健康公平的学者:结构化医师教师发展计划。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w
Jeffrey Ring, Daisy Torres, Rosio Ramos, Cristina M Gonzalez, Musarrat Nahid, Susana Morales, Erica Phillips
{"title":"健康公平的学者:结构化医师教师发展计划。","authors":"Jeffrey Ring, Daisy Torres, Rosio Ramos, Cristina M Gonzalez, Musarrat Nahid, Susana Morales, Erica Phillips","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.</p><p><strong>Program description: </strong>Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.</p><p><strong>Program evaluation: </strong>Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1797-1802"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119412/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Ring, Daisy Torres, Rosio Ramos, Cristina M Gonzalez, Musarrat Nahid, Susana Morales, Erica Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.</p><p><strong>Program description: </strong>Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.</p><p><strong>Program evaluation: </strong>Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1797-1802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12119412/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of General Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09281-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将健康公平纳入医学教育课程的结构化教师发展计划仍然有限。目的:描述一个基于成人学习理论的跨学科教师发展计划,并评估其对参与者专业成长的影响。环境和参与者:来自6个学术附属卫生系统的21名教员。项目描述:在整整一年的时间里,提供了14个每月2小时的课程。课程主题包括健康公平、成人学习理论、课程开发、内隐偏见、健康的社会决定因素、种族主义、压迫以及与社区伙伴的合作。教育策略包括反思、小组讨论、逻辑模型和顶点发展。课程评估:使用李克特量表,参与者对课程的各个方面都进行了高度评价,中位数评分从4(同意)到5(非常同意)不等。焦点小组的结果表明,教师以意想不到的方式经历了急需的个人赋权和专业成长,并确定了几个程序性成长的机会。讨论:项目的优势包括它的跨学科性质,创造了一个空间来解决教师在他们的部门内促进健康公平所经历的孤立,提高技能,将健康公平融入他们的教学环境,以及参与者有机会将他们的奖学金设想为健康,健康公平和社区健康框架的社会决定因素中更广泛的方法的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scholars in Health Equity: A Program of Structured Physician Faculty Development.

Background: Structured faculty development programs focused on integrating health equity into medical education curricula remain limited.

Aim: To describe an interdisciplinary faculty development program grounded in adult learning theory and to assess its impact on participants' professional growth.

Setting and participants: Twenty-one faculty members across six academic-affiliated health systems.

Program description: Fourteen 2-h monthly sessions were delivered over one full year. Course topics included health equity, adult learning theory, curriculum development, implicit bias, social determinants of health, racism, oppression, and collaborating with community partners. Educational strategies included reflections, small group discussions, logic models, and capstone development.

Program evaluation: Using a Likert-type scale, participants rated all aspects of the program highly favorably, with median ratings ranging from 4 (agree) to 5 (strongly agree). Focus group results demonstrated that faculty experienced well-needed personal empowerment and professional growth in unexpected ways and identified several opportunities for programmatic growth.

Discussion: Program strengths included its interdisciplinary nature, creating a space to address isolation experienced by faculty working to advance health equity within their departments, advancement of skills to integrate health equity into their teaching contexts, and the opportunity for participants to envision their scholarship as part of a more extensive approach within the social determinants of health, health equity, and community health framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信