优先考虑儿童并将其纳入部门间决策:揭示加纳对变革的免疫力。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Leonie Akofio-Sowah, Maria Lisa Soraghan, Srivatsan Rajagopalan, Kwame S Sakyi, Aku Kwamie, Bethany Jennings, Florence Ayisi Quartey, Isabella Sagoe-Moses, Prince Owusu, Sarah L Dalglish
{"title":"优先考虑儿童并将其纳入部门间决策:揭示加纳对变革的免疫力。","authors":"Leonie Akofio-Sowah, Maria Lisa Soraghan, Srivatsan Rajagopalan, Kwame S Sakyi, Aku Kwamie, Bethany Jennings, Florence Ayisi Quartey, Isabella Sagoe-Moses, Prince Owusu, Sarah L Dalglish","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite strong commitments to improving children's well-being, nearly a third of Ghanaian children aged 36-59 months are not developmentally on track, with additional challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Improvements in children's health and well-being rely on effective intersectoral policies, however, not enough is known about how to achieve this in practice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We report on a case study of participatory intersectoral policymaking for child health in Ghana in 2021, feeding into the national Early Childhood Care and Development Policy. We used systematic methods to analyse policy documents from 22 Ministries, Departments and Agencies; procedural outputs from national policy convenings; and children's inputs via a national competition, worksheets at a policy convening and video interviews. Data sources were analysed separately using content analysis for real-time application of findings into the policy process. Subsequently, data were re-analysed together, using an 'insider-outsider' approach, to provide a holistic view of the policy process. Beyond traditional child-centred policy areas (ie, health, education, youth and sports, social protection), most ministries lacked budgeted child-specific policies, partly because policymakers felt this was outside their mandate. Analysing children's inputs to the policy process showed they had substantive policy ideas on their health and well-being that were intersectoral in nature. While underlying social and cultural assumptions about children's place in society impeded their participation in policymaking, stakeholders nonetheless expressed their commitment to amplifying and institutionalising children's contributions. Our study adds evidence on how to operationalise intersectoral partnerships, including by mapping mandates, budgets and roles across different functions and levels of government, with the mobilising participation of civil society. We also report on new mechanisms for including children's perspectives in policymaking. Our findings have implications for child health policy and for other health initiatives that require effective intersectoral, participatory approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prioritising and including children in intersectoral policymaking: uncovering Immunity to Change in Ghana.\",\"authors\":\"Leonie Akofio-Sowah, Maria Lisa Soraghan, Srivatsan Rajagopalan, Kwame S Sakyi, Aku Kwamie, Bethany Jennings, Florence Ayisi Quartey, Isabella Sagoe-Moses, Prince Owusu, Sarah L Dalglish\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Despite strong commitments to improving children's well-being, nearly a third of Ghanaian children aged 36-59 months are not developmentally on track, with additional challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Improvements in children's health and well-being rely on effective intersectoral policies, however, not enough is known about how to achieve this in practice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We report on a case study of participatory intersectoral policymaking for child health in Ghana in 2021, feeding into the national Early Childhood Care and Development Policy. We used systematic methods to analyse policy documents from 22 Ministries, Departments and Agencies; procedural outputs from national policy convenings; and children's inputs via a national competition, worksheets at a policy convening and video interviews. Data sources were analysed separately using content analysis for real-time application of findings into the policy process. Subsequently, data were re-analysed together, using an 'insider-outsider' approach, to provide a holistic view of the policy process. Beyond traditional child-centred policy areas (ie, health, education, youth and sports, social protection), most ministries lacked budgeted child-specific policies, partly because policymakers felt this was outside their mandate. Analysing children's inputs to the policy process showed they had substantive policy ideas on their health and well-being that were intersectoral in nature. While underlying social and cultural assumptions about children's place in society impeded their participation in policymaking, stakeholders nonetheless expressed their commitment to amplifying and institutionalising children's contributions. Our study adds evidence on how to operationalise intersectoral partnerships, including by mapping mandates, budgets and roles across different functions and levels of government, with the mobilising participation of civil society. We also report on new mechanisms for including children's perspectives in policymaking. Our findings have implications for child health policy and for other health initiatives that require effective intersectoral, participatory approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"9 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-013251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管在改善儿童福祉方面作出了坚定承诺,但在年龄在36-59个月的加纳儿童中,有近三分之一的儿童发育未步入正轨,并面临着2019冠状病毒病大流行带来的额外挑战。儿童健康和福祉的改善取决于有效的部门间政策,然而,对于如何在实践中实现这一目标,特别是在低收入和中等收入国家,所知甚少。我们报告了2021年加纳儿童健康参与性部门间政策制定的案例研究,纳入了国家幼儿保育和发展政策。我们采用系统的方法分析了22个部委、部门和机构的政策文件;国家政策会议的程序性产出;以及孩子们通过全国竞赛、政策会议的工作表和视频采访的投入。使用内容分析对数据源进行单独分析,以便将调查结果实时应用于政策过程。随后,使用“内部-外部”方法对数据进行重新分析,以提供政策过程的整体视图。除了传统的以儿童为中心的政策领域(即卫生、教育、青年和体育、社会保护)之外,大多数部委缺乏针对儿童的预算政策,部分原因是决策者认为这超出了他们的职责范围。分析儿童对政策进程的投入表明,他们对自己的健康和福祉有实质性的跨部门政策构想。虽然关于儿童在社会中的地位的潜在社会和文化假设阻碍了他们参与决策,但利益攸关方仍表示致力于扩大和制度化儿童的贡献。我们的研究增加了如何实施跨部门伙伴关系的证据,包括在动员民间社会参与的情况下,对不同职能和各级政府的授权、预算和角色进行映射。我们还报道了将儿童观点纳入政策制定的新机制。我们的研究结果对儿童保健政策和其他需要有效的跨部门、参与性方法的保健倡议具有启示意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prioritising and including children in intersectoral policymaking: uncovering Immunity to Change in Ghana.

Despite strong commitments to improving children's well-being, nearly a third of Ghanaian children aged 36-59 months are not developmentally on track, with additional challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Improvements in children's health and well-being rely on effective intersectoral policies, however, not enough is known about how to achieve this in practice, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. We report on a case study of participatory intersectoral policymaking for child health in Ghana in 2021, feeding into the national Early Childhood Care and Development Policy. We used systematic methods to analyse policy documents from 22 Ministries, Departments and Agencies; procedural outputs from national policy convenings; and children's inputs via a national competition, worksheets at a policy convening and video interviews. Data sources were analysed separately using content analysis for real-time application of findings into the policy process. Subsequently, data were re-analysed together, using an 'insider-outsider' approach, to provide a holistic view of the policy process. Beyond traditional child-centred policy areas (ie, health, education, youth and sports, social protection), most ministries lacked budgeted child-specific policies, partly because policymakers felt this was outside their mandate. Analysing children's inputs to the policy process showed they had substantive policy ideas on their health and well-being that were intersectoral in nature. While underlying social and cultural assumptions about children's place in society impeded their participation in policymaking, stakeholders nonetheless expressed their commitment to amplifying and institutionalising children's contributions. Our study adds evidence on how to operationalise intersectoral partnerships, including by mapping mandates, budgets and roles across different functions and levels of government, with the mobilising participation of civil society. We also report on new mechanisms for including children's perspectives in policymaking. Our findings have implications for child health policy and for other health initiatives that require effective intersectoral, participatory approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信