美国药学院青霉素过敏教育综合调查

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Wesley D. Kufel Pharm.D., Meghan N. Jeffres Pharm.D., Christopher M. Bland Pharm.D., FCCP, Bruce M. Jones Pharm.D., Mary L. Staicu Pharm.D., Julie Ann Justo Pharm.D., M.S., P. Brandon Bookstaver Pharm.D., FCCP, Lisa M. Avery Pharm.D., FCCP
{"title":"美国药学院青霉素过敏教育综合调查","authors":"Wesley D. Kufel Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Meghan N. Jeffres Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christopher M. Bland Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Bruce M. Jones Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Mary L. Staicu Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Julie Ann Justo Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;P. Brandon Bookstaver Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Lisa M. Avery Pharm.D., FCCP","doi":"10.1002/jac5.2044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacy students should be prepared to evaluate, manage, and de-label penicillin allergies. It is unknown if, and to what extent, education about allergy management is included within the curriculum of United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (USCSP). This study sought to evaluate if and how penicillin allergy education is delivered and assess faculty perceptions of student readiness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational survey was developed by infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy faculty and sent to ID faculty or department chairs at 138 USCSP. The 39-item questionnaire was divided into demographics, incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy education in the program, penicillin allergy topics delivered, and respondents' perceptions of penicillin allergy education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The survey response rate was 53% (73/138). The USCSP demographics included established for &gt;20 years (65.8%), curriculum length of 4 years (83.6%), semester format (74.0%), and class size of 51–100 students (42.5%). Respondents described the incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy delivery (47.9%). Targeted delivery occurred in either the required (57.5%) or elective curriculum (31.4%). Topics included definitions/epidemiology (92.8%), cross-reactivity (92.8%), pathophysiology (88.1%), patient assessment (73.8%), skin testing (71.4%), and desensitization (71.4%). Delivery methods were lecture-based (92.8%) and case-based (66.7%). The median perception (scale of 1–10) of student preparedness for evaluating and managing penicillin allergies after completion of the required and elective curriculum was 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7–7.0) and 5.0 (3.0–7.3), respectively. Most (52.1%) perceived that penicillin allergy education deserves more time. Faculty from 45% of responding USCSP perceived students to be prepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies. Prepared students were more likely to have received case-based education (54.5% vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Penicillin allergy education in USCSP varies considerably. Most ID pharmacist faculty perceived that many students were unprepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies, and that more time should be allocated to penicillin allergy education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"7 12","pages":"1163-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.2044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comprehensive survey of penicillin allergy education among United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy\",\"authors\":\"Wesley D. Kufel Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Meghan N. Jeffres Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Christopher M. Bland Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Bruce M. Jones Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Mary L. Staicu Pharm.D.,&nbsp;Julie Ann Justo Pharm.D., M.S.,&nbsp;P. Brandon Bookstaver Pharm.D., FCCP,&nbsp;Lisa M. Avery Pharm.D., FCCP\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jac5.2044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Pharmacy students should be prepared to evaluate, manage, and de-label penicillin allergies. It is unknown if, and to what extent, education about allergy management is included within the curriculum of United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (USCSP). This study sought to evaluate if and how penicillin allergy education is delivered and assess faculty perceptions of student readiness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational survey was developed by infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy faculty and sent to ID faculty or department chairs at 138 USCSP. The 39-item questionnaire was divided into demographics, incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy education in the program, penicillin allergy topics delivered, and respondents' perceptions of penicillin allergy education.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The survey response rate was 53% (73/138). The USCSP demographics included established for &gt;20 years (65.8%), curriculum length of 4 years (83.6%), semester format (74.0%), and class size of 51–100 students (42.5%). Respondents described the incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy delivery (47.9%). Targeted delivery occurred in either the required (57.5%) or elective curriculum (31.4%). Topics included definitions/epidemiology (92.8%), cross-reactivity (92.8%), pathophysiology (88.1%), patient assessment (73.8%), skin testing (71.4%), and desensitization (71.4%). Delivery methods were lecture-based (92.8%) and case-based (66.7%). The median perception (scale of 1–10) of student preparedness for evaluating and managing penicillin allergies after completion of the required and elective curriculum was 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7–7.0) and 5.0 (3.0–7.3), respectively. Most (52.1%) perceived that penicillin allergy education deserves more time. Faculty from 45% of responding USCSP perceived students to be prepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies. Prepared students were more likely to have received case-based education (54.5% vs. 25.0%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Penicillin allergy education in USCSP varies considerably. Most ID pharmacist faculty perceived that many students were unprepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies, and that more time should be allocated to penicillin allergy education.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"volume\":\"7 12\",\"pages\":\"1163-1171\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jac5.2044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.2044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药学专业的学生应该做好评估、管理和解除青霉素过敏标签的准备。目前尚不清楚美国大学和药学院(USCSP)的课程中是否包括过敏管理教育,以及在多大程度上包括过敏管理教育。本研究旨在评估是否以及如何进行青霉素过敏教育,并评估教师对学生准备情况的看法。方法采用横断面、多中心、观察性调查方法,由138所医学院感染性疾病(ID)药学学院的教授或系主任进行调查。问卷共有39项,分为人口统计、是否纳入有针对性或一致的青霉素过敏教育、提供的青霉素过敏主题以及受访者对青霉素过敏教育的看法。结果调查回复率为53%(73/138)。USCSP的人口统计数据包括成立20年(65.8%),课程长度为4年(83.6%),学期形式(74.0%),班级规模为51-100名学生(42.5%)。应答者描述了合并靶向或对齐青霉素过敏递送(47.9%)。有针对性的交付发生在必修课(57.5%)或选修课(31.4%)中。主题包括定义/流行病学(92.8%)、交叉反应性(92.8%)、病理生理学(88.1%)、患者评估(73.8%)、皮肤试验(71.4%)和脱敏(71.4%)。授课方式以授课为主(92.8%),以案例为主(66.7%)。完成必修课程和选修课程后,学生对评估和管理青霉素过敏的准备程度的中位数感知(量表1-10)分别为5.0(四分位数范围[IQR] 3.7-7.0)和5.0(3.0-7.3)。大多数(52.1%)认为青霉素过敏教育需要更多的时间。45%的USCSP教师认为学生准备好评估和管理青霉素过敏。有准备的学生更有可能接受案例教育(54.5%比25.0%,p < 0.01)。结论USCSP患者青霉素过敏教育差异较大。大多数ID药剂师教师认为许多学生没有准备好评估和管理青霉素过敏,并且应该分配更多的时间进行青霉素过敏教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A comprehensive survey of penicillin allergy education among United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy

