雾化高剂量皮质类固醇作为成人哮喘加重的附加治疗:一项随机对照试验

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Nat Chatchairatanavej, Nattaya Chormai, Winchana Srivilaithon, Chitlada Limjindaporn, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Jiraporn Sri-On
{"title":"雾化高剂量皮质类固醇作为成人哮喘加重的附加治疗:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Nat Chatchairatanavej, Nattaya Chormai, Winchana Srivilaithon, Chitlada Limjindaporn, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Jiraporn Sri-On","doi":"10.1136/emermed-2024-213893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HDICS) in asthma exacerbations in adults is insufficient. This study compares the treatment outcomes of HDICS as add-on therapy to the outcomes of standard treatment in adult patients with acute asthma exacerbation in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted in the ED in Thailand between March 2022 and April 2023. Adult patients with asthma exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo (normal saline) or HDICS (budesonide 9000 µg) nebulisation combined with beta agonist and ipratropium within the first hour. The primary endpoints were length of ED stay, hospital admission and ED revisit. The secondary endpoints were dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay and home exacerbation after ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 44 patients received a HDICS and 44 patients were placed in the control group. The HDICS group had a significantly shorter ED length of stay (adjusted mean difference -133.6 min; 95% CI -242.4 to -24.8 min; p=0.016), and a higher proportion of ED discharged home within 8 and 16 hours compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in hospital admission rates, ED revisit, dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay or home exacerbation after ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HDICS may be useful as an add-on therapy to standard treatment for asthma exacerbation in adults to reduce ED stay.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>TCTR20201214001.</p>","PeriodicalId":11532,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nebulised high-dose corticosteroids as add-on therapy for adults with asthma exacerbation: a randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kumpol Kornthatchapong, Nat Chatchairatanavej, Nattaya Chormai, Winchana Srivilaithon, Chitlada Limjindaporn, Narongkorn Saiphoklang, Jiraporn Sri-On\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/emermed-2024-213893\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence regarding high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HDICS) in asthma exacerbations in adults is insufficient. This study compares the treatment outcomes of HDICS as add-on therapy to the outcomes of standard treatment in adult patients with acute asthma exacerbation in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted in the ED in Thailand between March 2022 and April 2023. Adult patients with asthma exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo (normal saline) or HDICS (budesonide 9000 µg) nebulisation combined with beta agonist and ipratropium within the first hour. The primary endpoints were length of ED stay, hospital admission and ED revisit. The secondary endpoints were dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay and home exacerbation after ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 44 patients received a HDICS and 44 patients were placed in the control group. The HDICS group had a significantly shorter ED length of stay (adjusted mean difference -133.6 min; 95% CI -242.4 to -24.8 min; p=0.016), and a higher proportion of ED discharged home within 8 and 16 hours compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in hospital admission rates, ED revisit, dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay or home exacerbation after ED discharge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HDICS may be useful as an add-on therapy to standard treatment for asthma exacerbation in adults to reduce ED stay.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>TCTR20201214001.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"91-97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213893\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2024-213893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大剂量吸入皮质类固醇(HDICS)治疗成人哮喘加重的证据不足。该研究比较了HDICS作为附加治疗的治疗结果与ED中成人急性哮喘加重患者的标准治疗结果。方法:这是一项单中心、三盲、随机对照试验,于2022年3月至2023年4月在泰国ED进行。哮喘发作的成年患者被随机分配在第一个小时内接受安慰剂(生理盐水)或HDICS(布地奈德9000µg)雾化联合β受体激动剂和异丙托品。主要终点为急诊科住院时间、住院时间和急诊科重访时间。次要终点是呼吸困难评分、肺功能、住院时间和急诊科出院后的家庭加重。结果:88例患者被随机分为两组:44例患者接受HDICS治疗,44例患者作为对照组。HDICS组ED停留时间明显缩短(调整后平均差-133.6 min;95% CI -242.4 ~ -24.8 min;p=0.016), ED在8小时和16小时内出院的比例高于对照组。然而,两组在住院率、急诊科重访、呼吸困难程度、肺功能、住院时间或急诊科出院后家庭加重方面无显著差异。结论:HDICS可作为成人哮喘加重标准治疗的附加治疗,以减少ED的停留时间。试验注册号:TCTR20201214001。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nebulised high-dose corticosteroids as add-on therapy for adults with asthma exacerbation: a randomised controlled trial.

Background: Evidence regarding high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (HDICS) in asthma exacerbations in adults is insufficient. This study compares the treatment outcomes of HDICS as add-on therapy to the outcomes of standard treatment in adult patients with acute asthma exacerbation in the ED.

Methods: This was a single-centre, triple-blind, randomised controlled trial conducted in the ED in Thailand between March 2022 and April 2023. Adult patients with asthma exacerbation were randomly assigned to receive either a placebo (normal saline) or HDICS (budesonide 9000 µg) nebulisation combined with beta agonist and ipratropium within the first hour. The primary endpoints were length of ED stay, hospital admission and ED revisit. The secondary endpoints were dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay and home exacerbation after ED discharge.

Results: A total of 88 patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups: 44 patients received a HDICS and 44 patients were placed in the control group. The HDICS group had a significantly shorter ED length of stay (adjusted mean difference -133.6 min; 95% CI -242.4 to -24.8 min; p=0.016), and a higher proportion of ED discharged home within 8 and 16 hours compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in hospital admission rates, ED revisit, dyspnoea scale, pulmonary functions, length of hospital stay or home exacerbation after ED discharge.

Conclusions: HDICS may be useful as an add-on therapy to standard treatment for asthma exacerbation in adults to reduce ED stay.

Trial registration number: TCTR20201214001.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Journal
Emergency Medicine Journal 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.50%
发文量
262
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Emergency Medicine Journal is a leading international journal reporting developments and advances in emergency medicine and acute care. It has relevance to all specialties involved in the management of emergencies in the hospital and prehospital environment. Each issue contains editorials, reviews, original research, evidence based reviews, letters and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信