Sophie Gharaei, Hashim Abbas, Durga Anil Kanigicherla
{"title":"血浆置换和利妥昔单抗预防先前移植物丢失后复发的局灶节段性肾小球硬化的综述。","authors":"Sophie Gharaei, Hashim Abbas, Durga Anil Kanigicherla","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.98155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) often recurs after transplantation, leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss. Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts. Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence. However, the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone, rituximab alone, or a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 47% of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment. Re-recurrence was seen in 25% (1/4) with pre-emptive rituximab alone, and 45% recurrence (9/20) with plasma exchange alone. Re-recurrence was noted in 63% with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence. The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":68893,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","volume":"14 4","pages":"98155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of plasma exchange and rituximab for prevention of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after a prior graft loss.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Gharaei, Hashim Abbas, Durga Anil Kanigicherla\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.98155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) often recurs after transplantation, leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss. Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts. Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence. However, the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone, rituximab alone, or a combination of both.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 47% of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment. Re-recurrence was seen in 25% (1/4) with pre-emptive rituximab alone, and 45% recurrence (9/20) with plasma exchange alone. Re-recurrence was noted in 63% with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence. The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":68893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"volume\":\"14 4\",\"pages\":\"98155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11438932/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志(英文版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.98155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i4.98155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Review of plasma exchange and rituximab for prevention of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis after a prior graft loss.
Background: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) often recurs after transplantation, leading to graft dysfunction and graft loss. Patients who have lost prior grafts due to recurrence are at particularly high risk of re-recurrence in subsequent grafts. Rituximab and plasma exchange have been used pre-emptively to prevent post-transplant recurrence. However, the efficacy of such preventative measures remains unclear.
Aim: To investigate the outcomes of preventative rituximab and plasma exchange for recurrent FSGS in transplant recipients after prior graft loss.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of 11 studies with 32 patients who had experienced prior graft loss due to post-transplant FSGS recurrence and were treated with either pre-emptive plasma exchange alone, rituximab alone, or a combination of both.
Results: Overall, 47% of the 32 patients experienced recurrence despite prophylactic treatment. Re-recurrence was seen in 25% (1/4) with pre-emptive rituximab alone, and 45% recurrence (9/20) with plasma exchange alone. Re-recurrence was noted in 63% with the use of combined plasma exchange and rituximab.
Conclusion: There is a paucity of available evidence in the literature to draw clear conclusions on the benefits of pre-emptive measures to prevent FSGS re-recurrence. The small sample sizes and variations in protocols call for larger and controlled studies to serve this patient population at high risk of recurrence and graft loss.