{"title":"基本形式本体中的Fiat曲面。","authors":"Michael Rabenberg, Werner Ceusters","doi":"10.3233/FAIA241313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) class <i>continuant fiat boundary</i> and its subclasses, including <i>fiat surface</i>, are not heavily axiomatized; they have elucidations, not definitions; and the meanings of these elucidations are poorly captured by the relevant BFO axioms. This paper is an effort to make progress in these respects for <i>fiat surface</i>. We identify a range of desiderata for a BFO-conformant view of <i>fiat surface</i>, argue that the GitHub does not satisfy them, argue that the view of fiat surfaces in Arp et al. (2015) does a better job, and supplement that view in ways that do a still better job. Our discussion allows us to, <i>inter alia</i>, present a number of axioms relevant to our topic worthy of consideration for inclusion in BFO or dependent ontologies in specific domains and for specific purposes.</p>","PeriodicalId":90829,"journal":{"name":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","volume":"394 ","pages":"268-282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656323/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiat Surfaces in the Basic Formal Ontology.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Rabenberg, Werner Ceusters\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/FAIA241313\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) class <i>continuant fiat boundary</i> and its subclasses, including <i>fiat surface</i>, are not heavily axiomatized; they have elucidations, not definitions; and the meanings of these elucidations are poorly captured by the relevant BFO axioms. This paper is an effort to make progress in these respects for <i>fiat surface</i>. We identify a range of desiderata for a BFO-conformant view of <i>fiat surface</i>, argue that the GitHub does not satisfy them, argue that the view of fiat surfaces in Arp et al. (2015) does a better job, and supplement that view in ways that do a still better job. Our discussion allows us to, <i>inter alia</i>, present a number of axioms relevant to our topic worthy of consideration for inclusion in BFO or dependent ontologies in specific domains and for specific purposes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":90829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"394 \",\"pages\":\"268-282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656323/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA241313\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Formal ontology in information systems : proceedings of the ... International Conference. FOIS (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA241313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) class continuant fiat boundary and its subclasses, including fiat surface, are not heavily axiomatized; they have elucidations, not definitions; and the meanings of these elucidations are poorly captured by the relevant BFO axioms. This paper is an effort to make progress in these respects for fiat surface. We identify a range of desiderata for a BFO-conformant view of fiat surface, argue that the GitHub does not satisfy them, argue that the view of fiat surfaces in Arp et al. (2015) does a better job, and supplement that view in ways that do a still better job. Our discussion allows us to, inter alia, present a number of axioms relevant to our topic worthy of consideration for inclusion in BFO or dependent ontologies in specific domains and for specific purposes.