巴基斯坦农村儿童健康的创新社区动员和社区激励(CoMIC):一项集群随机对照试验。

IF 19.9 1区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad, Rasool Bux, Anjum Naqvi, Fariha Shaheen, Rafey Ali, Sajid Muhammad, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta
{"title":"巴基斯坦农村儿童健康的创新社区动员和社区激励(CoMIC):一项集群随机对照试验。","authors":"Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad, Rasool Bux, Anjum Naqvi, Fariha Shaheen, Rafey Ali, Sajid Muhammad, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta","doi":"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any of the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Community mobilisation and incentivisation led to enhanced acceptance evidenced by improved community behaviours and increased coverage of essential interventions for child health. These findings have the potential to inform policy and future implementation of programmes targeting behaviour change but would need evaluation for varying outcomes and different contexts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p><p><strong>Translations: </strong>For the Sindhi and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>","PeriodicalId":48783,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Global Health","volume":"13 1","pages":"e121-e133"},"PeriodicalIF":19.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An innovative Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation for child health in rural Pakistan (CoMIC): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jai K Das, Rehana A Salam, Zahra Ali Padhani, Arjumand Rizvi, Mushtaq Mirani, Muhammad Khan Jamali, Imran Ahmed Chauhadry, Imtiaz Sheikh, Sana Khatoon, Khan Muhammad, Rasool Bux, Anjum Naqvi, Fariha Shaheen, Rafey Ali, Sajid Muhammad, Simon Cousens, Zulfiqar A Bhutta\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Between Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any of the primary outcomes.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Community mobilisation and incentivisation led to enhanced acceptance evidenced by improved community behaviours and increased coverage of essential interventions for child health. These findings have the potential to inform policy and future implementation of programmes targeting behaviour change but would need evaluation for varying outcomes and different contexts.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.</p><p><strong>Translations: </strong>For the Sindhi and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"e121-e133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00428-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于在获得和接受基本干预措施方面存在差异,传染病仍然是5岁以下儿童死亡的主要原因。社区动员和社区激励(CoMIC)试验旨在评估定制的社区动员和激励战略,以改善巴基斯坦儿童健康循证干预措施的覆盖面。方法:CoMIC是一项在巴基斯坦农村地区进行的三组随机对照试验。集群是根据地理邻近、民族一致性和确保每个集群人口在1500至3000人之间对村庄进行分组而形成的。分组随机分配(1:1:1)到社区动员组、社区动员和激励组或对照组。社区动员包括成立村委会开展宣传活动,而社区动员和激励组中的集群除了社区动员外,还提供了一种新的有条件的、集体的、基于社区的激励(C3I)。C3I的条件是在集群一级集体改善三个关键指标(主要结果)的覆盖率的一系列增量目标:全面免疫儿童的比例、口服补液的使用和卫生指数,在6个月、15个月和24个月进行评估,村委会决定对村民进行非现金奖励。数据由一个独立的研究小组进行意向治疗分析。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号NCT03594279,并已完成。研究结果:在2018年10月1日至2020年10月31日期间,来自24 846个家庭的21 638名5岁以下儿童被纳入研究,48个集群的总人口为139 005人。由152个村庄和7361名5岁以下儿童组成的16个小组被随机分配到社区动员和奖励组;由166个村庄和7546名5岁以下儿童组成的16个小组被随机分配到社区动员组;并将包括139个村庄和6731名5岁以下儿童在内的16个组随机分配为对照组。对3812名儿童进行了终线分析(1284名儿童在社区动员和激励组,1276名儿童在社区动员组,1252名儿童在对照组)。多变量分析表明,与对照组相比,24个月时社区动员和激励组的所有主要结局均有所改善,包括充分免疫儿童比例更高(风险比[RR] 1.3 [95% CI 1.0 - 1.5]),总卫生指数更高(平均差值为1.3 [95% CI 0.6 - 1.9]),口服补液使用增加(RR 1.5[1.0 - 2.2])。在任何主要结果方面,没有证据表明社区动员和控制之间存在差异。解释:社区动员和激励措施提高了人们的接受程度,社区行为的改善和儿童健康基本干预措施的覆盖面扩大就是证明。这些发现有可能为政策和未来实施以行为改变为目标的方案提供信息,但需要对不同的结果和不同的情况进行评估。资助:比尔及梅琳达·盖茨基金会。翻译:关于摘要的信德语和乌尔都语翻译,请参见补充材料部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An innovative Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation for child health in rural Pakistan (CoMIC): a cluster-randomised, controlled trial.

Background: Infectious diseases remain the leading cause of death among children younger than 5 years due to disparities in access and acceptance of essential interventions. The Community Mobilisation and Community Incentivisation (CoMIC) trial was designed to evaluate a customised community mobilisation and incentivisation strategy for improving coverage of evidence-based interventions for child health in Pakistan.

Methods: CoMIC was a three-arm cluster-randomised, controlled trial in rural areas of Pakistan. Clusters were formed by grouping villages based on geographical proximity, ethnic consistency, and ensuring a population between 1500 to 3000 per cluster. Clusters were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either community mobilisation, community mobilisation and incentivisation, or the control arm. Community mobilisation included formation of village committees which conducted awareness activities, while clusters in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group were provided with a novel conditional, collective, community-based incentive (C3I) in addition to community mobilisation. C3I was conditioned on serial incremental targets for collective improvement in coverage at cluster level of three key indicators (primary outcomes): proportion of fully immunised children, use of oral rehydration solution, and sanitation index, assessed at 6 months, 15 months, and 24 months, and village committees decided on non-cash incentives for people in the villages. Data were analysed as intention-to-treat by an independent team masked to study groups. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03594279, and is completed.

Findings: Between Oct 1, 2018 and Oct 31, 2020, 21 638 children younger than 5 years from 24 846 households, with a total population of 139 005 in 48 clusters, were included in the study. 16 clusters comprising of 152 villages and 7361 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation and incentivisation group; 16 clusters comprising of 166 villages and 7546 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the community mobilisation group; and 16 clusters comprising of 139 villages and 6731 children younger than 5 years were randomly assigned to the control group. Endline analyses were conducted on 3812 children (1284 in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group, 1276 in the community mobilisation group, and 1252 in the control group). Multivariable analysis indicates improvements in all primary outcomes including a higher proportion of fully immunised children (risk ratio [RR] 1·3 [95% CI 1·0-1·5]), higher total sanitation index (mean difference 1·3 [95% CI 0·6-1·9]), and increased oral rehydration solution use (RR 1·5 [1·0-2·2]) in the community mobilisation and incentivisation group compared with the control group at 24 months. There was no evidence of difference between community mobilisation and control for any of the primary outcomes.

Interpretation: Community mobilisation and incentivisation led to enhanced acceptance evidenced by improved community behaviours and increased coverage of essential interventions for child health. These findings have the potential to inform policy and future implementation of programmes targeting behaviour change but would need evaluation for varying outcomes and different contexts.

Funding: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Translations: For the Sindhi and Urdu translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Global Health
Lancet Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
44.10
自引率
1.20%
发文量
763
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Global Health is an online publication that releases monthly open access (subscription-free) issues.Each issue includes original research, commentary, and correspondence.In addition to this, the publication also provides regular blog posts. The main focus of The Lancet Global Health is on disadvantaged populations, which can include both entire economic regions and marginalized groups within prosperous nations.The publication prefers to cover topics related to reproductive, maternal, neonatal, child, and adolescent health; infectious diseases (including neglected tropical diseases); non-communicable diseases; mental health; the global health workforce; health systems; surgery; and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信