多发性硬化症的诊断方法:鞘内免疫球蛋白合成的优化算法。

Jorge Ferriz, Cristina Guallart, Pilar Timoneda, Marta Fandos, Javier Lopez-Arqueros, Antonio Sierra-Rivera, Marta Garcia-Hita, Goitzane Marcaida, Maria Carcelén-Gadea
{"title":"多发性硬化症的诊断方法:鞘内免疫球蛋白合成的优化算法。","authors":"Jorge Ferriz, Cristina Guallart, Pilar Timoneda, Marta Fandos, Javier Lopez-Arqueros, Antonio Sierra-Rivera, Marta Garcia-Hita, Goitzane Marcaida, Maria Carcelén-Gadea","doi":"10.1093/labmed/lmae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The kappa-free light chain (κFLC) index has shown its value in detecting the intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the κFLC index for multiple sclerosis (MS) and compare different algorithms proposed in the literature to optimize its use for our population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the results of the oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and κFLC index of 255 patients with suspected MS different optimization strategies were evaluated, for which the optimal κFLC index cut-off thresholds were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best diagnostic performance was achieved by using a reflexive algorithm, in which OCBs are only performed according to the κFLC index result. With a single cut-off (κFLC index = 7.9), an accuracy of 92.2% was obtained (sensitivity = 92.4%, specificity = 92%) with an OCB performance rate of 58.1%. When applying 2 cut-offs (κFLC index = 4.2 and 13), the accuracy was the same (92.2%, sensitivity = 89.6%, specificity = 94%), but the OCB performance rate dropped to 29.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2-step strategy proposed with κFLC determination followed by OCB analysis in the borderline cases appears to be the most suitable solution, further optimized by adjusting the decision thresholds to 4.2 < κFLC index < 13, resulting in high accuracy and the most saving of OCBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94124,"journal":{"name":"Laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic approach for multiple sclerosis: optimizing algorithms for intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Ferriz, Cristina Guallart, Pilar Timoneda, Marta Fandos, Javier Lopez-Arqueros, Antonio Sierra-Rivera, Marta Garcia-Hita, Goitzane Marcaida, Maria Carcelén-Gadea\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/labmed/lmae101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The kappa-free light chain (κFLC) index has shown its value in detecting the intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the κFLC index for multiple sclerosis (MS) and compare different algorithms proposed in the literature to optimize its use for our population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the results of the oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and κFLC index of 255 patients with suspected MS different optimization strategies were evaluated, for which the optimal κFLC index cut-off thresholds were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The best diagnostic performance was achieved by using a reflexive algorithm, in which OCBs are only performed according to the κFLC index result. With a single cut-off (κFLC index = 7.9), an accuracy of 92.2% was obtained (sensitivity = 92.4%, specificity = 92%) with an OCB performance rate of 58.1%. When applying 2 cut-offs (κFLC index = 4.2 and 13), the accuracy was the same (92.2%, sensitivity = 89.6%, specificity = 94%), but the OCB performance rate dropped to 29.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 2-step strategy proposed with κFLC determination followed by OCB analysis in the borderline cases appears to be the most suitable solution, further optimized by adjusting the decision thresholds to 4.2 < κFLC index < 13, resulting in high accuracy and the most saving of OCBs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laboratory medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/labmed/lmae101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:无κ轻链(κFLC)指数在检测鞘内免疫球蛋白合成方面已显示出其价值。我们旨在评估κFLC指数对多发性硬化症(MS)的诊断性能,并比较文献中提出的不同算法,以优化其在我国人群中的应用。方法:根据255例疑似多发性硬化患者的寡克隆条带(ocb)和κFLC指数结果,对不同优化策略进行评价,并计算最佳的κFLC指数截止阈值。结果:采用自反算法,仅根据κFLC指数结果进行ocb诊断,诊断效果最佳。采用单一截止点(κFLC指数为7.9),准确率为92.2%(灵敏度为92.4%,特异性为92%),OCB阳性率为58.1%。采用2个截断点(κFLC指数分别为4.2和13)时,准确率为92.2%,灵敏度为89.6%,特异性为94%,但OCB的符合率降至29.4%。结论:边缘病例采用κFLC测定后进行OCB分析的两步策略是最合适的方案,进一步优化决策阈值,将决策阈值调整为4.2 < κFLC指数< 13,准确率高,可最大限度地节省OCB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic approach for multiple sclerosis: optimizing algorithms for intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins.

Background: The kappa-free light chain (κFLC) index has shown its value in detecting the intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the κFLC index for multiple sclerosis (MS) and compare different algorithms proposed in the literature to optimize its use for our population.

Methods: Based on the results of the oligoclonal bands (OCBs) and κFLC index of 255 patients with suspected MS different optimization strategies were evaluated, for which the optimal κFLC index cut-off thresholds were calculated.

Results: The best diagnostic performance was achieved by using a reflexive algorithm, in which OCBs are only performed according to the κFLC index result. With a single cut-off (κFLC index = 7.9), an accuracy of 92.2% was obtained (sensitivity = 92.4%, specificity = 92%) with an OCB performance rate of 58.1%. When applying 2 cut-offs (κFLC index = 4.2 and 13), the accuracy was the same (92.2%, sensitivity = 89.6%, specificity = 94%), but the OCB performance rate dropped to 29.4%.

Conclusion: The 2-step strategy proposed with κFLC determination followed by OCB analysis in the borderline cases appears to be the most suitable solution, further optimized by adjusting the decision thresholds to 4.2 < κFLC index < 13, resulting in high accuracy and the most saving of OCBs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信