Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen
{"title":"支持选择性退行性脊柱手术患者康复的出院后护理干预:一项系统综述。","authors":"Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: \"Early active rehabilitation\" and \"Telemonitoring\". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1042-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-discharge care interventions to support patient recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: \\\"Early active rehabilitation\\\" and \\\"Telemonitoring\\\". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1042-1054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-discharge care interventions to support patient recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review.
Purpose: To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.
Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.
Results: A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: "Early active rehabilitation" and "Telemonitoring". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.
Conclusion: The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe