IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/head.14889
Ida Stisen Fogh-Andersen, Anja Sofie Petersen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen, Kaare Meier
{"title":"Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves as treatment for chronic cluster headache.","authors":"Ida Stisen Fogh-Andersen, Anja Sofie Petersen, Rigmor Højland Jensen, Jens Christian Hedemann Sørensen, Kaare Meier","doi":"10.1111/head.14889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic cluster headache (CCH) is an excruciatingly painful condition that can be difficult to treat sufficiently with the available medical treatment options. The greater occipital nerves (GON) are of major interest in treating CCH, and various invasive treatment modalities, such as stimulating or blocking the nerves, have been applied. Because the terminal segment of the GON has a superficial course, the nerve is also accessible for non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been suggested as a treatment for different chronic headaches, but evidence of the efficacy in patients with CCH is scarce. Additionally, no consensus exists on the optimal placement of the transcutaneous stimulation electrodes or the treatment usage pattern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this explorative open-label clinical study, 36 patients with CCH were treated with TENS of the GON for 8-12 consecutive weeks between August 2021 and October 2023 as a separate part of the study protocol for a trial on stimulation of the GON (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05023460). After a baseline period, TENS was used primarily as a preventive treatment, stimulating for 30 min twice daily at a minimum. The primary outcome was a change in attack frequency and safety with TENS treatment. Secondary outcomes were change in attack duration and pain intensity on the numeric rating scale, abortive treatments, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) with TENS treatment. The change in attack frequency, duration, pain intensity, and use of abortive treatment was analyzed by comparing the baseline data with 4-weekly data from TENS treatment. The study aimed to systematically investigate the effect of TENS of the GON as a preventive treatment for CCH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Weekly attack frequency decreased from a median of 15.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-22.1) at baseline to 11.0 (95% CI 7.4-16.4) with TENS. In all, 13 of the 36 (36%) patients had a minimum 30% reduction in attack frequency. In the group of 30% responders, the number of weekly attacks decreased from 15.8 (95% CI 9.8-24.5) at baseline to 5.8 (95% CI 3.3-10.5) attacks with TENS. Five patients became entirely or nearly attack-free. For the entire cohort, attack duration and pain intensity were also significantly reduced with TENS. The use of oxygen was reduced by 42%, and triptan injections decreased by 55%. Overall, 15 (42%) patients reported a clinically important improvement with TENS treatment, rated on the PGIC scale. The 100 Hz stimulation programs were preferred over 10 Hz. No serious adverse events were registered.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the GON significantly reduced the frequency, intensity, and duration of weekly headache attacks in patients with severe CCH. Not all patients benefitted from TENS, but the treatment responders had a substantial improvement in their cluster headache. TENS treatment was well-tolerated with little or no side effects and could be a relevant supplement to conventional preventive treatment. A standard TENS apparatus is low cost, making the treatment accessible to most patients. This paper includes a detailed, comprehensive description of our clinical application of the therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:慢性丛集性头痛(CCH)是一种极度痛苦的疾病,现有的药物治疗方法难以充分治疗。大枕叶神经(GON)是治疗慢性丛集性头痛的主要关注点,各种侵入性治疗方法,如刺激或阻断神经,都已得到应用。由于颅神经的末段走向较浅,因此也可以对其进行非侵入性的经皮刺激。经皮神经电刺激(TENS)被认为是治疗各种慢性头痛的一种方法,但在慢性头痛患者中的疗效证据却很少。此外,关于经皮刺激电极的最佳放置位置或治疗使用模式也未达成共识:在这项探索性开放标签临床研究中,作为刺激 GON 试验(Clinicaltrials.gov 识别码:NCT05023460)研究方案的一个独立部分,36 名 CCH 患者在 2021 年 8 月至 2023 年 10 月期间接受了连续 8-12 周的 GON TENS 治疗。基线期结束后,TENS 主要用作预防性治疗,每天至少刺激两次,每次 30 分钟。主要结果是发作频率的变化和 TENS 治疗的安全性。次要结果是 TENS 治疗后发作持续时间和疼痛强度在数字评分量表上的变化、中止治疗和患者总体变化印象 (PGIC)。通过比较基线数据和 TENS 治疗 4 周后的数据,分析了发作频率、持续时间、疼痛强度和中止治疗的变化。该研究旨在系统性地探讨对 GON 进行 TENS 作为 CCH 预防性治疗的效果:每周发作频率从基线时的中位数 15.7(95% 置信区间 [CI] 11.2-22.1)下降到 TENS 治疗后的 11.0(95% 置信区间 [CI] 7.4-16.4)。在 36 位患者中,有 13 位(36%)的发作频率至少降低了 30%。在有 30% 反应的患者中,每周发作次数从基线时的 15.8 次(95% CI 9.8-24.5)减少到 TENS 治疗后的 5.8 次(95% CI 3.3-10.5)。五名患者完全或几乎不再发作。在整个队列中,使用 TENS 后,发作持续时间和疼痛强度也显著缩短。氧气使用量减少了 42%,三苯氧胺注射量减少了 55%。总体而言,15 名(42%)患者在接受 TENS 治疗后,根据 PGIC 量表评定,临床症状得到了明显改善。与 10 赫兹的刺激程序相比,100 赫兹的刺激程序更受欢迎。无严重不良事件发生:结论:对 GON 进行经皮神经电刺激可显著降低重度 CCH 患者每周头痛发作的频率、强度和持续时间。并非所有患者都能从经皮神经电刺激疗法中获益,但治疗应答者的丛集性头痛症状得到了明显改善。TENS 治疗的耐受性很好,几乎没有副作用,可以作为传统预防性治疗的相关补充。标准的 TENS 仪器价格低廉,大多数患者都能接受治疗。本文详细、全面地介绍了该疗法的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the occipital nerves as treatment for chronic cluster headache.

