Mohammadreza Mahmoudkhani, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Mohammad Karimizadeh Ardakani, Zahra Fathi
{"title":"Validity and test-retest reliability of a modified version of the upper quarter Y balance test in athletes with spinal cord injury and lower limb amputation.","authors":"Mohammadreza Mahmoudkhani, Fatemeh Alizadeh, Mohammad Karimizadeh Ardakani, Zahra Fathi","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2444386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Upper Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-UQ) assesses upper limb dynamic balance in able-bodied individuals but lacks a reliable version for those with disabilities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to introduce a modified YBT-UQ (mYBT-UQ) for physically impaired individuals (PI) and establish its validity and reliability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study involved 33 male athletes aged 18-55, divided into three equal groups: able-bodied, spinal cord injury with trunk control (SCI), and below-the-knee amputation (BKA). To ensure test validity, able-bodied athletes completed both tests. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by repeating the mYBT-UQ seven days after the first test by PI groups. The validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95%) were calculated to assess relative and absolute reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were significant differences and excellent relationships between YBT-UQ and the mYBT-UQ. Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed minimal bias and an acceptable range of agreement. In athletes with BKA, the ICC (2,1) was above 0.90 for both limbs. The SEM ranged from 2.4%-2.7%, and MDC95% ranged from 6.7%-7.5%. In athletes with SCI, the ICC (2,1) ranged from 0.72-0.80. The SEM ranged from 3.1%-3.2% and MDC95% ranged from 8.6%-8.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that the mYBT-UQ is a reliable test to assess upper quarter dynamic balance in athletes with SCI and BKA. However, regarding the small sample size of the study, there is a need to conduct other research to establish the validity of the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2444386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Validity and test-retest reliability of a modified version of the upper quarter Y balance test in athletes with spinal cord injury and lower limb amputation.
Background: The Upper Quarter Y Balance Test (YBT-UQ) assesses upper limb dynamic balance in able-bodied individuals but lacks a reliable version for those with disabilities.
Objective: This study aimed to introduce a modified YBT-UQ (mYBT-UQ) for physically impaired individuals (PI) and establish its validity and reliability.
Methods: The study involved 33 male athletes aged 18-55, divided into three equal groups: able-bodied, spinal cord injury with trunk control (SCI), and below-the-knee amputation (BKA). To ensure test validity, able-bodied athletes completed both tests. Test-retest reliability was evaluated by repeating the mYBT-UQ seven days after the first test by PI groups. The validity was assessed using the Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman plot. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (2,1), standard error of measurement (SEM), and the minimal detectable change with 95% confidence (MDC95%) were calculated to assess relative and absolute reliability.
Results: There were significant differences and excellent relationships between YBT-UQ and the mYBT-UQ. Also, the Bland-Altman plot showed minimal bias and an acceptable range of agreement. In athletes with BKA, the ICC (2,1) was above 0.90 for both limbs. The SEM ranged from 2.4%-2.7%, and MDC95% ranged from 6.7%-7.5%. In athletes with SCI, the ICC (2,1) ranged from 0.72-0.80. The SEM ranged from 3.1%-3.2% and MDC95% ranged from 8.6%-8.9%.
Conclusion: The results indicate that the mYBT-UQ is a reliable test to assess upper quarter dynamic balance in athletes with SCI and BKA. However, regarding the small sample size of the study, there is a need to conduct other research to establish the validity of the test.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.