在循环荷载下增强钢筋混凝土梁柱接头的纤维增强聚合物的比较分析

IF 1.2 4区 材料科学 Q4 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
R. Mohanraj, P. Prasanthni, S. Senthilkumar, C. J. Blessy Grant
{"title":"在循环荷载下增强钢筋混凝土梁柱接头的纤维增强聚合物的比较分析","authors":"R. Mohanraj,&nbsp;P. Prasanthni,&nbsp;S. Senthilkumar,&nbsp;C. J. Blessy Grant","doi":"10.1002/mawe.202300351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This research investigates the structural performance and failure mechanisms of beam-column joints reinforced with aramid fiber-reinforced polymer to bolster the durability and seismic resilience of concrete structures. It meticulously selects and proportions materials such as ordinary Portland cement Grade 53 cement, fine and coarse aggregates meeting IS: 383–1970 standards, and water conforming to IS: 456–2000 specifications. Tests confirm the high quality of ordinary Portland cement, crucial for optimal beam-column joint performance, while carbon fiber-reinforced polymer enhances structural integrity with its lightweight composition and substantial tensile strength (3800 MPa–4200 MPa). Failure analysis reveals that non-aramid fiber reinforced polymer wrapped beam-column joint specimens predominantly failed due to concrete crushing, whereas aramid fiber-reinforced polymer-wrapped specimens failed due to fracture in the aramid fiber-reinforced polymer composite, emphasizing stress concentration areas. This study underscores the pivotal role of stress distribution in failure mechanisms and underscores the significance of robust reinforcement design in bolstering structural resilience. These insights advance retrofitting strategies and reinforce techniques aimed at enhancing the longevity and seismic resistance of concrete structures.</p>","PeriodicalId":18366,"journal":{"name":"Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik","volume":"55 12","pages":"1743-1750"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of armid fiber reinforced polymer for strengthening reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic loading\\n Vergleichende Analyse von armierten faserverstärkten Polymeren zur Verstärkung von Balken-Stützen-Verbindungen aus Stahlbeton unter zyklischer Belastung\",\"authors\":\"R. Mohanraj,&nbsp;P. Prasanthni,&nbsp;S. Senthilkumar,&nbsp;C. J. Blessy Grant\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mawe.202300351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This research investigates the structural performance and failure mechanisms of beam-column joints reinforced with aramid fiber-reinforced polymer to bolster the durability and seismic resilience of concrete structures. It meticulously selects and proportions materials such as ordinary Portland cement Grade 53 cement, fine and coarse aggregates meeting IS: 383–1970 standards, and water conforming to IS: 456–2000 specifications. Tests confirm the high quality of ordinary Portland cement, crucial for optimal beam-column joint performance, while carbon fiber-reinforced polymer enhances structural integrity with its lightweight composition and substantial tensile strength (3800 MPa–4200 MPa). Failure analysis reveals that non-aramid fiber reinforced polymer wrapped beam-column joint specimens predominantly failed due to concrete crushing, whereas aramid fiber-reinforced polymer-wrapped specimens failed due to fracture in the aramid fiber-reinforced polymer composite, emphasizing stress concentration areas. This study underscores the pivotal role of stress distribution in failure mechanisms and underscores the significance of robust reinforcement design in bolstering structural resilience. These insights advance retrofitting strategies and reinforce techniques aimed at enhancing the longevity and seismic resistance of concrete structures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik\",\"volume\":\"55 12\",\"pages\":\"1743-1750\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mawe.202300351\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mawe.202300351","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了芳纶纤维增强聚合物增强梁柱节点的结构性能和破坏机制,以提高混凝土结构的耐久性和抗震回弹能力。普通硅酸盐水泥53级水泥、符合IS: 383-1970标准的细、粗骨料、符合IS: 456-2000规范的水等材料,均经过精心选材配合比。测试证实了普通硅酸盐水泥的高质量,这对优化梁柱接缝性能至关重要,而碳纤维增强聚合物以其轻质成分和可观的抗拉强度(3800 MPa - 4200 MPa)增强了结构的完整性。破坏分析表明,非芳纶纤维增强聚合物包覆梁柱节点试件的破坏主要是由于混凝土的破碎,而芳纶纤维增强聚合物包覆试件的破坏主要是由于芳纶纤维增强聚合物复合材料的断裂,强调应力集中区。这项研究强调了应力分布在破坏机制中的关键作用,并强调了坚固加固设计在增强结构弹性方面的重要性。这些见解推进了改造策略和加强技术,旨在提高混凝土结构的寿命和抗震能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of armid fiber reinforced polymer for strengthening reinforced concrete beam-column joints under cyclic loading Vergleichende Analyse von armierten faserverstärkten Polymeren zur Verstärkung von Balken-Stützen-Verbindungen aus Stahlbeton unter zyklischer Belastung

This research investigates the structural performance and failure mechanisms of beam-column joints reinforced with aramid fiber-reinforced polymer to bolster the durability and seismic resilience of concrete structures. It meticulously selects and proportions materials such as ordinary Portland cement Grade 53 cement, fine and coarse aggregates meeting IS: 383–1970 standards, and water conforming to IS: 456–2000 specifications. Tests confirm the high quality of ordinary Portland cement, crucial for optimal beam-column joint performance, while carbon fiber-reinforced polymer enhances structural integrity with its lightweight composition and substantial tensile strength (3800 MPa–4200 MPa). Failure analysis reveals that non-aramid fiber reinforced polymer wrapped beam-column joint specimens predominantly failed due to concrete crushing, whereas aramid fiber-reinforced polymer-wrapped specimens failed due to fracture in the aramid fiber-reinforced polymer composite, emphasizing stress concentration areas. This study underscores the pivotal role of stress distribution in failure mechanisms and underscores the significance of robust reinforcement design in bolstering structural resilience. These insights advance retrofitting strategies and reinforce techniques aimed at enhancing the longevity and seismic resistance of concrete structures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik
Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
154
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik provides fundamental and practical information for those concerned with materials development, manufacture, and testing. Both technical and economic aspects are taken into consideration in order to facilitate choice of the material that best suits the purpose at hand. Review articles summarize new developments and offer fresh insight into the various aspects of the discipline. Recent results regarding material selection, use and testing are described in original articles, which also deal with failure treatment and investigation. Abstracts of new publications from other journals as well as lectures presented at meetings and reports about forthcoming events round off the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信