院外环境中正常体温的维持:铝箔毯与自温毯的试点比较交叉研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley
{"title":"院外环境中正常体温的维持:铝箔毯与自温毯的试点比较交叉研究。","authors":"Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil \"space\" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and \"ambulance\" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket.\",\"authors\":\"Kathleen M O'Leary, Rebecca Henderson, Joanne N Caldwell Odgers, Benjamin N Meadley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil \\\"space\\\" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and \\\"ambulance\\\" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.12.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:低温可增加某些患者的死亡率。医护人员使用棉和箔“太空”毯取暖,但其效果仍不确定。本初步研究旨在评估在院外模拟中棉毯与自温毯的组合与棉毯与箔毯的组合。方法:8名参与者被分配到使用两个棉毯和一个铝箔毯或两个棉毯和一个自温毯进行加热,并在随后的会议中使用替代方法。参与者使用冰背心和风扇降温,直到开始发抖,之后使用升温方法。模拟涉及三种环境的转换:基线(22°C)、冷却/升温(16°C)和“救护车”(27°C)。通过食管探头监测核心温度,通过热敏电阻监测皮肤温度(每分钟记录一次),每5分钟记录鼓室温度和热感觉及舒适度。结果:两组患者热感觉差异较小。对于主要结局,毯子方法之间无显著差异(核心:箔36.98±0.08°C vs自温36.95±0.10°C, P > 0.05)。结论:在院外模拟中,棉与自温毯组合并不比棉与箔毯组合具有优势。未来的研究应该探索其他的变暖方法来优化恒温维持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Maintenance of normothermia in the out-of-hospital setting: A pilot comparative crossover study of a foil blanket versus self-warming blanket.

Introduction: Hypothermia can increase mortality in certain patients. Paramedics apply cotton and foil "space" blankets for warming, yet their effectiveness remains uncertain. This pilot study aimed to evaluate combining cotton blankets with a self-warming blanket versus a combination of cotton blankets and a foil blanket in an out-of-hospital simulation.

Methods: Eight participants were allocated to warming with either two cotton blankets and one foil blanket, or two cotton blankets and one self-warming blanket, with the alternate method applied in a subsequent session. Participants were cooled using an ice-vest and fan until shivering onset, after which the warming method was applied. Simulation involved transitioning through three environments: baseline (22 °C), cooling/warming (16 °C), and "ambulance" (27 °C). Core temperature was monitored via oesophageal probe, skin temperature via thermistors (recorded every minute), and tympanic temperature and thermal sensation and comfort were recorded five minutely.

Results: There were minor differences in thermal sensation. For the primary outcome there was no significant difference between blanket methods (core: foil 36.98 ± 0.08 °C vs. self-warming 36.95 ± 0.10 °C, P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The combination of cotton and self-warming blankets did not exhibit superiority compared to cotton and foil blankets in out-of-hospital simulation. Future research should explore alternative warming methodologies to optimise normothermia maintenance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信