重新评估成人上肢硬体手术中抗生素预防的必要性。

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1177/15589447241307051
Yufan Yan, Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani, Rami Z Abuqubo, Joshua M Cohen, Victoria P Robbins, Aravind Pothula, Steven M Koehler
{"title":"重新评估成人上肢硬体手术中抗生素预防的必要性。","authors":"Yufan Yan, Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani, Rami Z Abuqubo, Joshua M Cohen, Victoria P Robbins, Aravind Pothula, Steven M Koehler","doi":"10.1177/15589447241307051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although it is well established that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed in soft tissue upper extremity cases, there is still no definitive consensus when hardware implantation is involved. We hypothesize that antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary and there is no difference in postoperative surgical site infection rates regardless of preoperative antibiotic administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on upper extremity surgical cases with hardware implantation performed at a single institution amongst 5 hand surgeons between November 2021 and November 2023. Implants included plates, screws, Kirschner wires, and suture anchors. Primary outcome measures were diagnosis of surgical site infection by 14 and 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the type of management used to treat infection. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients were included for analysis-152 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 80 did not. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographic factors, comorbidities, or smoking status. There was no difference in infection rates between the group who received antibiotic prophylaxis and the group who did not. Infection rate in the antibiotic prophylaxis group was 4.6% and in the sans antibiotics group was 2.5%. All infections were treated with antibiotics, and there were no differences in the rates of operative washout and hardware removal between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary in upper extremity surgical cases even when implantation of hardware is involved.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447241307051"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reevaluating the Need for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Adult Upper Extremity Surgery With Hardware.\",\"authors\":\"Yufan Yan, Nathan Khabyeh-Hasbani, Rami Z Abuqubo, Joshua M Cohen, Victoria P Robbins, Aravind Pothula, Steven M Koehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447241307051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although it is well established that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed in soft tissue upper extremity cases, there is still no definitive consensus when hardware implantation is involved. We hypothesize that antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary and there is no difference in postoperative surgical site infection rates regardless of preoperative antibiotic administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on upper extremity surgical cases with hardware implantation performed at a single institution amongst 5 hand surgeons between November 2021 and November 2023. Implants included plates, screws, Kirschner wires, and suture anchors. Primary outcome measures were diagnosis of surgical site infection by 14 and 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the type of management used to treat infection. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 232 patients were included for analysis-152 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 80 did not. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographic factors, comorbidities, or smoking status. There was no difference in infection rates between the group who received antibiotic prophylaxis and the group who did not. Infection rate in the antibiotic prophylaxis group was 4.6% and in the sans antibiotics group was 2.5%. All infections were treated with antibiotics, and there were no differences in the rates of operative washout and hardware removal between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary in upper extremity surgical cases even when implantation of hardware is involved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447241307051\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241307051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241307051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然已经确定在上肢软组织病例中不需要抗生素预防,但当涉及硬体植入时,仍然没有明确的共识。我们假设抗生素预防是不必要的,并且无论术前是否使用抗生素,术后手术部位感染率都没有差异。方法:回顾性队列分析2021年11月至2023年11月间5名手外科医生在同一医院进行的上肢硬体植入手术病例。植入物包括钢板、螺钉、克氏针和缝合锚。主要观察指标是术后14天和30天手术部位感染的诊断。次要结局包括用于治疗感染的管理方式。分类变量比较采用Fisher精确检验,连续变量比较采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:共有232例患者纳入分析,其中152例接受了抗生素预防治疗,80例未接受抗生素预防治疗。两组在人口学因素、合并症或吸烟状况方面没有差异。在接受抗生素预防治疗的组和未接受抗生素预防治疗的组之间,感染率没有差异。抗生素预防组感染率为4.6%,无抗生素组感染率为2.5%。所有感染均使用抗生素治疗,两组手术冲洗率和硬体取出率无差异。结论:在上肢手术病例中,即使涉及硬体植入,也不需要抗生素预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reevaluating the Need for Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Adult Upper Extremity Surgery With Hardware.

Background: Although it is well established that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed in soft tissue upper extremity cases, there is still no definitive consensus when hardware implantation is involved. We hypothesize that antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary and there is no difference in postoperative surgical site infection rates regardless of preoperative antibiotic administration.

Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis was performed on upper extremity surgical cases with hardware implantation performed at a single institution amongst 5 hand surgeons between November 2021 and November 2023. Implants included plates, screws, Kirschner wires, and suture anchors. Primary outcome measures were diagnosis of surgical site infection by 14 and 30 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the type of management used to treat infection. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Results: A total of 232 patients were included for analysis-152 received antibiotic prophylaxis and 80 did not. There were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of demographic factors, comorbidities, or smoking status. There was no difference in infection rates between the group who received antibiotic prophylaxis and the group who did not. Infection rate in the antibiotic prophylaxis group was 4.6% and in the sans antibiotics group was 2.5%. All infections were treated with antibiotics, and there were no differences in the rates of operative washout and hardware removal between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Antibiotic prophylaxis is not necessary in upper extremity surgical cases even when implantation of hardware is involved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信