经皮热消融和化学消融治疗甲状腺癌复发性转移性宫颈淋巴结病的疗效、安全性和肿瘤学结果的比较

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Eman A Toraih, Siva Paladugu, Rami M Elshazli, Mohammad M Hussein, Hassan Malik, Humza Pirzadah, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Salem I Noureldine, Emad Kandil
{"title":"经皮热消融和化学消融治疗甲状腺癌复发性转移性宫颈淋巴结病的疗效、安全性和肿瘤学结果的比较","authors":"Eman A Toraih, Siva Paladugu, Rami M Elshazli, Mohammad M Hussein, Hassan Malik, Humza Pirzadah, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Salem I Noureldine, Emad Kandil","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal and chemical ablation techniques may consolidate recurrent metastatic cervical lymph nodes as alternatives to repeat neck dissection in thyroid cancer patients. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety across modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched for studies on radiofrequency (RFA), microwave (MWA), laser (LA), and ethanol ablation (EA) treating metastatic cervical nodes from thyroid cancer. The outcomes analyzed included treatment response, oncologic control, and complications. Random effects meta-analytical pooling was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 studies (n = 1061 nodes) examining the four ablation methods. Patients showed comparable baseline characteristics and initial lymph node sizes ranging from 0.96 to 1.28 cm. All modalities achieved substantial node volume reduction (88.4 %) and disappearance (62.8 %), with significant biochemical decline (from 6.01 to 1.13 ng/ml, p = 0.18 between groups). MWA showed the highest volume reduction (99.4 %) and disappearance rate (87.6 %) versus slower efficacy of RFA (93.0 %, 72.1 %), LA (77.9 %, 62.5 %), and EA (81.8 %, 58.4 %). New malignancy/metastases risks ranged from 0.03 % to 1.3 % without between-group differences (p = 0.52). Major complications were absent; transient voice changes (0.05%-10.6 %) and neck pain (0.0%-5.9 %) were the main overall complaints. However, overall complication rates significantly varied by modality (1.1%-10.6 %; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thermal and chemical ablation is effective in controlling the metastatic disease burden in patients with thyroid cancer, offering a potentially less morbid and non-surgical alternative to re-operation. Additional prospective data could confirm the long-term equivalent of revision neck dissection and stratify patients based on concomitant Hashimoto's and genomic mutations. Clarifying optimal patient selection and standardizing prognostic indexing could further enhance utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":"58 ","pages":"102180"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative efficacy, safety, and oncological outcomes of percutaneous thermal and chemical ablation modalities for recurrent metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy from thyroid cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Eman A Toraih, Siva Paladugu, Rami M Elshazli, Mohammad M Hussein, Hassan Malik, Humza Pirzadah, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Salem I Noureldine, Emad Kandil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thermal and chemical ablation techniques may consolidate recurrent metastatic cervical lymph nodes as alternatives to repeat neck dissection in thyroid cancer patients. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety across modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four databases were searched for studies on radiofrequency (RFA), microwave (MWA), laser (LA), and ethanol ablation (EA) treating metastatic cervical nodes from thyroid cancer. The outcomes analyzed included treatment response, oncologic control, and complications. Random effects meta-analytical pooling was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 25 studies (n = 1061 nodes) examining the four ablation methods. Patients showed comparable baseline characteristics and initial lymph node sizes ranging from 0.96 to 1.28 cm. All modalities achieved substantial node volume reduction (88.4 %) and disappearance (62.8 %), with significant biochemical decline (from 6.01 to 1.13 ng/ml, p = 0.18 between groups). MWA showed the highest volume reduction (99.4 %) and disappearance rate (87.6 %) versus slower efficacy of RFA (93.0 %, 72.1 %), LA (77.9 %, 62.5 %), and EA (81.8 %, 58.4 %). New malignancy/metastases risks ranged from 0.03 % to 1.3 % without between-group differences (p = 0.52). Major complications were absent; transient voice changes (0.05%-10.6 %) and neck pain (0.0%-5.9 %) were the main overall complaints. However, overall complication rates significantly varied by modality (1.1%-10.6 %; p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thermal and chemical ablation is effective in controlling the metastatic disease burden in patients with thyroid cancer, offering a potentially less morbid and non-surgical alternative to re-operation. Additional prospective data could confirm the long-term equivalent of revision neck dissection and stratify patients based on concomitant Hashimoto's and genomic mutations. Clarifying optimal patient selection and standardizing prognostic indexing could further enhance utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"102180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:热消融和化学消融技术可以巩固复发转移性颈部淋巴结,作为甲状腺癌患者重复颈部清扫的替代方法。本荟萃分析旨在比较不同治疗方式的疗效和安全性。方法:检索四个数据库,检索射频(RFA)、微波(MWA)、激光(LA)和乙醇消融(EA)治疗甲状腺癌转移性宫颈淋巴结的研究。结果分析包括治疗反应、肿瘤控制和并发症。随机效应荟萃分析池化。结果:有25项研究(n = 1061个淋巴结)检查了四种消融方法。患者表现出相似的基线特征,初始淋巴结大小从0.96到1.28厘米不等。所有治疗方式均可使淋巴结体积显著减小(88.4%)和消失(62.8%),生化指标显著下降(从6.01至1.13 ng/ml,组间p = 0.18)。MWA表现出最高的体积缩小率(99.4%)和消失率(87.6%),而RFA (93.0%, 72.1%), LA(77.9%, 62.5%)和EA(81.8%, 58.4%)的疗效较慢。新发恶性/转移风险从0.03%到1.3%不等,组间无差异(p = 0.52)。无主要并发症;短暂的声音变化(0.05% ~ 10.6%)和颈部疼痛(0.0% ~ 5.9%)是主要的主诉。然而,不同手术方式的总并发症发生率显著不同(1.1%- 10.6%;p = 0.003)。结论:热化学消融可有效控制甲状腺癌患者的转移性疾病负担,为再次手术提供了一种潜在的低发病率和非手术替代方案。额外的前瞻性数据可以证实翻修颈部清扫的长期等效性,并根据伴随的桥本氏症和基因组突变对患者进行分层。明确最佳患者选择和规范预后指标可进一步提高利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative efficacy, safety, and oncological outcomes of percutaneous thermal and chemical ablation modalities for recurrent metastatic cervical lymphadenopathy from thyroid cancer.