Background: Chronic cluster headache (CCH) is an excruciatingly painful condition that can be difficult to treat sufficiently with the available medical treatment options. The greater occipital nerves (GON) are of major interest in treating CCH, and various invasive treatment modalities, such as stimulating or blocking the nerves, have been applied. Because the terminal segment of the GON has a superficial course, the nerve is also accessible for non-invasive transcutaneous stimulation. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has been suggested as a treatment for different chronic headaches, but evidence of the efficacy in patients with CCH is scarce. Additionally, no consensus exists on the optimal placement of the transcutaneous stimulation electrodes or the treatment usage pattern.

Methods: In this explorative open-label clinical study, 36 patients with CCH were treated with TENS of the GON for 8-12 consecutive weeks between August 2021 and October 2023 as a separate part of the study protocol for a trial on stimulation of the GON (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05023460). After a baseline period, TENS was used primarily as a preventive treatment, stimulating for 30 min twice daily at a minimum. The primary outcome was a change in attack frequency and safety with TENS treatment. Secondary outcomes were change in attack duration and pain intensity on the numeric rating scale, abortive treatments, and the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) with TENS treatment. The change in attack frequency, duration, pain intensity, and use of abortive treatment was analyzed by comparing the baseline data with 4-weekly data from TENS treatment. The study aimed to systematically investigate the effect of TENS of the GON as a preventive treatment for CCH.

Results: Weekly attack frequency decreased from a median of 15.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.2-22.1) at baseline to 11.0 (95% CI 7.4-16.4) with TENS. In all, 13 of the 36 (36%) patients had a minimum 30% reduction in attack frequency. In the group of 30% responders, the number of weekly attacks decreased from 15.8 (95% CI 9.8-24.5) at baseline to 5.8 (95% CI 3.3-10.5) attacks with TENS. Five patients became entirely or nearly attack-free. For the entire cohort, attack duration and pain intensity were also significantly reduced with TENS. The use of oxygen was reduced by 42%, and triptan injections decreased by 55%. Overall, 15 (42%) patients reported a clinically important improvement with TENS treatment, rated on the PGIC scale. The 100 Hz stimulation programs were preferred over 10 Hz. No serious adverse events were registered.

Conclusion: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of the GON significantly reduced the frequency, intensity, and duration of weekly headache attacks in patients with severe CCH. Not all patients benefitted from TENS, but the treatment responders had a substantial improvement in their cluster headache. TENS treatment was well-tolerated with little or no side effects and could be a relevant supplement to conventional preventive treatment. A standard TENS apparatus is low cost, making the treatment accessible to most patients. This paper includes a detailed, comprehensive description of our clinical application of the therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信