TaTME 学习过程的短期和长期影响:一项单一机构研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Helene Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Christophe Zemmour, Mathias Illy, Flora Poizat, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong
{"title":"TaTME 学习过程的短期和长期影响:一项单一机构研究。","authors":"Helene Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Christophe Zemmour, Mathias Illy, Flora Poizat, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03065-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a promising and innovative approach for lower rectal cancer but requires high technical skill and learning process that can affect patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the learning curve of TaTME and then to assess its impact on 5-year oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 54-month period, 94 patients underwent TaTME by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons at our department. To provide a comprehensive overview of success, we used a composite criterion including the most relevant parameters related to the learning process: the conversion rate to an open procedure, TaTME procedure completion, severe postoperative morbidity, mesorectal integrity on macroscopic evaluation, and microscopic margins. Moving average method and cumulative sum analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative time continuously decreased over the entire study period. The success rate stabilised after 14 patients in a parallel and balanced analysis of the two surgeons' experiences. Mesorectal completeness was the most sensitive marker for the TaTME learning process (42.9% vs 71.25%; p = 0.06). The learning process did not significantly affect the postoperative morbidity, conversion rate, or R0 resection. Five-year oncological outcomes were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even among laparoscopically experienced surgeons, the TaTME learning process influences the oncological quality of the resection but not the postoperative morbidity. Gaining an early command of the surgical anatomy and technical skills and understanding the challenges through specific educational sessions are necessary. The results of this study could help generate a comprehensive training program and define necessary prerequisites for prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered in our Clinical Research Unit (2016_LELONG_01). Our database is registered in the clinicalTrials.gov registry: Institut Paoli Calmettes Colorectal Cancer Database (NCT02869503).</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short- and long-term impact of the TaTME learning process: a single institutional study.\",\"authors\":\"Helene Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Christophe Zemmour, Mathias Illy, Flora Poizat, Jean-Philippe Ratone, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10151-024-03065-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a promising and innovative approach for lower rectal cancer but requires high technical skill and learning process that can affect patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the learning curve of TaTME and then to assess its impact on 5-year oncologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over a 54-month period, 94 patients underwent TaTME by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons at our department. To provide a comprehensive overview of success, we used a composite criterion including the most relevant parameters related to the learning process: the conversion rate to an open procedure, TaTME procedure completion, severe postoperative morbidity, mesorectal integrity on macroscopic evaluation, and microscopic margins. Moving average method and cumulative sum analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operative time continuously decreased over the entire study period. The success rate stabilised after 14 patients in a parallel and balanced analysis of the two surgeons' experiences. Mesorectal completeness was the most sensitive marker for the TaTME learning process (42.9% vs 71.25%; p = 0.06). The learning process did not significantly affect the postoperative morbidity, conversion rate, or R0 resection. Five-year oncological outcomes were similar between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even among laparoscopically experienced surgeons, the TaTME learning process influences the oncological quality of the resection but not the postoperative morbidity. Gaining an early command of the surgical anatomy and technical skills and understanding the challenges through specific educational sessions are necessary. The results of this study could help generate a comprehensive training program and define necessary prerequisites for prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study is registered in our Clinical Research Unit (2016_LELONG_01). Our database is registered in the clinicalTrials.gov registry: Institut Paoli Calmettes Colorectal Cancer Database (NCT02869503).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11659337/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Coloproctology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03065-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03065-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经肛门直肠全肠系膜切除术(TaTME)是一种很有前途的治疗下段直肠癌的创新方法,但需要高技术技能和学习过程,这可能会影响患者的预后。我们的目的是确定TaTME的学习曲线,然后评估其对5年肿瘤预后的影响。方法:在54个月的时间里,94例患者在我科由经验丰富的腹腔镜结直肠外科医生行TaTME手术。为了提供成功的全面概述,我们使用了一个综合标准,包括与学习过程相关的最相关参数:开腹手术的转换率、TaTME手术的完成情况、严重的术后发病率、宏观评价的直肠系膜完整性和显微边缘。采用移动平均法和累积和分析。结果:手术时间在整个研究期间持续减少。在对两位外科医生的经验进行平行和平衡的分析后,14例患者的成功率稳定下来。直肠系膜完整性是TaTME学习过程最敏感的标志(42.9% vs 71.25%;p = 0.06)。学习过程对术后发病率、转换率或R0切除没有显著影响。两组间的五年肿瘤预后相似。结论:即使在经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生中,TaTME学习过程也会影响切除术的肿瘤质量,但不会影响术后发病率。早期掌握外科解剖和技术技能,并通过特定的教育课程了解挑战是必要的。这项研究的结果可以帮助制定一个全面的培训计划,并为前瞻性试验确定必要的先决条件。试验注册:本研究已在我公司临床研究室注册(2016_LELONG_01)。我们的数据库已在clinicalTrials.gov注册中心注册:Institut Paoli Calmettes结直肠癌数据库(NCT02869503)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short- and long-term impact of the TaTME learning process: a single institutional study.

Background: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a promising and innovative approach for lower rectal cancer but requires high technical skill and learning process that can affect patient outcomes. We aimed to determine the learning curve of TaTME and then to assess its impact on 5-year oncologic outcomes.

Methods: Over a 54-month period, 94 patients underwent TaTME by experienced laparoscopic colorectal surgeons at our department. To provide a comprehensive overview of success, we used a composite criterion including the most relevant parameters related to the learning process: the conversion rate to an open procedure, TaTME procedure completion, severe postoperative morbidity, mesorectal integrity on macroscopic evaluation, and microscopic margins. Moving average method and cumulative sum analyses were performed.

Results: The operative time continuously decreased over the entire study period. The success rate stabilised after 14 patients in a parallel and balanced analysis of the two surgeons' experiences. Mesorectal completeness was the most sensitive marker for the TaTME learning process (42.9% vs 71.25%; p = 0.06). The learning process did not significantly affect the postoperative morbidity, conversion rate, or R0 resection. Five-year oncological outcomes were similar between the groups.

Conclusion: Even among laparoscopically experienced surgeons, the TaTME learning process influences the oncological quality of the resection but not the postoperative morbidity. Gaining an early command of the surgical anatomy and technical skills and understanding the challenges through specific educational sessions are necessary. The results of this study could help generate a comprehensive training program and define necessary prerequisites for prospective trials.

Trial registration: This study is registered in our Clinical Research Unit (2016_LELONG_01). Our database is registered in the clinicalTrials.gov registry: Institut Paoli Calmettes Colorectal Cancer Database (NCT02869503).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信