Background: Thermal and chemical ablation techniques may consolidate recurrent metastatic cervical lymph nodes as alternatives to repeat neck dissection in thyroid cancer patients. This meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety across modalities.

Methods: Four databases were searched for studies on radiofrequency (RFA), microwave (MWA), laser (LA), and ethanol ablation (EA) treating metastatic cervical nodes from thyroid cancer. The outcomes analyzed included treatment response, oncologic control, and complications. Random effects meta-analytical pooling was conducted.

Results: There were 25 studies (n = 1061 nodes) examining the four ablation methods. Patients showed comparable baseline characteristics and initial lymph node sizes ranging from 0.96 to 1.28 cm. All modalities achieved substantial node volume reduction (88.4 %) and disappearance (62.8 %), with significant biochemical decline (from 6.01 to 1.13 ng/ml, p = 0.18 between groups). MWA showed the highest volume reduction (99.4 %) and disappearance rate (87.6 %) versus slower efficacy of RFA (93.0 %, 72.1 %), LA (77.9 %, 62.5 %), and EA (81.8 %, 58.4 %). New malignancy/metastases risks ranged from 0.03 % to 1.3 % without between-group differences (p = 0.52). Major complications were absent; transient voice changes (0.05%-10.6 %) and neck pain (0.0%-5.9 %) were the main overall complaints. However, overall complication rates significantly varied by modality (1.1%-10.6 %; p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Thermal and chemical ablation is effective in controlling the metastatic disease burden in patients with thyroid cancer, offering a potentially less morbid and non-surgical alternative to re-operation. Additional prospective data could confirm the long-term equivalent of revision neck dissection and stratify patients based on concomitant Hashimoto's and genomic mutations. Clarifying optimal patient selection and standardizing prognostic indexing could further enhance utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信