在亚急性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者中,早期物理治疗比后期物理治疗改善症状的速度更快:随机对照试验

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Kody R Campbell, Prokopios Antonellis, Robert J Peterka, Jennifer L Wilhelm, Kathleen T Scanlan, Natalie C Pettigrew, Siting Chen, Lucy Parrington, Peter C Fino, James C Chesnutt, Fay B Horak, Timothy E Hullar, Laurie A King
{"title":"在亚急性轻度创伤性脑损伤患者中,早期物理治疗比后期物理治疗改善症状的速度更快:随机对照试验","authors":"Kody R Campbell, Prokopios Antonellis, Robert J Peterka, Jennifer L Wilhelm, Kathleen T Scanlan, Natalie C Pettigrew, Siting Chen, Lucy Parrington, Peter C Fino, James C Chesnutt, Fay B Horak, Timothy E Hullar, Laurie A King","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is unclear evidence on when to initiate physical therapy after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in non-athlete, adult population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate physical therapy timing after mTBI through changes in patient-reported and clinically-assessed tools and objective and mechanism measurements of sensorimotor balance control.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was an investigator-blinded randomized control trial (NCT03479541).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at an academic research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred and three participants were randomized to earlier physical therapy (n = 82) or to later physical therapy (n = 121).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>After enrollment, the earlier physical therapy group started rehabilitation within 1 week and the later group started rehabilitation after a 6-week wait period. All participants received similar rehabilitation; 6-week program administered and progressed by licensed physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Secondary outcomes included common patient-reported/clinical assessments of mTBI and objective/mechanism measurements of balance, including novel measures of central sensorimotor integration. Differences between and within the groups on outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effect models, t tests, and effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While both groups significantly improved and reached similar levels on patient-reported outcomes (DHI and secondary outcomes), the earlier physical therapy group had significantly larger and faster rates of improvement compared to later physical therapy. There were differential effects of physical therapy timing on the objective/mechanism-measured outcomes. Specifically, there were significant improvements in sensorimotor time delay for the earlier physical therapy group and no change in the later group. Further, the later group worsened in the motor activation components for balance control while there was no change in the early group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Earlier physical therapy after mTBI can improve symptoms at a faster rate relative to later physical therapy. Earlier physical therapy also showed improvements in sensorimotor aspects of balance control, not seen in the later group. There may be an important window to address central sensorimotor deficits after mTBI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In People with Subacute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, earlier Physical Therapy Improved Symptoms at a Faster Rate than Later Physical Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kody R Campbell, Prokopios Antonellis, Robert J Peterka, Jennifer L Wilhelm, Kathleen T Scanlan, Natalie C Pettigrew, Siting Chen, Lucy Parrington, Peter C Fino, James C Chesnutt, Fay B Horak, Timothy E Hullar, Laurie A King\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzae180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There is unclear evidence on when to initiate physical therapy after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in non-athlete, adult population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to investigate physical therapy timing after mTBI through changes in patient-reported and clinically-assessed tools and objective and mechanism measurements of sensorimotor balance control.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study was an investigator-blinded randomized control trial (NCT03479541).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study took place at an academic research center.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Two hundred and three participants were randomized to earlier physical therapy (n = 82) or to later physical therapy (n = 121).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>After enrollment, the earlier physical therapy group started rehabilitation within 1 week and the later group started rehabilitation after a 6-week wait period. All participants received similar rehabilitation; 6-week program administered and progressed by licensed physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Secondary outcomes included common patient-reported/clinical assessments of mTBI and objective/mechanism measurements of balance, including novel measures of central sensorimotor integration. Differences between and within the groups on outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effect models, t tests, and effect sizes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While both groups significantly improved and reached similar levels on patient-reported outcomes (DHI and secondary outcomes), the earlier physical therapy group had significantly larger and faster rates of improvement compared to later physical therapy. There were differential effects of physical therapy timing on the objective/mechanism-measured outcomes. Specifically, there were significant improvements in sensorimotor time delay for the earlier physical therapy group and no change in the later group. Further, the later group worsened in the motor activation components for balance control while there was no change in the early group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Earlier physical therapy after mTBI can improve symptoms at a faster rate relative to later physical therapy. Earlier physical therapy also showed improvements in sensorimotor aspects of balance control, not seen in the later group. There may be an important window to address central sensorimotor deficits after mTBI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:对于非运动员成年人群轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)后何时开始物理治疗尚无明确证据。目的:本研究的目的是通过患者报告和临床评估工具的变化以及感觉运动平衡控制的客观和机制测量来研究mTBI后的物理治疗时机。设计:本研究为研究者盲法随机对照试验(NCT03479541)。环境:研究在一个学术研究中心进行。参与者:203名参与者随机分为早期物理治疗组(n = 82)和后期物理治疗组(n = 121)。干预:入组后,早期物理治疗组1周内开始康复,后治疗组等待6周后开始康复。所有参与者都接受了类似的康复治疗;为期6周的项目由有执照的物理治疗师管理和推进。主要结局和测量:主要结局为头晕障碍量表(DHI)。次要结果包括常见的患者报告/临床mTBI评估和平衡的客观/机制测量,包括中枢感觉运动整合的新测量。采用线性混合效应模型、t检验和效应大小来检验组间和组内结果的差异。结果:虽然两组在患者报告的结果(DHI和次要结果)上都有显著改善,并且达到了相似的水平,但与后来的物理治疗相比,早期物理治疗组有明显更大更快的改善速度。物理治疗时间对客观/机制测量结果有不同的影响。具体来说,早期物理治疗组在感觉运动时间延迟方面有显著改善,而后期物理治疗组没有变化。此外,后期组在平衡控制的运动激活成分方面恶化,而早期组没有变化。结论及意义:mTBI术后早期物理治疗比后期物理治疗改善症状的速度更快。早期的物理治疗也显示了平衡控制的感觉运动方面的改善,而在后来的组中没有看到。这可能是解决mTBI后中枢感觉运动缺陷的一个重要窗口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In People with Subacute Mild Traumatic Brain Injury, earlier Physical Therapy Improved Symptoms at a Faster Rate than Later Physical Therapy: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: There is unclear evidence on when to initiate physical therapy after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) in non-athlete, adult population.

