指导首次心房颤动消融术中非肺静脉触发测试的术前筛查工具。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Alireza Oraii, Corentin Chaumont, Oriol Rodriguez-Queralto, Michal Wasiak, Munveer Thind, Carli J Peters, Erica Zado, Balaram Krishna J Hanumanthu, Timothy M Markman, Matthew C Hyman, Cory M Tschabrunn, Gustavo Guandalini, Andres Enriquez, Poojita Shivamurthy, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Robert D Schaller, Saman Nazarian, David J Callans, Gregory E Supple, Fermin C Garcia, David S Frankel, Sanjay Dixit, Francis E Marchlinski
{"title":"指导首次心房颤动消融术中非肺静脉触发测试的术前筛查工具。","authors":"Alireza Oraii, Corentin Chaumont, Oriol Rodriguez-Queralto, Michal Wasiak, Munveer Thind, Carli J Peters, Erica Zado, Balaram Krishna J Hanumanthu, Timothy M Markman, Matthew C Hyman, Cory M Tschabrunn, Gustavo Guandalini, Andres Enriquez, Poojita Shivamurthy, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Robert D Schaller, Saman Nazarian, David J Callans, Gregory E Supple, Fermin C Garcia, David S Frankel, Sanjay Dixit, Francis E Marchlinski","doi":"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can benefit from targeting non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers. Preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals can guide planning of ablation strategy. This study aimed to create a preprocedural screening tool to identify patients at risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Those who underwent non-PV trigger provocative maneuvers or had spontaneous non-PV trigger firing were included. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia that occurred spontaneously, after AF cardioversion, or after standard provocative maneuvers. The provocative maneuvers included incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min) and an atrial burst pacing protocol. Risk factors associated with non-PV triggers in a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination were used to create a risk score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 163 (8.0%) of 2038 patients had non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. Based on the multivariable model, we created a risk score using female sex (1 point; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]), sinus node dysfunction (1 point; OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]), prior cardiac surgery (1 point; OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]), moderate to severe left atrial enlargement (2 points; OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]), and cardiac sarcoidosis/amyloidosis (4 points; OR, 7.24 [95% CI, 3.03-17.33]). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling showed an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751). Among all first-time AF ablations, 68.1% of procedures were low-risk for non-PV triggers (scores 0-1, 4.3% risk), 17.8% were intermediate-risk (score 2, 10.5% risk), and 14.1% were high-risk (score ≥3, 22.6% risk).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A preprocedural screening tool can classify patients based on their risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. This risk score can guide operators to identify patients who would benefit most from adjunctive non-PV trigger testing. However, further validation is needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":10319,"journal":{"name":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"e013351"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preprocedural Screening Tool to Guide Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Testing in First-Time Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Oraii, Corentin Chaumont, Oriol Rodriguez-Queralto, Michal Wasiak, Munveer Thind, Carli J Peters, Erica Zado, Balaram Krishna J Hanumanthu, Timothy M Markman, Matthew C Hyman, Cory M Tschabrunn, Gustavo Guandalini, Andres Enriquez, Poojita Shivamurthy, Ramanan Kumareswaran, Michael P Riley, David Lin, Robert D Schaller, Saman Nazarian, David J Callans, Gregory E Supple, Fermin C Garcia, David S Frankel, Sanjay Dixit, Francis E Marchlinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can benefit from targeting non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers. Preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals can guide planning of ablation strategy. This study aimed to create a preprocedural screening tool to identify patients at risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Those who underwent non-PV trigger provocative maneuvers or had spontaneous non-PV trigger firing were included. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia that occurred spontaneously, after AF cardioversion, or after standard provocative maneuvers. The provocative maneuvers included incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min) and an atrial burst pacing protocol. Risk factors associated with non-PV triggers in a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination were used to create a risk score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 163 (8.0%) of 2038 patients had non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. Based on the multivariable model, we created a risk score using female sex (1 point; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]), sinus node dysfunction (1 point; OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]), prior cardiac surgery (1 point; OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]), moderate to severe left atrial enlargement (2 points; OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]), and cardiac sarcoidosis/amyloidosis (4 points; OR, 7.24 [95% CI, 3.03-17.33]). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling showed an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751). Among all first-time AF ablations, 68.1% of procedures were low-risk for non-PV triggers (scores 0-1, 4.3% risk), 17.8% were intermediate-risk (score 2, 10.5% risk), and 14.1% were high-risk (score ≥3, 22.6% risk).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A preprocedural screening tool can classify patients based on their risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. This risk score can guide operators to identify patients who would benefit most from adjunctive non-PV trigger testing. However, further validation is needed to confirm these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e013351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013351\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.013351","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:首次接受房颤(AF)消融的患者可以从针对非肺静脉(PV)触发因素中获益。术前对高危个体的识别可以指导消融策略的规划。本研究旨在创建一种术前筛查工具,以识别首次房颤消融期间有非pv触发风险的患者。方法:对2018年至2022年间在宾夕法尼亚大学医院首次行房颤消融的所有患者进行分析。那些经历了非pv触发的挑衅演习或自发的非pv触发射击的人被包括在内。非pv触发器定义为非pv异位心跳触发房颤或持续局灶性房性心动过速,自发发生,房颤转复后,或标准刺激操作后。刺激操作包括增加异丙肾上腺素输注(3、6、12和20-30µg/min)和心房爆发起搏方案。在逐步多变量logistic回归模型中,与非pv触发因素相关的危险因素被用于创建风险评分。结果:2038例患者中,163例(8.0%)在首次房颤消融时出现非pv触发。基于多变量模型,我们使用女性性别(1分;优势比[OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]),窦房结功能障碍(1点;OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]),既往心脏手术(1分;OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]),中度至重度左房扩大(2分;OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]),心脏结节病/淀粉样变性(4分;Or为7.24 [95% ci, 3.03-17.33])。使用bootstrap重新抽样的内部验证显示乐观调整的C统计量为0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751)。在所有首次房颤消融中,68.1%的手术是非pv触发因素的低风险(评分0-1,风险为4.3%),17.8%为中风险(评分2,风险为10.5%),14.1%为高风险(评分≥3,风险为22.6%)。结论:术前筛查工具可根据首次房颤消融时非pv触发因素的风险对患者进行分类。这种风险评分可以指导操作人员识别哪些患者将从辅助非pv触发测试中获益最多。然而,需要进一步的验证来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preprocedural Screening Tool to Guide Nonpulmonary Vein Trigger Testing in First-Time Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Background: Patients undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can benefit from targeting non-pulmonary vein (PV) triggers. Preprocedural identification of high-risk individuals can guide planning of ablation strategy. This study aimed to create a preprocedural screening tool to identify patients at risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation.

