Laura A Dawson, Kathryn A Winter, Jennifer J Knox, Andrew X Zhu, Sunil Krishnan, Chandan Guha, Lisa A Kachnic, Michael T Gillin, Theodore S Hong, Timothy D Craig, Terence M Williams, Ali Hosni, Eric Chen, Anne M Noonan, Eugene J Koay, Rishi Sinha, Michael I Lock, Nitin Ohri, Jennifer A Dorth, Guila Delouya, Anand Swaminath, Jennifer Moughan, Christopher H Crane
{"title":"立体定向体放疗与单独索拉非尼治疗肝细胞癌：NRG肿瘤学/RTOG 1112 3期随机临床试验","authors":"Laura A Dawson, Kathryn A Winter, Jennifer J Knox, Andrew X Zhu, Sunil Krishnan, Chandan Guha, Lisa A Kachnic, Michael T Gillin, Theodore S Hong, Timothy D Craig, Terence M Williams, Ali Hosni, Eric Chen, Anne M Noonan, Eugene J Koay, Rishi Sinha, Michael I Lock, Nitin Ohri, Jennifer A Dorth, Guila Delouya, Anand Swaminath, Jennifer Moughan, Christopher H Crane","doi":"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P = .06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P = .04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P < .001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P = .52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01730937.</p>","PeriodicalId":48661,"journal":{"name":"Jama Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":28.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Sorafenib Alone in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Laura A Dawson, Kathryn A Winter, Jennifer J Knox, Andrew X Zhu, Sunil Krishnan, Chandan Guha, Lisa A Kachnic, Michael T Gillin, Theodore S Hong, Timothy D Craig, Terence M Williams, Ali Hosni, Eric Chen, Anne M Noonan, Eugene J Koay, Rishi Sinha, Michael I Lock, Nitin Ohri, Jennifer A Dorth, Guila Delouya, Anand Swaminath, Jennifer Moughan, Christopher H Crane\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P = .06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P = .04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P < .001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P = .52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01730937.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jama Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":28.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jama Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jama Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5403","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy vs Sorafenib Alone in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: The NRG Oncology/RTOG 1112 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Most patients with locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recur within the liver following systemic therapy.
Objective: To determine whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) improves outcomes in patients with locally advanced HCC compared with sorafenib alone.
Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter phase 3 randomized clinical trial randomized patients with HCC 1:1 to sorafenib or SBRT followed by sorafenib, stratified by performance status, liver function, degree of metastases, and macrovascular invasion. Eligible patients had HCC unsuitable for or refractory to standard local-regional therapies and were candidates for first-line systemic therapy. Data were collected from April 2013 to March 2021, and data were analyzed from July 2022 to August 2023.
Intervention: Personalized SBRT, 27.5 to 50 Gy in 5 fractions.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events, and quality of life.
Results: Of 193 patients randomized, 177 were eligible. Accrual was stopped early due to a change in standard-of-care systemic therapy. Of 177 included patients, 150 (84.7%) were male, and the median (IQR) age was 66 (60-72) years. Macrovascular invasion was seen in 131 (74.0%). As of July 1, 2022, the median OS was 12.3 months (90% CI, 10.6-14.3) with sorafenib vs 15.8 months (90% CI, 11.4-19.2) following SBRT and sorafenib (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 90% CI, 0.59-1.01; 1-sided P = .06). Adjusting for stratification factors, OS was improved with SBRT (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.52-0.99; 2-sided P = .04). Median PFS was improved from 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.4-6.3) with sorafenib to 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.5-11.9) with SBRT and sorafenib (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.40-0.75; 2-sided P < .001). Treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events were seen in 37 of 88 (42%) and 39 of 83 (47%) of patients treated with sorafenib vs SBRT and sorafenib, respectively (P = .52). There were 2 treatment-related deaths in the sorafenib group (death not otherwise specified and liver failure) and 1 in the SBRT and sorafenib group (lung infection). At 6 months, improved quality of life was seen in 2 of 20 (10%) and 6 of 17 (35%) of patients treated with sorafenib and SBRT and sorafenib, respectively.
Conclusions and relevance: In this phase 3 randomized clinical trial, among patients with locally advanced HCC, SBRT was associated with a clinically important but not statistically significant improved overall survival compared with sorafenib alone.
期刊介绍：
At JAMA Oncology, our primary goal is to contribute to the advancement of oncology research and enhance patient care. As a leading journal in the field, we strive to publish influential original research, opinions, and reviews that push the boundaries of oncology science.
Our mission is to serve as the definitive resource for scientists, clinicians, and trainees in oncology globally. Through our innovative and timely scientific and educational content, we aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of cancer pathogenesis and the latest treatment advancements to our readers.
We are dedicated to effectively disseminating the findings of significant clinical research, major scientific breakthroughs, actionable discoveries, and state-of-the-art treatment pathways to the oncology community. Our ultimate objective is to facilitate the translation of new knowledge into tangible clinical benefits for individuals living with and surviving cancer.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
