Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant治疗CDK4/6抑制进展的晚期乳腺癌:来自III期后君主试验的结果

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-20 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1200/JCO-24-02086
Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander
{"title":"Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant治疗CDK4/6抑制进展的晚期乳腺癌:来自III期后君主试验的结果","authors":"Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal <i>P</i> = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal <i>P</i> < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without <i>ESR1</i> or <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% <i>v</i> 7%; nominal <i>P</i> = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1112"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal <i>P</i> = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal <i>P</i> < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without <i>ESR1</i> or <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% <i>v</i> 7%; nominal <i>P</i> = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1101-1112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02086\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)联合内分泌治疗(ET)是激素受体阳性(HR+),人表皮生长因子受体2阴性(HER2-)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的标准一线治疗方法;然而,几乎所有患者都会出现疾病进展,需要额外的治疗方案。在此,我们报告了monarch后试验的结果,该试验调查了CDK4/6i疾病进展后,abemaciclib是否抑制CDK4/6的ET转换。方法:这项双盲、随机III期研究纳入了先前接受CDK4/6i+芳香酶抑制剂治疗的疾病进展患者,作为晚期疾病或辅助CDK4/6i+ET治疗后复发的初始治疗。患者被随机分配(1:1)到阿贝马昔布+氟维司汀组或安慰剂+氟维司汀组。主要终点是研究者评估的无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括盲法独立中心评价(BICR)的PFS、客观缓解率(ORR)和安全性。结果:本研究随机抽取368例患者(abemaciclib+氟维司汀,n=182,安慰剂+氟维司汀,n=186)。在初步分析(258个事件)时,风险比(HR)为0.73 (95% CI, 0.57-0.95;名义P=0.017), abemaciclib+氟维司汀组和安慰剂+氟维司汀组的中位PFS分别为6.0个月(95% CI, 5.6-8.6)和5.3个月(95% CI, 3.7-5.6), 6个月PFS率分别为50%和37%。bicr评估的PFS支持了这些结果(HR, 0.55;95% ci, 0.39-0.77;名义PESR1或PIK3CA突变。在可测量疾病的患者中,研究者评估的ORR与安慰剂+氟维司汀相比,abemaciclib+氟维司汀改善(17% vs 7%;名义P = 0.015)。未观察到新的安全性信号,研究结果与abemaciclib已知的安全性一致。结论:Abemaciclib+fulvestrant显著改善了HR+, HER2- ABC患者先前CDK4/6i+ET疾病进展后的PFS,为这些患者提供了额外的靶向治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.

Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.

Results: This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal P = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal P < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% v 7%; nominal P = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.

Conclusion: Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信