预测空腹血糖纵向趋势的混合效应神经网络模型。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Qiong Zou, Borui Chen, Yang Zhang, Xi Wu, Yi Wan, Changsheng Chen
{"title":"预测空腹血糖纵向趋势的混合效应神经网络模型。","authors":"Qiong Zou, Borui Chen, Yang Zhang, Xi Wu, Yi Wan, Changsheng Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12874-024-02442-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate fasting plasma glucose (FPG) trend prediction is important for management and treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a globally prevalent chronic disease. (Generalised) linear mixed-effects (LME) models and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to analyse longitudinal data; however, the former is insufficient for dealing with complex, nonlinear data, whereas with the latter, random effects are ignored. The aim of this study was to develop LME, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and mixed-effects NN models that combine the 2 to predict FPG levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monitoring data from 779 patients with T2DM from a multicentre, prospective study from the shared platform Figshare repository were divided 80/20 into training/test sets. The first 10 important features were modelled via random forest (RF) screening. First, an LME model was built to model interindividual differences, analyse the factors affecting FPG levels, compare the AIC and BIC values to screen the optimal model, and predict FPG levels. Second, multiple BPNN models were constructed via different variable sets to screen the optimal BPNN. Finally, an LME/BPNN combined model, named LMENN, was constructed via stacking integration. A 10-fold cross-validation cycle was performed using the training set to build the model and evaluate its performance, and then the final model was evaluated on the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 10 variables screened by RF were HOMA-β, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, urinary sugar, insulin, BMI, waist circumference, weight, age, and group. The best-fitting random-intercept mixed-effects (lm22) model showed that each patient's baseline glucose levels influenced subsequent glucose measurements, but the trend over time was consistent. The LMENN model combines the strengths of LME and BPNN and accounts for random effects. The RMSE of the LMENN model ranges were 0.447-0.471 (training set), 0.525-0.552 (validation set), and 0.511-0.565 (test set). It improves the prediction performance of the single LME and BPNN models and shows some advantages in predicting FPG levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LMENN model built by integrating LME and BPNN has several potential applications in analysing longitudinal FPG monitoring data. This study provides new ideas and methods for further research in the field of blood glucose prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9114,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","volume":"24 1","pages":"313"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mixed-effects neural network modelling to predict longitudinal trends in fasting plasma glucose.\",\"authors\":\"Qiong Zou, Borui Chen, Yang Zhang, Xi Wu, Yi Wan, Changsheng Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12874-024-02442-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate fasting plasma glucose (FPG) trend prediction is important for management and treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a globally prevalent chronic disease. (Generalised) linear mixed-effects (LME) models and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to analyse longitudinal data; however, the former is insufficient for dealing with complex, nonlinear data, whereas with the latter, random effects are ignored. The aim of this study was to develop LME, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and mixed-effects NN models that combine the 2 to predict FPG levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Monitoring data from 779 patients with T2DM from a multicentre, prospective study from the shared platform Figshare repository were divided 80/20 into training/test sets. The first 10 important features were modelled via random forest (RF) screening. First, an LME model was built to model interindividual differences, analyse the factors affecting FPG levels, compare the AIC and BIC values to screen the optimal model, and predict FPG levels. Second, multiple BPNN models were constructed via different variable sets to screen the optimal BPNN. Finally, an LME/BPNN combined model, named LMENN, was constructed via stacking integration. A 10-fold cross-validation cycle was performed using the training set to build the model and evaluate its performance, and then the final model was evaluated on the test set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The top 10 variables screened by RF were HOMA-β, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, urinary sugar, insulin, BMI, waist circumference, weight, age, and group. The best-fitting random-intercept mixed-effects (lm22) model showed that each patient's baseline glucose levels influenced subsequent glucose measurements, but the trend over time was consistent. The LMENN model combines the strengths of LME and BPNN and accounts for random effects. The RMSE of the LMENN model ranges were 0.447-0.471 (training set), 0.525-0.552 (validation set), and 0.511-0.565 (test set). It improves the prediction performance of the single LME and BPNN models and shows some advantages in predicting FPG levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LMENN model built by integrating LME and BPNN has several potential applications in analysing longitudinal FPG monitoring data. This study provides new ideas and methods for further research in the field of blood glucose prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"313\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Research Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02442-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02442-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:准确的空腹血糖(FPG)趋势预测对于2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的管理和治疗非常重要。(广义)线性混合效应(LME)模型和机器学习(ML)通常用于分析纵向数据;然而,前者不足以处理复杂的非线性数据,而后者可以忽略随机效应。本研究的目的是开发LME、反向传播神经网络(BPNN)和混合效应神经网络模型,将两者结合起来预测FPG水平。方法:来自共享平台Figshare存储库的多中心前瞻性研究的779例T2DM患者的监测数据被分成80/20的训练/测试集。前10个重要特征通过随机森林(RF)筛选建模。首先,建立LME模型,模拟个体间差异,分析影响FPG水平的因素,比较AIC和BIC值,筛选最优模型,预测FPG水平。其次,通过不同的变量集构建多个BPNN模型,筛选最优的BPNN;最后,通过叠加积分构建LME/BPNN组合模型LMENN。使用训练集进行10次交叉验证循环,构建模型并评估其性能,然后在测试集上对最终模型进行评估。结果:RF筛选的前10个变量为HOMA-β、HbA1c、HOMA- ir、尿糖、胰岛素、BMI、腰围、体重、年龄、组。最佳拟合随机截距混合效应(lm22)模型显示,每位患者的基线血糖水平影响随后的血糖测量,但随时间变化的趋势是一致的。LMENN模型结合了LME和BPNN的优点,并考虑了随机效应。LMENN模型的RMSE范围分别为0.447 ~ 0.471(训练集)、0.525 ~ 0.552(验证集)和0.511 ~ 0.565(测试集)。它提高了单LME和BPNN模型的预测性能,并在预测FPG水平方面显示出一定的优势。结论:结合LME和BPNN建立的LMENN模型在FPG纵向监测数据分析中具有一定的应用前景。本研究为血糖预测领域的进一步研究提供了新的思路和方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mixed-effects neural network modelling to predict longitudinal trends in fasting plasma glucose.

