{"title":"健康公平的学者:结构化医师教师发展计划。","authors":"Jeffrey Ring, Daisy Torres, Rosio Ramos, Cristina M Gonzalez, Musarrat Nahid, Susana Morales, Erica Phillips","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.</p><p><strong>Program description: </strong>Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.</p><p><strong>Program evaluation: </strong>Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1802"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Ring, Daisy Torres, Rosio Ramos, Cristina M Gonzalez, Musarrat Nahid, Susana Morales, Erica Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.</p><p><strong>Program description: </strong>Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.</p><p><strong>Program evaluation: </strong>Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1797-1802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.
Background: Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.
Aim: To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.
Setting and participants: Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.
Program description: Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.
Program evaluation: Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.
Discussion: Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.