工程教育项目成果评估监测工具

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Muhammet Yorulmaz, Barış Keçeci, Yusuf Tansel İç, Mehmet Gülşen, Berna Dengiz
{"title":"工程教育项目成果评估监测工具","authors":"Muhammet Yorulmaz,&nbsp;Barış Keçeci,&nbsp;Yusuf Tansel İç,&nbsp;Mehmet Gülşen,&nbsp;Berna Dengiz","doi":"10.1002/cae.22812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>During the evaluation process, organizations that accredit engineering programs determine whether a program meets a list of predetermined criteria. One criterion on the list is Program Outcomes (POs). The most common weakness statement is found in this criterion. First, we aim to develop a model that can support program evaluation during the accreditation process. Second, the proposed approach can be used as a feedback tool in the continuous improvement of teaching in engineering programs. The course instructor runs the first module, which predefined learning outcomes and the POs are linked together using an Excel-based software for each activity performed in the course. The second module calculates the scores that reflect the achievement levels of the POs for the whole program. The scores from individual courses are simultaneously transferred to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution module that determines the rating scores of the POs in the program. The proposed system shows which POs are at a satisfactory level and which are lagging behind and need attention. It helps the course administrators to manage the course material proactively. The proposed system is a powerful tool for monitoring and tracking POs, and it is the primary tool used by program administrators to improve the program continuously. It is particularly useful in identifying the weak spots of the program. The successful implementation of the system in our department since 2012 makes us confident that the system could be adopted by other engineering programs.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Monitoring Tool for the Evaluation of Program Outcomes in Engineering Education\",\"authors\":\"Muhammet Yorulmaz,&nbsp;Barış Keçeci,&nbsp;Yusuf Tansel İç,&nbsp;Mehmet Gülşen,&nbsp;Berna Dengiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cae.22812\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>During the evaluation process, organizations that accredit engineering programs determine whether a program meets a list of predetermined criteria. One criterion on the list is Program Outcomes (POs). The most common weakness statement is found in this criterion. First, we aim to develop a model that can support program evaluation during the accreditation process. Second, the proposed approach can be used as a feedback tool in the continuous improvement of teaching in engineering programs. The course instructor runs the first module, which predefined learning outcomes and the POs are linked together using an Excel-based software for each activity performed in the course. The second module calculates the scores that reflect the achievement levels of the POs for the whole program. The scores from individual courses are simultaneously transferred to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution module that determines the rating scores of the POs in the program. The proposed system shows which POs are at a satisfactory level and which are lagging behind and need attention. It helps the course administrators to manage the course material proactively. The proposed system is a powerful tool for monitoring and tracking POs, and it is the primary tool used by program administrators to improve the program continuously. It is particularly useful in identifying the weak spots of the program. The successful implementation of the system in our department since 2012 makes us confident that the system could be adopted by other engineering programs.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Applications in Engineering Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22812\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22812","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Monitoring Tool for the Evaluation of Program Outcomes in Engineering Education

During the evaluation process, organizations that accredit engineering programs determine whether a program meets a list of predetermined criteria. One criterion on the list is Program Outcomes (POs). The most common weakness statement is found in this criterion. First, we aim to develop a model that can support program evaluation during the accreditation process. Second, the proposed approach can be used as a feedback tool in the continuous improvement of teaching in engineering programs. The course instructor runs the first module, which predefined learning outcomes and the POs are linked together using an Excel-based software for each activity performed in the course. The second module calculates the scores that reflect the achievement levels of the POs for the whole program. The scores from individual courses are simultaneously transferred to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution module that determines the rating scores of the POs in the program. The proposed system shows which POs are at a satisfactory level and which are lagging behind and need attention. It helps the course administrators to manage the course material proactively. The proposed system is a powerful tool for monitoring and tracking POs, and it is the primary tool used by program administrators to improve the program continuously. It is particularly useful in identifying the weak spots of the program. The successful implementation of the system in our department since 2012 makes us confident that the system could be adopted by other engineering programs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信