165) said they were likely to report drug- or device-related adverse events to FDA.

Conclusions: Physician self-reporting of communication with patients about drugs and devices suggests that half include characteristics of the pivotal trials such as use of clinically meaningful endpoints or continued requirement for evidence generation.

Implications: More consistent discussions with patients about the quality of evidence supporting new drugs and devices and increased reporting of adverse events could ensure optimal use of these products in clinical practice.

Highlights: Among 509 board-certified internists, cardiologists, and oncologists, half reported telling patients when drugs or medical devices were approved based on surrogate measures and when there was an FDA-mandated postapproval trial to further evaluate safety and effectiveness.As drugs and medical devices are increasingly approved by the FDA through expedited pathways based on data with lingering uncertainties, discussion with patients about issues such as the nature of the endpoints assessed and existence of postapproval testing requirements can help inform patient decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信