Methods: All patients who underwent first-time AF ablation at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2018 and 2022 were identified. Those who underwent non-PV trigger provocative maneuvers or had spontaneous non-PV trigger firing were included. Non-PV triggers were defined as non-PV ectopic beats triggering AF or sustained focal atrial tachycardia that occurred spontaneously, after AF cardioversion, or after standard provocative maneuvers. The provocative maneuvers included incremental isoproterenol infusion (3, 6, 12, and 20-30 µg/min) and an atrial burst pacing protocol. Risk factors associated with non-PV triggers in a stepwise multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination were used to create a risk score.

Results: A total of 163 (8.0%) of 2038 patients had non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. Based on the multivariable model, we created a risk score using female sex (1 point; odds ratio [OR], 1.90 [95% CI, 1.36-2.67]), sinus node dysfunction (1 point; OR, 1.84 [95% CI, 1.04-3.24]), prior cardiac surgery (1 point; OR, 2.26 [95% CI, 1.45-3.53]), moderate to severe left atrial enlargement (2 points; OR, 3.43 [95% CI, 2.46-4.79]), and cardiac sarcoidosis/amyloidosis (4 points; OR, 7.24 [95% CI, 3.03-17.33]). Internal validation using bootstrap resampling showed an optimism-adjusted C statistic of 0.715 (95% CI, 0.678-0.751). Among all first-time AF ablations, 68.1% of procedures were low-risk for non-PV triggers (scores 0-1, 4.3% risk), 17.8% were intermediate-risk (score 2, 10.5% risk), and 14.1% were high-risk (score ≥3, 22.6% risk).

Conclusions: A preprocedural screening tool can classify patients based on their risk of non-PV triggers during first-time AF ablation. This risk score can guide operators to identify patients who would benefit most from adjunctive non-PV trigger testing. However, further validation is needed to confirm these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is a journal dedicated to the study and application of clinical cardiac electrophysiology. It covers a wide range of topics including the diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias, as well as research in this field. The journal accepts various types of studies, including observational research, clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and advancements in translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信