Kevin H. Li PharmD, Chloe Krakauer PhD, Jennifer C. Nelson PhD, Paul K. Crane MD, MPH, Jalal B. Andre MD, Patti K. Curl MD, Esther Yuh MD, PhD, Mahmud Mossa-Basha MD, James D. Ralston MD, MPH, Christine L. Mac Donald PhD, Shelly L. Gray PharmD, MS, AGFS
{"title":"社区居住老年人累积抗胆碱能暴露和白质高强度负担。","authors":"Kevin H. Li PharmD, Chloe Krakauer PhD, Jennifer C. Nelson PhD, Paul K. Crane MD, MPH, Jalal B. Andre MD, Patti K. Curl MD, Esther Yuh MD, PhD, Mahmud Mossa-Basha MD, James D. Ralston MD, MPH, Christine L. Mac Donald PhD, Shelly L. Gray PharmD, MS, AGFS","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Anticholinergic exposure is associated with dementia risk; however, the mechanisms for this association remain unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the association between anticholinergic exposure and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study, a prospective cohort study among adults aged ≥65 years on dementia risk factors. We used data collected through March 2020 for this analysis. The sample included ACT participants who were referred for and had a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and ≥10 years of continuous healthcare enrollment prior to the scan. Our primary exposure was total standardized daily dose (TSDD) of anticholinergics. Outcomes included three semi-quantitative ratings of WMH volume. We used separate linear regression models for each outcome to estimate and compare covariate-adjusted mean values of WMH ratings in each exposure group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 1043 individuals included in the analyses, 28% had no use, 33% had 1–90 TSDD, 15% had 91–365 TSDD, 7% had 366–1095 TSDD, and 17% had ≥1096 TSDD. The mean age was 81 years, most were female (58%) and White race (88%). Compared to those with no use, the ≥1096 TSDD group had a higher (worse) adjusted mean [95% confidence intervals] Fazekas (4.0 [3.8, 4.2] vs. 3.4 [3.2, 3.5]; <i>p</i>: <0.001), Modified Scheltens (14.3 [13.4, 15.2] vs. 12.2 [11.5, 12.9]; <i>p</i>: <0.001), and Age-Related White Matter Changes (5.6 [5.3, 6.0] vs. 4.8 [4.5, 5.1]; <i>p</i> = 0.001). A dose–response relationship was not found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The highest anticholinergic exposure was associated with greater WMH burden. Future studies should focus on longitudinal changes of WMH burden to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying the link between anticholinergics and dementia risk.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 4","pages":"1115-1124"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cumulative anticholinergic exposure and white matter hyperintensity burden in community-dwelling older adults\",\"authors\":\"Kevin H. Li PharmD, Chloe Krakauer PhD, Jennifer C. Nelson PhD, Paul K. Crane MD, MPH, Jalal B. Andre MD, Patti K. Curl MD, Esther Yuh MD, PhD, Mahmud Mossa-Basha MD, James D. Ralston MD, MPH, Christine L. Mac Donald PhD, Shelly L. Gray PharmD, MS, AGFS\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jgs.19325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anticholinergic exposure is associated with dementia risk; however, the mechanisms for this association remain unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the association between anticholinergic exposure and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study, a prospective cohort study among adults aged ≥65 years on dementia risk factors. We used data collected through March 2020 for this analysis. The sample included ACT participants who were referred for and had a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and ≥10 years of continuous healthcare enrollment prior to the scan. Our primary exposure was total standardized daily dose (TSDD) of anticholinergics. Outcomes included three semi-quantitative ratings of WMH volume. We used separate linear regression models for each outcome to estimate and compare covariate-adjusted mean values of WMH ratings in each exposure group.