一项定性研究:乌干达初级卫生保健机构中的慢性病患者对以资源为导向的方法(DIALOG+)的接受程度。

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Racheal Alinaitwe, N Nakasujja, H Birabwa-Oketcho, Akena Dickens, Francois van Loggerenberg, W W Muhwezi, Seggane Musisi, V Bird, S Priebe, N Sewankambo
{"title":"一项定性研究:乌干达初级卫生保健机构中的慢性病患者对以资源为导向的方法(DIALOG+)的接受程度。","authors":"Racheal Alinaitwe, N Nakasujja, H Birabwa-Oketcho, Akena Dickens, Francois van Loggerenberg, W W Muhwezi, Seggane Musisi, V Bird, S Priebe, N Sewankambo","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02681-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic physical illnesses are often associated with significant psychological distress and chronic mental illnesses are often co-morbid with physical illnesses. Efforts to integrate mental health into primary health care in Uganda are underway. However, there are enormous logistical challenges. Effective resource-oriented and evidence-based interventions such as DIALOG + have the potential to improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic conditions. We aimed to assess the acceptability of DIALOG + among patients with chronic physical illnesses in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative aspect of a mixed methods exploratory non-controlled study conducted in chronic physical illness out-patient clinics at two hospitals in Uganda. We conducted fifteen in-depth interviews with patients, ten key informant interviews with clinicians, and four focus group discussions with patients. Thematic data analysis was done through an iterative process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results support the acceptability of the intervention as evidenced by willingness to participate, better relationships between patients and clinicians, and improved control of both physical illnesses and psychological distress. Participants also talked about ways in which the implementation of DIALOG + could be improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIALOG + is acceptable among patients with chronic physical illness in primary health care settings in Uganda.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"25 1","pages":"429"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability of a resource-oriented approach (DIALOG+) among patients with chronic physical illnesses in primary health care-Uganda, a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Racheal Alinaitwe, N Nakasujja, H Birabwa-Oketcho, Akena Dickens, Francois van Loggerenberg, W W Muhwezi, Seggane Musisi, V Bird, S Priebe, N Sewankambo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12875-024-02681-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic physical illnesses are often associated with significant psychological distress and chronic mental illnesses are often co-morbid with physical illnesses. Efforts to integrate mental health into primary health care in Uganda are underway. However, there are enormous logistical challenges. Effective resource-oriented and evidence-based interventions such as DIALOG + have the potential to improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic conditions. We aimed to assess the acceptability of DIALOG + among patients with chronic physical illnesses in Uganda.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a qualitative aspect of a mixed methods exploratory non-controlled study conducted in chronic physical illness out-patient clinics at two hospitals in Uganda. We conducted fifteen in-depth interviews with patients, ten key informant interviews with clinicians, and four focus group discussions with patients. Thematic data analysis was done through an iterative process.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results support the acceptability of the intervention as evidenced by willingness to participate, better relationships between patients and clinicians, and improved control of both physical illnesses and psychological distress. Participants also talked about ways in which the implementation of DIALOG + could be improved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DIALOG + is acceptable among patients with chronic physical illness in primary health care settings in Uganda.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC primary care\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"429\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC primary care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02681-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02681-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability of a resource-oriented approach (DIALOG+) among patients with chronic physical illnesses in primary health care-Uganda, a qualitative study.

Background: Chronic physical illnesses are often associated with significant psychological distress and chronic mental illnesses are often co-morbid with physical illnesses. Efforts to integrate mental health into primary health care in Uganda are underway. However, there are enormous logistical challenges. Effective resource-oriented and evidence-based interventions such as DIALOG + have the potential to improve treatment outcomes for patients with chronic conditions. We aimed to assess the acceptability of DIALOG + among patients with chronic physical illnesses in Uganda.

Methods: This was a qualitative aspect of a mixed methods exploratory non-controlled study conducted in chronic physical illness out-patient clinics at two hospitals in Uganda. We conducted fifteen in-depth interviews with patients, ten key informant interviews with clinicians, and four focus group discussions with patients. Thematic data analysis was done through an iterative process.

Results: The results support the acceptability of the intervention as evidenced by willingness to participate, better relationships between patients and clinicians, and improved control of both physical illnesses and psychological distress. Participants also talked about ways in which the implementation of DIALOG + could be improved.

Conclusion: DIALOG + is acceptable among patients with chronic physical illness in primary health care settings in Uganda.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信