肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂治疗IBD的肺毒性评估:基于美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Sichen Sun, Xuan Shi, Mengling Ouyang, Shupeng Zou, Yazheng Zhao, Qian Cheng
{"title":"肿瘤坏死因子α抑制剂治疗IBD的肺毒性评估:基于美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界研究。","authors":"Sichen Sun, Xuan Shi, Mengling Ouyang, Shupeng Zou, Yazheng Zhao, Qian Cheng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2444580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but there is still a lack of systematic risk assessment for pulmonary toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the pulmonary-related risk signals for four TNF-α inhibitors using the disproportionality analysis and also compared them with the pulmonary-related signals of seven other therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8736 reports of pulmonary-related adverse events (AEs) to TNF-α inhibitors as the 'primary suspect (PS)' therapies. The median time to incident for pulmonary-related AEs was 148 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-721) days. TNF-α inhibitors exhibited the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity compared to Interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) inhibitors, Integrin blockers, Jak inhibitors, and S1P receptor modulator. Golimumab exhibited the strongest signal compared to infliximab, certolizumab pegol, and adalimumab. The strongest signal corresponding to pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary thrombosis, and pulmonary fibrosis is golimumab, infliximab, infliximab, natalizumab, upadacitinib, and adalimumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TNF-α inhibitors had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other control therapies. Golimumab had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other TNF-α inhibitors. When TNF-α inhibitors are used in the treatment of IBD, pulmonary-related AEs should be vigilant.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pulmonary toxicity assessment of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in the treatment of IBD: a real world study based on US food and drug administration adverse events reporting system (FAERS).\",\"authors\":\"Sichen Sun, Xuan Shi, Mengling Ouyang, Shupeng Zou, Yazheng Zhao, Qian Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2024.2444580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but there is still a lack of systematic risk assessment for pulmonary toxicity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We calculated the pulmonary-related risk signals for four TNF-α inhibitors using the disproportionality analysis and also compared them with the pulmonary-related signals of seven other therapies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 8736 reports of pulmonary-related adverse events (AEs) to TNF-α inhibitors as the 'primary suspect (PS)' therapies. The median time to incident for pulmonary-related AEs was 148 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-721) days. TNF-α inhibitors exhibited the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity compared to Interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) inhibitors, Integrin blockers, Jak inhibitors, and S1P receptor modulator. Golimumab exhibited the strongest signal compared to infliximab, certolizumab pegol, and adalimumab. The strongest signal corresponding to pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary thrombosis, and pulmonary fibrosis is golimumab, infliximab, infliximab, natalizumab, upadacitinib, and adalimumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TNF-α inhibitors had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other control therapies. Golimumab had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other TNF-α inhibitors. When TNF-α inhibitors are used in the treatment of IBD, pulmonary-related AEs should be vigilant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2444580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2444580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肿瘤坏死因子α (TNF-α)抑制剂广泛用于治疗炎症性肠病(IBD),但仍缺乏系统的肺毒性风险评估。方法:我们使用歧化分析计算了四种TNF-α抑制剂的肺相关风险信号,并将其与其他七种治疗方法的肺相关信号进行了比较。结果:有8736例将TNF-α抑制剂作为“主要怀疑(PS)”治疗的肺相关不良事件(ae)报告。肺相关不良事件发生的中位时间为148天(四分位间距[IQR] 21-721)。与白细胞介素12/23 (IL-12/23)抑制剂、整合素阻滞剂、Jak抑制剂和S1P受体调节剂相比,TNF-α抑制剂表现出最强的肺毒性信号。与英夫利昔单抗、certolizumab pegol和阿达木单抗相比,Golimumab表现出最强的信号。与肺炎、肺结核、哮喘、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、肺血栓形成和肺纤维化相对应的最强信号是golimumab、英夫利昔单抗、英夫利昔单抗、natalizumab、upadacitinib和adalimumab。结论:与其他对照治疗相比,TNF-α抑制剂具有最强的肺毒性信号。与其他TNF-α抑制剂相比,Golimumab具有最强的肺毒性信号。当TNF-α抑制剂用于IBD治疗时,应警惕肺相关ae。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pulmonary toxicity assessment of tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors in the treatment of IBD: a real world study based on US food and drug administration adverse events reporting system (FAERS).

Background: Tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but there is still a lack of systematic risk assessment for pulmonary toxicity.

Methods: We calculated the pulmonary-related risk signals for four TNF-α inhibitors using the disproportionality analysis and also compared them with the pulmonary-related signals of seven other therapies.

Results: There were 8736 reports of pulmonary-related adverse events (AEs) to TNF-α inhibitors as the 'primary suspect (PS)' therapies. The median time to incident for pulmonary-related AEs was 148 (interquartile range [IQR] 21-721) days. TNF-α inhibitors exhibited the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity compared to Interleukin 12/23 (IL-12/23) inhibitors, Integrin blockers, Jak inhibitors, and S1P receptor modulator. Golimumab exhibited the strongest signal compared to infliximab, certolizumab pegol, and adalimumab. The strongest signal corresponding to pneumonia, pulmonary tuberculosis, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary thrombosis, and pulmonary fibrosis is golimumab, infliximab, infliximab, natalizumab, upadacitinib, and adalimumab.

Conclusions: TNF-α inhibitors had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other control therapies. Golimumab had the strongest signal of pulmonary toxicity relative to other TNF-α inhibitors. When TNF-α inhibitors are used in the treatment of IBD, pulmonary-related AEs should be vigilant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信