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the 1043 individuals included in the analyses, 28% had no use, 33% had 1–90 TSDD, 15% had 91–365 TSDD, 7% had 366–1095 TSDD, and 17% had ≥1096 TSDD. The mean age was 81 years, most were female (58%) and White race (88%). Compared to those with no use, the ≥1096 TSDD group had a higher (worse) adjusted mean [95% confidence intervals] Fazekas (4.0 [3.8, 4.2] vs. 3.4 [3.2, 3.5]; <i>p</i>: <0.001), Modified Scheltens (14.3 [13.4, 15.2] vs. 12.2 [11.5, 12.9]; <i>p</i>: <0.001), and Age-Related White Matter Changes (5.6 [5.3, 6.0] vs. 4.8 [4.5, 5.1]; <i>p</i> = 0.001). A dose–response relationship was not found.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The highest anticholinergic exposure was associated with greater WMH burden. Future studies should focus on longitudinal changes of WMH burden to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying the link between anticholinergics and dementia risk.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"volume\":\"73 4\",\"pages\":\"1115-1124\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19325\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19325","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:抗胆碱能暴露与痴呆风险相关;然而,这种关联的机制尚不清楚。本研究的目的是检查抗胆碱能暴露与白质高强度(WMH)负担之间的关系。方法:回顾性分析成人思维变化(ACT)研究的数据,这是一项针对年龄≥65岁的成年人进行的痴呆危险因素的前瞻性队列研究。我们使用了截至2020年3月收集的数据进行分析。样本包括转介并进行临床磁共振成像(MRI)扫描的ACT参与者,扫描前连续医疗登记≥10年。我们的主要暴露是总标准日剂量(TSDD)的抗胆碱能药物。结果包括三个WMH体积的半定量评分。我们对每个结果使用单独的线性回归模型来估计和比较每个暴露组中经协变量调整的WMH评分的平均值。结果:纳入分析的1043名个体中,28%没有使用TSDD, 33%为1-90分,15%为91-365分,7%为366-1095分,17%为≥1096分。平均年龄81岁,以女性(58%)和白种人(88%)居多。与未使用TSDD的患者相比,≥1096 TSDD组有更高(更差)的校正平均值[95%置信区间]Fazekas (4.0 [3.8, 4.2] vs. 3.4 [3.2, 3.5];结论:最高的抗胆碱能暴露与更大的WMH负担相关。未来的研究应关注WMH负担的纵向变化,以更好地了解抗胆碱能药物与痴呆风险之间联系的生物学机制。
Cumulative anticholinergic exposure and white matter hyperintensity burden in community-dwelling older adults
Background
Anticholinergic exposure is associated with dementia risk; however, the mechanisms for this association remain unclear. The objective of this study was to examine the association between anticholinergic exposure and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) burden.
Methods
This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Adult Changes in Thought (ACT) study, a prospective cohort study among adults aged ≥65 years on dementia risk factors. We used data collected through March 2020 for this analysis. The sample included ACT participants who were referred for and had a clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan and ≥10 years of continuous healthcare enrollment prior to the scan. Our primary exposure was total standardized daily dose (TSDD) of anticholinergics. Outcomes included three semi-quantitative ratings of WMH volume. We used separate linear regression models for each outcome to estimate and compare covariate-adjusted mean values of WMH ratings in each exposure group.
Results
Of the 1043 individuals included in the analyses, 28% had no use, 33% had 1–90 TSDD, 15% had 91–365 TSDD, 7% had 366–1095 TSDD, and 17% had ≥1096 TSDD. The mean age was 81 years, most were female (58%) and White race (88%). Compared to those with no use, the ≥1096 TSDD group had a higher (worse) adjusted mean [95% confidence intervals] Fazekas (4.0 [3.8, 4.2] vs. 3.4 [3.2, 3.5]; p: <0.001), Modified Scheltens (14.3 [13.4, 15.2] vs. 12.2 [11.5, 12.9]; p: <0.001), and Age-Related White Matter Changes (5.6 [5.3, 6.0] vs. 4.8 [4.5, 5.1]; p = 0.001). A dose–response relationship was not found.
Conclusions
The highest anticholinergic exposure was associated with greater WMH burden. Future studies should focus on longitudinal changes of WMH burden to better understand the biological mechanisms underlying the link between anticholinergics and dementia risk.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.