Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander
{"title":"Abemaciclib + Fulvestrant治疗CDK4/6抑制进展的晚期乳腺癌:来自III期后君主试验的结果","authors":"Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal <i>P</i> = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal <i>P</i> < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without <i>ESR1</i> or <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% <i>v</i> 7%; nominal <i>P</i> = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1101-1112"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Kalinsky, Giampaolo Bianchini, Erika Hamilton, Stephanie L Graff, Kyong Hwa Park, Rinath Jeselsohn, Umut Demirci, Miguel Martin, Rachel M Layman, Sara A Hurvitz, Sarah Sammons, Peter A Kaufman, Montserrat Muñoz, Jiun-I Lai, Holly Knoderer, Cynthia Sandoval, Aarti R Chawla, Bastien Nguyen, Yanhong Zhou, Elizabeth Ravenberg, Lacey M Litchfield, Lillian Smyth, Seth A Wander\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/JCO-24-02086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal <i>P</i> = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal <i>P</i> < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without <i>ESR1</i> or <i>PIK3CA</i> mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% <i>v</i> 7%; nominal <i>P</i> = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1101-1112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02086\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Advanced Breast Cancer After Progression on CDK4/6 Inhibition: Results From the Phase III postMONARCH Trial.
Purpose: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC); however, disease progression occurs in almost all patients and additional treatment options are needed. Herein, we report outcomes of the postMONARCH trial investigating a switch in ET with/without CDK4/6 inhibition with abemaciclib after disease progression on CDK4/6i.
Methods: This double-blind, randomized phase III study enrolled patients with disease progression on previous CDK4/6i plus aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy for advanced disease or recurrence on/after adjuvant CDK4/6i + ET. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to abemaciclib + fulvestrant or placebo + fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included PFS by blinded independent central review, objective response rate (ORR), and safety.
Results: This study randomly assigned 368 patients (abemaciclib + fulvestrant, n = 182 placebo + fulvestrant, n = 186). At the primary analysis (258 events), the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.95; nominal P = .017), with median PFS 6.0 (95% CI, 5.6 to 8.6) versus 5.3 (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.6) months and 6-month PFS rates of 50% and 37% in the abemaciclib + fulvestrant and placebo + fulvestrant arms, respectively. These results were supported by BICR-assessed PFS (HR, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77]; nominal P < .001). A consistent treatment effect was seen across major clinical and genomic subgroups, including with/without ESR1 or PIK3CA mutations. Among patients with measurable disease, investigator-assessed ORR was improved with abemaciclib + fulvestrant versus placebo + fulvestrant (17% v 7%; nominal P = .015). No new safety signals were observed, with findings consistent with the known safety profile of abemaciclib.
Conclusion: Abemaciclib + fulvestrant significantly improved PFS after disease progression on previous CDK4/6i + ET in patients with HR+, HER2- ABC, offering an additional targeted therapy option for these patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.