支持选择性退行性脊柱手术患者康复的出院后护理干预:一项系统综述。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x
Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen
{"title":"支持选择性退行性脊柱手术患者康复的出院后护理干预:一项系统综述。","authors":"Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: \"Early active rehabilitation\" and \"Telemonitoring\". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1042-1054"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-discharge care interventions to support patient recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Dyrby Lorenzen, Line Adsbøll Wickstrøm, Mikkel Østerheden Andersen, Leah Yacat Carreon, Jane Clemensen, Tove Faber Frandsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: \\\"Early active rehabilitation\\\" and \\\"Telemonitoring\\\". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1042-1054\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08622-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述支持脊柱手术患者出院后早期恢复的护理干预措施的类型、内容和结果:本系统综述根据 PRISMA 指南进行。文献检索于 2022 年 3 月在 MEDLINE (Ovid)、EMBASE (Ovid)、CINAHL (Ebsco)、PsycINFO (Ovid) 和 Scopus 中进行(2023 年 5 月更新)。鉴于干预措施、结果参数和对照组的异质性,无法将数据集中起来进行荟萃分析。我们进行了专题分析,对护理干预的类型、内容和结果的特点进行了分类:共有 14 篇文章符合资格标准。纳入的研究发表于 2008 年至 2022 年,共纳入 1399 名患者,平均年龄为 42.3 岁至 62.3 岁。报告的干预措施分为两类:"早期积极康复 "和 "远程监控"。在疼痛、功能、生活质量和活动方面,大多数早期积极康复干预与常规护理相比没有差异。与此相反,远程监控干预措施与常规护理相比,在上述所有方面似乎都更有优势:结论:所纳入的研究显示,在不同的环境、人群、干预措施、对照组、随访时间和结果衡量标准下,干预措施各不相同。这种差异性表明患者对出院后护理的需求和偏好并不明确。鉴于研究的异质性和整体质量,进一步开展高质量的研究至关重要。未来的研究应优先确定这些需求,然后再进行干预设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Post-discharge care interventions to support patient recovery after elective degenerative spine surgery: a systematic review.

Purpose: To characterize the type, content, and results of care interventions that support spine surgery patients in their early post-discharge recovery.

Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in March 2022 (updated in May 2023) in MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Scopus. Given the heterogeneity of the interventions, outcome parameters, and controls, data for pooling for meta-analysis was not possible. We performed a thematic analysis to categorize the characteristics of the type, content, and results of care interventions.

Results: A total of 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2022 and included 1,399 unique patients with mean reported ages of 42.3 to 62.3 years. The reported interventions were divided into two categories: "Early active rehabilitation" and "Telemonitoring". As for pain, function, quality of life, and activity the majority of the early active rehabilitation interventions showed no differences compared to usual care. In contrast, the telemonitoring interventions seemed mainly to be in favor of the interventions versus usual care in all of the aforementioned aspects.

Conclusion: The included studies demonstrated diverse interventions across settings, populations, interventions, controls, follow-up times, and outcome measures. This variability suggests unclear patient needs and preferences for post-discharge care. Given the heterogeneity and overall study quality, further high-quality research is essential. Future studies should prioritize identifying these needs before intervention design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信