"美好的童年":儿童对跨国家庭的看法和评价。

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-12-05 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541
Alexandra König, Jessica Schwittek, Katarzyna Jendrzey
{"title":"\"美好的童年\":儿童对跨国家庭的看法和评价。","authors":"Alexandra König, Jessica Schwittek, Katarzyna Jendrzey","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In public debates, transnational families are portrayed as a deviation from the norm of \"good childhood.\" In Europe, this is emphasized by the term \"Euro-orphans,\" branding parents' (especially mothers') absence as a violation and scandalizing it. Children's voices are rarely heard in public discourse, and although research is now turning its attention to the \"stayer children,\" they and their perspectives on transnational family life remain underrepresented, especially in Europe. In a German-Polish project, we investigate how children perceive and evaluate transnational family life based on 27 group discussions with 12-14-year-olds (with and without own transnational family experience) in Poland. The analysis shows that (1) the presence of parents is central to the normative pattern of a good childhood from children's perspective, but (2) they use differentiated criteria when assessing (temporary) parental migration, i.e., they do not refer to \"universal\" needs of children. Additionally, (3) children request that they be informed about the migration-decision early on and involved in the organization of the time of separation to make it as acceptable as possible for them. Thereby, they offer interpretations of transnational families that contribute to erode the norm of good childhood. We see our paper as a sociologically and socio-politically relevant contribution to expanding the discussion on transnational families, both from the perspective of children who discuss and problematize transnational family life as more than merely a question of violating the norm of parents' presence, and with our focus on the European region, which provides specific contextual conditions for transnational families.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1470541"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Good childhood\\\": children's perception and evaluation of transnational families.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra König, Jessica Schwittek, Katarzyna Jendrzey\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In public debates, transnational families are portrayed as a deviation from the norm of \\\"good childhood.\\\" In Europe, this is emphasized by the term \\\"Euro-orphans,\\\" branding parents' (especially mothers') absence as a violation and scandalizing it. Children's voices are rarely heard in public discourse, and although research is now turning its attention to the \\\"stayer children,\\\" they and their perspectives on transnational family life remain underrepresented, especially in Europe. In a German-Polish project, we investigate how children perceive and evaluate transnational family life based on 27 group discussions with 12-14-year-olds (with and without own transnational family experience) in Poland. The analysis shows that (1) the presence of parents is central to the normative pattern of a good childhood from children's perspective, but (2) they use differentiated criteria when assessing (temporary) parental migration, i.e., they do not refer to \\\"universal\\\" needs of children. Additionally, (3) children request that they be informed about the migration-decision early on and involved in the organization of the time of separation to make it as acceptable as possible for them. Thereby, they offer interpretations of transnational families that contribute to erode the norm of good childhood. We see our paper as a sociologically and socio-politically relevant contribution to expanding the discussion on transnational families, both from the perspective of children who discuss and problematize transnational family life as more than merely a question of violating the norm of parents' presence, and with our focus on the European region, which provides specific contextual conditions for transnational families.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36297,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Sociology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"1470541\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655495/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1470541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在公开辩论中,跨国家庭被描绘成对“美好童年”规范的偏离。在欧洲,“欧洲孤儿”一词强调了这一点,将父母(尤其是母亲)的缺席标榜为一种侵犯,并使其受到诽谤。在公共话语中很少听到儿童的声音,尽管研究现在正把注意力转向“留守儿童”,但他们和他们对跨国家庭生活的看法仍然没有得到充分的代表,尤其是在欧洲。在一个德国-波兰项目中,我们调查了波兰儿童如何感知和评估跨国家庭生活,基于27个与12-14岁儿童(有或没有自己的跨国家庭经历)的小组讨论。分析表明:(1)从儿童的角度来看,父母的存在对良好童年的规范模式至关重要,但(2)他们在评估(临时)父母迁移时使用了不同的标准,即他们没有提到儿童的“普遍”需求。此外,(3)儿童要求尽早告知他们关于迁移的决定,并参与分离时间的组织,以使其尽可能为他们所接受。因此,他们对跨国家庭的解释有助于侵蚀美好童年的规范。我们认为我们的论文在社会学和社会政治上对扩大关于跨国家庭的讨论作出了相关的贡献,既从儿童的角度出发,他们讨论跨国家庭生活并将其问题化,而不仅仅是违反父母在场的规范的问题,也从我们对欧洲地区的关注出发,这为跨国家庭提供了具体的背景条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Good childhood": children's perception and evaluation of transnational families.

In public debates, transnational families are portrayed as a deviation from the norm of "good childhood." In Europe, this is emphasized by the term "Euro-orphans," branding parents' (especially mothers') absence as a violation and scandalizing it. Children's voices are rarely heard in public discourse, and although research is now turning its attention to the "stayer children," they and their perspectives on transnational family life remain underrepresented, especially in Europe. In a German-Polish project, we investigate how children perceive and evaluate transnational family life based on 27 group discussions with 12-14-year-olds (with and without own transnational family experience) in Poland. The analysis shows that (1) the presence of parents is central to the normative pattern of a good childhood from children's perspective, but (2) they use differentiated criteria when assessing (temporary) parental migration, i.e., they do not refer to "universal" needs of children. Additionally, (3) children request that they be informed about the migration-decision early on and involved in the organization of the time of separation to make it as acceptable as possible for them. Thereby, they offer interpretations of transnational families that contribute to erode the norm of good childhood. We see our paper as a sociologically and socio-politically relevant contribution to expanding the discussion on transnational families, both from the perspective of children who discuss and problematize transnational family life as more than merely a question of violating the norm of parents' presence, and with our focus on the European region, which provides specific contextual conditions for transnational families.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信