{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of Agile-4 score for liver cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.","authors":"Konstantinos Malandris, Anastasia Katsoula, Aris Liakos, Thomas Karagiannis, Emmanouil Sinakos, Olga Giouleme, Philippos Klonizakis, Eleni Theocharidou, Eleni Gigi, Eleni Bekiari, Apostolos Tsapas","doi":"10.1111/dom.16142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A novel noninvasive score, Agile-4 score, combining liver stiffness measurements, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, diabetes status and sex has been developed for the identification of cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We assessed the performance of Agile-4 for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We searched Medline, Cochrane library, Web of science, Scopus and Echosens website up to May 2024. Eligible studies assessed the accuracy of Agile-4 for ruling-in (≥0.565) and ruling-out (<0.251) liver cirrhosis, using biopsy as the reference standard, at predefined thresholds. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for both Agile-4 thresholds alongside 95% confidence intervals following bivariate random-effect models. We assessed the risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included seven studies with 6037 participants. An Agile-4 score ≥0.565 yielded a pooled specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97). Similarly, an Agile-4 score <0.251 excluded cirrhosis with a summary sensitivity of 0.90 (0.80-0.95). Assuming a cirrhosis prevalence of 30%, the positive predictive value (PPV) for ruling-in cirrhosis was 80%, while the negative predictive value for ruling-out cirrhosis was 95%. Most studies were at high or unclear risk for bias due to concerns regarding patient selection and the blinding status of Agile-4 score interpretation in relation to biopsy results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Agile-4 score performs well for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients. Owing to the relatively low PPV, sequential application of the Agile-4 after fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) testing might further enhance its performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic accuracy of Agile-4 score for liver cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
Aims: A novel noninvasive score, Agile-4 score, combining liver stiffness measurements, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, diabetes status and sex has been developed for the identification of cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We assessed the performance of Agile-4 for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients.
Materials and methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane library, Web of science, Scopus and Echosens website up to May 2024. Eligible studies assessed the accuracy of Agile-4 for ruling-in (≥0.565) and ruling-out (<0.251) liver cirrhosis, using biopsy as the reference standard, at predefined thresholds. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for both Agile-4 thresholds alongside 95% confidence intervals following bivariate random-effect models. We assessed the risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.
Results: We included seven studies with 6037 participants. An Agile-4 score ≥0.565 yielded a pooled specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97). Similarly, an Agile-4 score <0.251 excluded cirrhosis with a summary sensitivity of 0.90 (0.80-0.95). Assuming a cirrhosis prevalence of 30%, the positive predictive value (PPV) for ruling-in cirrhosis was 80%, while the negative predictive value for ruling-out cirrhosis was 95%. Most studies were at high or unclear risk for bias due to concerns regarding patient selection and the blinding status of Agile-4 score interpretation in relation to biopsy results.
Conclusions: Agile-4 score performs well for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients. Owing to the relatively low PPV, sequential application of the Agile-4 after fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) testing might further enhance its performance.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.