院外应急包的传统与基于任务的包组织:紧急医疗服务模拟研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Daniel Laxar, Daniel Grassmann, Lena Reischmann, Alexandra Kaider, Bertram Schadler, Carmen Huber, Mario Krammel, Christina Hafner
{"title":"院外应急包的传统与基于任务的包组织:紧急医疗服务模拟研究。","authors":"Daniel Laxar, Daniel Grassmann, Lena Reischmann, Alexandra Kaider, Bertram Schadler, Carmen Huber, Mario Krammel, Christina Hafner","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Medical Service crews are equipped with comprehensive emergency kits for routine care and to provide life-saving interventions in severely ill patients. While guidelines on contents and packing strategies of emergency kits for specific tasks and specialized situations exist, data for the design of out-of-hospital emergency kits in a general urban population is lacking. It may be possible to transfer the promising results of modern in-hospital packing strategies such as task-based package organization (TPO) to an Emergency Medical Service setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four types of emergency kit were used in this study: two novel backpack emergency kits were acquired for this study (one packed using a TPO approach (PAX bags) and the other a traditional non-TPO approach (inter-rescue)); the existing emergency kit; and a TPO-repack of the existing kit. We recruited 80 paramedics who each performed four different tasks in a simulated setting: preparation for endotracheal intubation; preparing an intravenous access and a crystalloid infusion; preparing intraosseous access with medication; and preparing for a forearm splint. Questionnaires were completed before starting, after each task, and at the end of each study session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no overall difference for the primary outcome of task completion between the novel TPO and novel non-TPO kit (p = 0.11). However, for selected tasks (forearm splint) completion time was significantly different between these kits. Overall, participants performed fastest when using the existing emergency kit. Participants frequently omitted items required for critical procedures, regardless of kit type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPO has been previously investigated in an in-hospital setting using participants with low exposure to medical emergencies, and with promising results. In our prehospital simulation setting with paramedics, equipment retrieval was neither faster nor more complete compared to non-TPO kits.</p>","PeriodicalId":49292,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","volume":"32 1","pages":"135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conventional versus task-based package organization for out-of-hospital emergency kits: an emergency medical services simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Laxar, Daniel Grassmann, Lena Reischmann, Alexandra Kaider, Bertram Schadler, Carmen Huber, Mario Krammel, Christina Hafner\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency Medical Service crews are equipped with comprehensive emergency kits for routine care and to provide life-saving interventions in severely ill patients. While guidelines on contents and packing strategies of emergency kits for specific tasks and specialized situations exist, data for the design of out-of-hospital emergency kits in a general urban population is lacking. It may be possible to transfer the promising results of modern in-hospital packing strategies such as task-based package organization (TPO) to an Emergency Medical Service setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four types of emergency kit were used in this study: two novel backpack emergency kits were acquired for this study (one packed using a TPO approach (PAX bags) and the other a traditional non-TPO approach (inter-rescue)); the existing emergency kit; and a TPO-repack of the existing kit. We recruited 80 paramedics who each performed four different tasks in a simulated setting: preparation for endotracheal intubation; preparing an intravenous access and a crystalloid infusion; preparing intraosseous access with medication; and preparing for a forearm splint. Questionnaires were completed before starting, after each task, and at the end of each study session.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no overall difference for the primary outcome of task completion between the novel TPO and novel non-TPO kit (p = 0.11). However, for selected tasks (forearm splint) completion time was significantly different between these kits. Overall, participants performed fastest when using the existing emergency kit. Participants frequently omitted items required for critical procedures, regardless of kit type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPO has been previously investigated in an in-hospital setting using participants with low exposure to medical emergencies, and with promising results. In our prehospital simulation setting with paramedics, equipment retrieval was neither faster nor more complete compared to non-TPO kits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660938/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma Resuscitation & Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01309-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:紧急医疗服务人员配备了全面的急救包,用于日常护理和为重症患者提供挽救生命的干预措施。虽然存在针对特定任务和特殊情况的急救包的内容和包装战略准则,但缺乏为一般城市人口设计院外急救包的数据。有可能将现代医院内包装策略(如基于任务的包装组织(TPO))的有希望的结果转移到紧急医疗服务环境中。方法:本研究使用了四种类型的急救包:本研究获得了两种新型背包急救包(一种采用TPO方式(PAX袋),另一种采用传统的非TPO方式(interrescue));现有应急包;以及现有套件的tpo包。我们招募了80名护理人员,他们每人在模拟环境中执行四项不同的任务:准备气管插管;制备静脉注射通道和晶体输注;用药物准备骨内通路;准备前臂夹板。调查问卷在开始前、每次任务后和每次学习结束时完成。结果:新型TPO和新型非TPO套件在任务完成的主要结局上没有总体差异(p = 0.11)。然而,对于选定的任务(前臂夹板),完成时间在这些套件之间有显着差异。总的来说,参与者在使用现有的急救包时反应最快。参与者经常忽略关键程序所需的项目,无论试剂盒类型如何。结论:TPO之前已经在医院环境中进行了调查,使用了低暴露于医疗紧急情况的参与者,并取得了有希望的结果。在我们与护理人员的院前模拟设置中,与非tpo套件相比,设备检索既不更快也不更完整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conventional versus task-based package organization for out-of-hospital emergency kits: an emergency medical services simulation study.

Background: Emergency Medical Service crews are equipped with comprehensive emergency kits for routine care and to provide life-saving interventions in severely ill patients. While guidelines on contents and packing strategies of emergency kits for specific tasks and specialized situations exist, data for the design of out-of-hospital emergency kits in a general urban population is lacking. It may be possible to transfer the promising results of modern in-hospital packing strategies such as task-based package organization (TPO) to an Emergency Medical Service setting.

Methods: Four types of emergency kit were used in this study: two novel backpack emergency kits were acquired for this study (one packed using a TPO approach (PAX bags) and the other a traditional non-TPO approach (inter-rescue)); the existing emergency kit; and a TPO-repack of the existing kit. We recruited 80 paramedics who each performed four different tasks in a simulated setting: preparation for endotracheal intubation; preparing an intravenous access and a crystalloid infusion; preparing intraosseous access with medication; and preparing for a forearm splint. Questionnaires were completed before starting, after each task, and at the end of each study session.

Results: There was no overall difference for the primary outcome of task completion between the novel TPO and novel non-TPO kit (p = 0.11). However, for selected tasks (forearm splint) completion time was significantly different between these kits. Overall, participants performed fastest when using the existing emergency kit. Participants frequently omitted items required for critical procedures, regardless of kit type.

Conclusion: TPO has been previously investigated in an in-hospital setting using participants with low exposure to medical emergencies, and with promising results. In our prehospital simulation setting with paramedics, equipment retrieval was neither faster nor more complete compared to non-TPO kits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary topics of interest in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine (SJTREM) are the pre-hospital and early in-hospital diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of emergency medicine, trauma, and resuscitation. Contributions focusing on dispatch, major incidents, etiology, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, epidemiology, prevention, education, training, implementation, work environment, as well as ethical and socio-economic aspects may also be assessed for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信