食品援助使用障碍、促进因素和建议:来自种族和民族多样化父母的定性研究的见解。

IF 2.4 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Journal of Nutritional Science Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1017/jns.2024.75
Vivienne M Hazzard, Alicia S Kunin-Batson, Amanda C Trofholz, Amy E Noser, Junia N de Brito, Rosabella T Pitera, Jerica M Berge
{"title":"食品援助使用障碍、促进因素和建议:来自种族和民族多样化父母的定性研究的见解。","authors":"Vivienne M Hazzard, Alicia S Kunin-Batson, Amanda C Trofholz, Amy E Noser, Junia N de Brito, Rosabella T Pitera, Jerica M Berge","doi":"10.1017/jns.2024.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to utilising a range of food assistance resources as reported by parents living with or at risk for food insecurity (FI), as well as parents' recommendations for improving utilisation of these resources. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews about parents' perspectives on interventions to address FI were analysed using a hybrid deductive/inductive thematic approach. Parents were drawn from the larger <i>Family Matters</i> longitudinal cohort study (<i>N</i> = 1,307), which was recruited from primary care clinics in Minnesota. Forty racially and ethnically diverse parents (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 38.5 years; 97.5% mothers; 85% parents of colour) were recruited by food security level, with ten parents representing each level (i.e. high, marginal, low, very low). Six overarching qualitative themes were identified, which indicated the importance of (1) comfort level seeking assistance; (2) routine screening to assess need; (3) advertising, referrals, and outreach; (4) adequacy of policies and programmes to address need; (5) resource proximity and delivery; and (6) acceptability of foods/benefits provided. With some exceptions, these themes were generally represented from more than one angle (i.e. as barriers, facilitators, recommendations) and raised as relevant across different types of assistance (e.g. federal food assistance programmes, food pantries) and different settings (e.g. schools, healthcare). This study identified key factors influencing food assistance utilisation across multiple dimensions of access. These factors-which range from psychosocial to logistical in nature-should be considered in efforts to expand the reach of food assistance programmes and, in turn, improve food security among families.</p>","PeriodicalId":47536,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutritional Science","volume":"13 ","pages":"e86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food assistance use barriers, facilitators, and recommendations: insights from a qualitative study of racially and ethnically diverse parents.\",\"authors\":\"Vivienne M Hazzard, Alicia S Kunin-Batson, Amanda C Trofholz, Amy E Noser, Junia N de Brito, Rosabella T Pitera, Jerica M Berge\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/jns.2024.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to utilising a range of food assistance resources as reported by parents living with or at risk for food insecurity (FI), as well as parents' recommendations for improving utilisation of these resources. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews about parents' perspectives on interventions to address FI were analysed using a hybrid deductive/inductive thematic approach. Parents were drawn from the larger <i>Family Matters</i> longitudinal cohort study (<i>N</i> = 1,307), which was recruited from primary care clinics in Minnesota. Forty racially and ethnically diverse parents (<i>M</i> <sub>age</sub> = 38.5 years; 97.5% mothers; 85% parents of colour) were recruited by food security level, with ten parents representing each level (i.e. high, marginal, low, very low). Six overarching qualitative themes were identified, which indicated the importance of (1) comfort level seeking assistance; (2) routine screening to assess need; (3) advertising, referrals, and outreach; (4) adequacy of policies and programmes to address need; (5) resource proximity and delivery; and (6) acceptability of foods/benefits provided. With some exceptions, these themes were generally represented from more than one angle (i.e. as barriers, facilitators, recommendations) and raised as relevant across different types of assistance (e.g. federal food assistance programmes, food pantries) and different settings (e.g. schools, healthcare). This study identified key factors influencing food assistance utilisation across multiple dimensions of access. These factors-which range from psychosocial to logistical in nature-should be considered in efforts to expand the reach of food assistance programmes and, in turn, improve food security among families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nutritional Science\",\"volume\":\"13 \",\"pages\":\"e86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11658953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nutritional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutritional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是根据生活在粮食不安全(FI)环境中或面临粮食不安全风险的家长的报告,探讨利用一系列粮食援助资源的障碍和促进因素,以及家长对改善这些资源利用情况的建议。我们采用演绎/归纳混合主题方法,对半结构式访谈中有关家长对解决粮食不安全干预措施的看法的定性数据进行了分析。这些家长来自明尼苏达州的初级保健诊所,他们来自规模更大的 "家庭事务 "纵向队列研究(N = 1,307)。按照食物安全等级招募了 40 位不同种族和民族的家长(中位年龄 = 38.5 岁;97.5% 为母亲;85% 为有色人种家长),每个等级(即高、边缘、低、极低)有 10 位家长代表。我们确定了六大定性主题,它们表明了以下方面的重要性:(1) 寻求援助的舒适度;(2) 评估需求的常规筛查;(3) 广告、转诊和外联;(4) 满足需求的政策和计划的充分性;(5) 资源的就近提供;(6) 提供的食物/福利的可接受性。除个别情况外,这些主题一般都从多个角度(如障碍、促进因素、建议)进行阐述,并在不同类型的援助(如联邦粮食援助计划、食品储藏室)和不同的环境(如学校、医疗保健)中被提出。本研究确定了影响食物援助使用的关键因素,涉及获取食物援助的多个方面。在努力扩大粮食援助计划的覆盖范围,进而提高家庭粮食安全的过程中,应考虑这些因素(从社会心理因素到后勤因素)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food assistance use barriers, facilitators, and recommendations: insights from a qualitative study of racially and ethnically diverse parents.

The objective of this study was to explore barriers and facilitators to utilising a range of food assistance resources as reported by parents living with or at risk for food insecurity (FI), as well as parents' recommendations for improving utilisation of these resources. Qualitative data from semi-structured interviews about parents' perspectives on interventions to address FI were analysed using a hybrid deductive/inductive thematic approach. Parents were drawn from the larger Family Matters longitudinal cohort study (N = 1,307), which was recruited from primary care clinics in Minnesota. Forty racially and ethnically diverse parents (M age = 38.5 years; 97.5% mothers; 85% parents of colour) were recruited by food security level, with ten parents representing each level (i.e. high, marginal, low, very low). Six overarching qualitative themes were identified, which indicated the importance of (1) comfort level seeking assistance; (2) routine screening to assess need; (3) advertising, referrals, and outreach; (4) adequacy of policies and programmes to address need; (5) resource proximity and delivery; and (6) acceptability of foods/benefits provided. With some exceptions, these themes were generally represented from more than one angle (i.e. as barriers, facilitators, recommendations) and raised as relevant across different types of assistance (e.g. federal food assistance programmes, food pantries) and different settings (e.g. schools, healthcare). This study identified key factors influencing food assistance utilisation across multiple dimensions of access. These factors-which range from psychosocial to logistical in nature-should be considered in efforts to expand the reach of food assistance programmes and, in turn, improve food security among families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutritional Science
Journal of Nutritional Science NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nutritional Science is an international, peer-reviewed, online only, open access journal that welcomes high-quality research articles in all aspects of nutrition. The underlying aim of all work should be, as far as possible, to develop nutritional concepts. JNS encompasses the full spectrum of nutritional science including public health nutrition, epidemiology, dietary surveys, nutritional requirements, metabolic studies, body composition, energetics, appetite, obesity, ageing, endocrinology, immunology, neuroscience, microbiology, genetics, molecular and cellular biology and nutrigenomics. JNS welcomes Primary Research Papers, Brief Reports, Review Articles, Systematic Reviews, Workshop Reports, Letters to the Editor and Obituaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信