Gyuri Han , Anat Stern , Yeon Joo Lee , Yuxuan Li , Parastoo B. Dahi , Roni Tamari , Boglarka Gyurkocza , Ann A. Jakubowski , Esperanza B. Papadopoulos , Brian Shaffer , Miguel-Angel Perales , Karam M. Obeid , Jo-Anne H. Young , Genovefa A. Papanicolaou
{"title":"来替莫韦对高风险异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)受者复发 CMV 的预防。","authors":"Gyuri Han , Anat Stern , Yeon Joo Lee , Yuxuan Li , Parastoo B. Dahi , Roni Tamari , Boglarka Gyurkocza , Ann A. Jakubowski , Esperanza B. Papadopoulos , Brian Shaffer , Miguel-Angel Perales , Karam M. Obeid , Jo-Anne H. Young , Genovefa A. Papanicolaou","doi":"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence. This open-label study was conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals received LTV secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14; secondary endpoints included LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death, and LTV-related adverse events at week 14. Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive, n = 33; T cell-depleted HCT, n = 25; cord blood allograft, n = 5). By week 14 post-transplantation, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6% to 27.1%). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVi after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD, CMV-related death, or LTV-related adverse events by week 14 or by week 24. Our data support that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23283,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 105.e1-105.e9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letermovir for Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients\",\"authors\":\"Gyuri Han , Anat Stern , Yeon Joo Lee , Yuxuan Li , Parastoo B. Dahi , Roni Tamari , Boglarka Gyurkocza , Ann A. Jakubowski , Esperanza B. Papadopoulos , Brian Shaffer , Miguel-Angel Perales , Karam M. Obeid , Jo-Anne H. Young , Genovefa A. Papanicolaou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtct.2024.12.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence. This open-label study was conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals received LTV secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14; secondary endpoints included LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death, and LTV-related adverse events at week 14. Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive, n = 33; T cell-depleted HCT, n = 25; cord blood allograft, n = 5). By week 14 post-transplantation, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6% to 27.1%). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVi after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD, CMV-related death, or LTV-related adverse events by week 14 or by week 24. Our data support that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 105.e1-105.e9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663672400811X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation and Cellular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266663672400811X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Letermovir for Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients
We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence. This open-label study was conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals received LTV secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14; secondary endpoints included LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death, and LTV-related adverse events at week 14. Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive, n = 33; T cell-depleted HCT, n = 25; cord blood allograft, n = 5). By week 14 post-transplantation, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6% to 27.1%). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVi after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD, CMV-related death, or LTV-related adverse events by week 14 or by week 24. Our data support that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.