Background: Accurate fasting plasma glucose (FPG) trend prediction is important for management and treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), a globally prevalent chronic disease. (Generalised) linear mixed-effects (LME) models and machine learning (ML) are commonly used to analyse longitudinal data; however, the former is insufficient for dealing with complex, nonlinear data, whereas with the latter, random effects are ignored. The aim of this study was to develop LME, back propagation neural network (BPNN), and mixed-effects NN models that combine the 2 to predict FPG levels.

Methods: Monitoring data from 779 patients with T2DM from a multicentre, prospective study from the shared platform Figshare repository were divided 80/20 into training/test sets. The first 10 important features were modelled via random forest (RF) screening. First, an LME model was built to model interindividual differences, analyse the factors affecting FPG levels, compare the AIC and BIC values to screen the optimal model, and predict FPG levels. Second, multiple BPNN models were constructed via different variable sets to screen the optimal BPNN. Finally, an LME/BPNN combined model, named LMENN, was constructed via stacking integration. A 10-fold cross-validation cycle was performed using the training set to build the model and evaluate its performance, and then the final model was evaluated on the test set.

Results: The top 10 variables screened by RF were HOMA-β, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, urinary sugar, insulin, BMI, waist circumference, weight, age, and group. The best-fitting random-intercept mixed-effects (lm22) model showed that each patient's baseline glucose levels influenced subsequent glucose measurements, but the trend over time was consistent. The LMENN model combines the strengths of LME and BPNN and accounts for random effects. The RMSE of the LMENN model ranges were 0.447-0.471 (training set), 0.525-0.552 (validation set), and 0.511-0.565 (test set). It improves the prediction performance of the single LME and BPNN models and shows some advantages in predicting FPG levels.

Conclusions: The LMENN model built by integrating LME and BPNN has several potential applications in analysing longitudinal FPG monitoring data. This study provides new ideas and methods for further research in the field of blood glucose prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medical Research Methodology
BMC Medical Research Methodology 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.50%
发文量
298
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Research Methodology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in methodological approaches to healthcare research. Articles on the methodology of epidemiological research, clinical trials and meta-analysis/systematic review are particularly encouraged, as are empirical studies of the associations between choice of methodology and study outcomes. BMC Medical Research Methodology does not aim to publish articles describing scientific methods or techniques: these should be directed to the BMC journal covering the relevant biomedical subject area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信