Mingjun Sun , Zhuming Yin , Jiandong Lyu , Lingyan Wang , Weiyu Bao , Longqiang Wang , Qingze Xue , Jiehou Fan , Jian Yin
{"title":"基于随机森林和逻辑回归算法的胸大肌下直接植入乳房重建失败预测:一项针对中国人群的多中心研究。","authors":"Mingjun Sun , Zhuming Yin , Jiandong Lyu , Lingyan Wang , Weiyu Bao , Longqiang Wang , Qingze Xue , Jiehou Fan , Jian Yin","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few studies have been conducted on direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction failure, and consistent conclusions are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors of reconstruction failure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a single center between July 18, 2014, and January 13, 2020, were retrospectively included in this study. Two algorithms, random forest and logistic regression, were employed to construct models that analyzed the complications and risk factors of reconstruction failure. Subsequently, a multicenter external validation was performed for both models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 538 patients in the model construction group and 91 patients in the multicenter external validation group, with 23 and 5 reconstruction failure outcomes, respectively. Random forest analysis revealed that infection and wound dehiscence were the most significant factors leading to reconstruction failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI), infection, and wound dehiscence were correlated with reconstruction failure. The risk of failure was 3.35% higher in overweight (BMI > 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) patients, 9.6% higher in patients with infection, and 42.5% higher in patients with wound dehiscence than that in the control group. The internal validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) value for the random forest model was 0.990, whereas the external validation ROC was 0.736. The internal and external validation ROC values for the logistic regression model were 0.995 and 0.826, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wound dehiscence and infection were the most significant risk factors for DTI breast reconstruction failure, and preoperative weight control was also important.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":"100 ","pages":"Pages 327-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction failure based on random forest and logistic regression algorithms: A multicenter study in Chinese population\",\"authors\":\"Mingjun Sun , Zhuming Yin , Jiandong Lyu , Lingyan Wang , Weiyu Bao , Longqiang Wang , Qingze Xue , Jiehou Fan , Jian Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.11.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few studies have been conducted on direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction failure, and consistent conclusions are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors of reconstruction failure.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a single center between July 18, 2014, and January 13, 2020, were retrospectively included in this study. Two algorithms, random forest and logistic regression, were employed to construct models that analyzed the complications and risk factors of reconstruction failure. Subsequently, a multicenter external validation was performed for both models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 538 patients in the model construction group and 91 patients in the multicenter external validation group, with 23 and 5 reconstruction failure outcomes, respectively. Random forest analysis revealed that infection and wound dehiscence were the most significant factors leading to reconstruction failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI), infection, and wound dehiscence were correlated with reconstruction failure. The risk of failure was 3.35% higher in overweight (BMI > 24 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) patients, 9.6% higher in patients with infection, and 42.5% higher in patients with wound dehiscence than that in the control group. The internal validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) value for the random forest model was 0.990, whereas the external validation ROC was 0.736. The internal and external validation ROC values for the logistic regression model were 0.995 and 0.826, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Wound dehiscence and infection were the most significant risk factors for DTI breast reconstruction failure, and preoperative weight control was also important.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"100 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 327-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007253\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524007253","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction of subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction failure based on random forest and logistic regression algorithms: A multicenter study in Chinese population
Background
Few studies have been conducted on direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction failure, and consistent conclusions are lacking. Thus, this study aimed to comprehensively analyze the risk factors of reconstruction failure.
Methods
Patients who underwent DTI breast reconstruction after mastectomy at a single center between July 18, 2014, and January 13, 2020, were retrospectively included in this study. Two algorithms, random forest and logistic regression, were employed to construct models that analyzed the complications and risk factors of reconstruction failure. Subsequently, a multicenter external validation was performed for both models.
Results
There were 538 patients in the model construction group and 91 patients in the multicenter external validation group, with 23 and 5 reconstruction failure outcomes, respectively. Random forest analysis revealed that infection and wound dehiscence were the most significant factors leading to reconstruction failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that body mass index (BMI), infection, and wound dehiscence were correlated with reconstruction failure. The risk of failure was 3.35% higher in overweight (BMI > 24 kg/m2) patients, 9.6% higher in patients with infection, and 42.5% higher in patients with wound dehiscence than that in the control group. The internal validation receiver operating characteristic (ROC) value for the random forest model was 0.990, whereas the external validation ROC was 0.736. The internal and external validation ROC values for the logistic regression model were 0.995 and 0.826, respectively.
Conclusion
Wound dehiscence and infection were the most significant risk factors for DTI breast reconstruction failure, and preoperative weight control was also important.
期刊介绍:
JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery.
The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.