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate physical therapy timing after mTBI through changes in patient-reported and clinically-assessed tools and objective and mechanism measurements of sensorimotor balance control.

Design: This study was an investigator-blinded randomized control trial (NCT03479541).

Setting: The study took place at an academic research center.

Participants: Two hundred and three participants were randomized to earlier physical therapy (n = 82) or to later physical therapy (n = 121).

Intervention: After enrollment, the earlier physical therapy group started rehabilitation within 1 week and the later group started rehabilitation after a 6-week wait period. All participants received similar rehabilitation; 6-week program administered and progressed by licensed physical therapists.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). Secondary outcomes included common patient-reported/clinical assessments of mTBI and objective/mechanism measurements of balance, including novel measures of central sensorimotor integration. Differences between and within the groups on outcomes were examined with linear mixed-effect models, t tests, and effect sizes.

Results: While both groups significantly improved and reached similar levels on patient-reported outcomes (DHI and secondary outcomes), the earlier physical therapy group had significantly larger and faster rates of improvement compared to later physical therapy. There were differential effects of physical therapy timing on the objective/mechanism-measured outcomes. Specifically, there were significant improvements in sensorimotor time delay for the earlier physical therapy group and no change in the later group. Further, the later group worsened in the motor activation components for balance control while there was no change in the early group.

Conclusion and relevance: Earlier physical therapy after mTBI can improve symptoms at a faster rate relative to later physical therapy. Earlier physical therapy also showed improvements in sensorimotor aspects of balance control, not seen in the later group. There may be an important window to address central sensorimotor deficits after mTBI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信