神经外科或神经放射干预治疗时间对创伤性脑损伤后预后和护理质量的影响,一项基于登记的观察性研究。

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Wasin Pansiritanachot, Sattha Riyapan, Sang Do Shin, Jirayu Chantanakomes, Netiporn Thirawattanasoot, Wichayada Rangabpai, Bongkot Somboonkul, Joo Jeong, Kyoung Jun Song, Wen-Chiu Chiang, Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin, Kentaro Kajino
{"title":"神经外科或神经放射干预治疗时间对创伤性脑损伤后预后和护理质量的影响,一项基于登记的观察性研究。","authors":"Wasin Pansiritanachot, Sattha Riyapan, Sang Do Shin, Jirayu Chantanakomes, Netiporn Thirawattanasoot, Wichayada Rangabpai, Bongkot Somboonkul, Joo Jeong, Kyoung Jun Song, Wen-Chiu Chiang, Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin, Kentaro Kajino","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00787-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding the effect of time to neurosurgical and neuroradiological intervention on outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Asia-Pacific region is limited. This study evaluates the quality of care and outcomes for TBI patients undergoing neurosurgical and neuroradiological procedures at different timings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult TBI patients who received any neurosurgical or neuroradiological interventions during the year 2015-2022 in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcome Study database were analyzed. The time to intervention, as the main exposure, was classified into three groups (Early, Intermediate, and Delayed) using Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) analysis. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes. W score was utilized to compare the quality of care among exposure groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and interaction analysis were performed to identify the association between the exposure groups and outcomes, reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,780 patients were included. From the RCS analysis, patients were classified into three groups according to time to intervention: Early (< 1.9 h), Intermediate (1.9-4.1 h), and Delayed (> 4.1 h). According to the time to intervention, W score was - 8.6 in the early group, -1.1 in the intermediate group, and + 0.4 in the delayed group. Patients receiving intermediate and delayed intervention showed significantly lower mortality (AOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86 and AOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.90, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early neurosurgical and neuroradiological interventions in TBI patients in the Asia-Pacific region were associated with lower quality of care and higher mortality. The quality of care should be focused and improved during the early hours of TBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660868/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of time to neurosurgical or neuroradiological intervention therapy on outcomes and quality of care after traumatic brain injury, a registry-based observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Wasin Pansiritanachot, Sattha Riyapan, Sang Do Shin, Jirayu Chantanakomes, Netiporn Thirawattanasoot, Wichayada Rangabpai, Bongkot Somboonkul, Joo Jeong, Kyoung Jun Song, Wen-Chiu Chiang, Sabariah Faizah Jamaluddin, Kentaro Kajino\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12245-024-00787-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding the effect of time to neurosurgical and neuroradiological intervention on outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Asia-Pacific region is limited. This study evaluates the quality of care and outcomes for TBI patients undergoing neurosurgical and neuroradiological procedures at different timings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult TBI patients who received any neurosurgical or neuroradiological interventions during the year 2015-2022 in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcome Study database were analyzed. The time to intervention, as the main exposure, was classified into three groups (Early, Intermediate, and Delayed) using Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) analysis. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes. W score was utilized to compare the quality of care among exposure groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and interaction analysis were performed to identify the association between the exposure groups and outcomes, reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,780 patients were included. From the RCS analysis, patients were classified into three groups according to time to intervention: Early (< 1.9 h), Intermediate (1.9-4.1 h), and Delayed (> 4.1 h). According to the time to intervention, W score was - 8.6 in the early group, -1.1 in the intermediate group, and + 0.4 in the delayed group. Patients receiving intermediate and delayed intervention showed significantly lower mortality (AOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86 and AOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.90, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early neurosurgical and neuroradiological interventions in TBI patients in the Asia-Pacific region were associated with lower quality of care and higher mortality. The quality of care should be focused and improved during the early hours of TBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660868/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00787-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00787-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亚太地区关于神经外科和神经放射干预时间对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)预后影响的证据有限。本研究评估了在不同时间接受神经外科和神经放射治疗的TBI患者的护理质量和结果。方法:分析2015-2022年泛亚创伤结局研究数据库中接受任何神经外科或神经放射学干预的成年TBI患者。采用限制性三次样条(RCS)分析将干预时间作为主要暴露时间分为三组(早期、中期和延迟)。结果是住院死亡率和不良神经预后。W评分用于比较暴露组之间的护理质量。进行多变量logistic回归分析和相互作用分析,以校正优势比(AOR)和95%置信区间(CI)报告暴露组和结果之间的关联。结果:共纳入1780例患者。根据RCS分析,根据干预时间将患者分为早期(4.1 h)三组。根据干预时间,早期组W评分为- 8.6,中间组W评分为-1.1,延迟组W评分为+ 0.4。接受中期和延迟干预的患者死亡率显著降低(分别为AOR 0.64, 95%CI 0.47-0.86和AOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.90)。结论:亚太地区TBI患者的早期神经外科和神经放射学干预与较低的护理质量和较高的死亡率相关。在创伤性脑损伤的早期,应重点关注和提高护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of time to neurosurgical or neuroradiological intervention therapy on outcomes and quality of care after traumatic brain injury, a registry-based observational study.

Background: Evidence regarding the effect of time to neurosurgical and neuroradiological intervention on outcomes in traumatic brain injury (TBI) across Asia-Pacific region is limited. This study evaluates the quality of care and outcomes for TBI patients undergoing neurosurgical and neuroradiological procedures at different timings.

Methods: Adult TBI patients who received any neurosurgical or neuroradiological interventions during the year 2015-2022 in the Pan-Asian Trauma Outcome Study database were analyzed. The time to intervention, as the main exposure, was classified into three groups (Early, Intermediate, and Delayed) using Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) analysis. The outcomes were in-hospital mortality and unfavorable neurological outcomes. W score was utilized to compare the quality of care among exposure groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis and interaction analysis were performed to identify the association between the exposure groups and outcomes, reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: A total of 1,780 patients were included. From the RCS analysis, patients were classified into three groups according to time to intervention: Early (< 1.9 h), Intermediate (1.9-4.1 h), and Delayed (> 4.1 h). According to the time to intervention, W score was - 8.6 in the early group, -1.1 in the intermediate group, and + 0.4 in the delayed group. Patients receiving intermediate and delayed intervention showed significantly lower mortality (AOR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.86 and AOR 0.66, 95%CI 0.48-0.90, respectively).

Conclusion: Early neurosurgical and neuroradiological interventions in TBI patients in the Asia-Pacific region were associated with lower quality of care and higher mortality. The quality of care should be focused and improved during the early hours of TBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信