Background

Pharmacy students should be prepared to evaluate, manage, and de-label penicillin allergies. It is unknown if, and to what extent, education about allergy management is included within the curriculum of United States Colleges and Schools of Pharmacy (USCSP). This study sought to evaluate if and how penicillin allergy education is delivered and assess faculty perceptions of student readiness.

Methods

A cross-sectional, multicenter, observational survey was developed by infectious diseases (ID) pharmacy faculty and sent to ID faculty or department chairs at 138 USCSP. The 39-item questionnaire was divided into demographics, incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy education in the program, penicillin allergy topics delivered, and respondents' perceptions of penicillin allergy education.

Results

The survey response rate was 53% (73/138). The USCSP demographics included established for >20 years (65.8%), curriculum length of 4 years (83.6%), semester format (74.0%), and class size of 51–100 students (42.5%). Respondents described the incorporation of targeted or aligned penicillin allergy delivery (47.9%). Targeted delivery occurred in either the required (57.5%) or elective curriculum (31.4%). Topics included definitions/epidemiology (92.8%), cross-reactivity (92.8%), pathophysiology (88.1%), patient assessment (73.8%), skin testing (71.4%), and desensitization (71.4%). Delivery methods were lecture-based (92.8%) and case-based (66.7%). The median perception (scale of 1–10) of student preparedness for evaluating and managing penicillin allergies after completion of the required and elective curriculum was 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7–7.0) and 5.0 (3.0–7.3), respectively. Most (52.1%) perceived that penicillin allergy education deserves more time. Faculty from 45% of responding USCSP perceived students to be prepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies. Prepared students were more likely to have received case-based education (54.5% vs. 25.0%, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Penicillin allergy education in USCSP varies considerably. Most ID pharmacist faculty perceived that many students were unprepared to evaluate and manage penicillin allergies, and that more time should be allocated to penicillin allergy education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信