急诊点超声的自我评估和学习动机:德国医生的在线试点调查。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joachim Bansbach, Michael Bentele, Matthias Bollinger, Stefanie Bentele, Ronny Langenhan, Bianka Gerber, Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Stefan Bushuven
{"title":"急诊点超声的自我评估和学习动机:德国医生的在线试点调查。","authors":"Joachim Bansbach, Michael Bentele, Matthias Bollinger, Stefanie Bentele, Ronny Langenhan, Bianka Gerber, Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Stefan Bushuven","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01154-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning motivation is essential to obtain and maintain ultrasound competencies in emergency medicine. One's competencies herein and the need for ongoing training are best evaluated by self-assessment. This may be flawed by overconfidence effects - the belief to be better than others or better than tests reveal. This study aims to clarify the underinvestigated interaction of learning motivation and self-assessment in emergency point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional multicenter project, physicians assessed their own and others' competence and learning motivation using the Situational Motivation Scale comprising intrinsic motivation, external and identified regulation, and amotivation. In addition, we presented eight ultrasound loops of different pathologies to emergency physicians of various specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the motivation to learn was high, while self-assessment showed no significant overconfidence in POCUS. The rate of correct diagnoses based on the loops was relatively low. As a result, we did not detect overconfidence effects in participants who completed questions (n = 86) and tests (n = 56). Overplacing oneself above peers negatively correlated with intrinsic learning motivation and identified regulation and positively correlated to amotivation. Further analyses indicated that learning motivation was associated with the interactions of the physicians' risk perception, speciality, and self-assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The absence of overconfidence effects, the complexity of learning motivation and their interaction show that prior findings in other contexts may not be easily transferable to POCUS and could be highly context-sensitive. In conclusion, this study highlights high levels of learning motivation but relatively low diagnostic accuracy in POCUS, which suggests the need for ongoing education and assessment. Ensuring that physicians continue to receive objective feedback and opportunities to refine their skills is critical for maintaining high standards of care. Despite the small sample size and other limitations of the study, the results primarily served to generate hypotheses for future research on emergency ultrasound education.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"235"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656859/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-assessment and learning motivation in emergency point-of-care ultrasound: an online pilot investigation in German physicians.\",\"authors\":\"Joachim Bansbach, Michael Bentele, Matthias Bollinger, Stefanie Bentele, Ronny Langenhan, Bianka Gerber, Milena Trifunovic-Koenig, Stefan Bushuven\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-024-01154-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Learning motivation is essential to obtain and maintain ultrasound competencies in emergency medicine. One's competencies herein and the need for ongoing training are best evaluated by self-assessment. This may be flawed by overconfidence effects - the belief to be better than others or better than tests reveal. This study aims to clarify the underinvestigated interaction of learning motivation and self-assessment in emergency point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional multicenter project, physicians assessed their own and others' competence and learning motivation using the Situational Motivation Scale comprising intrinsic motivation, external and identified regulation, and amotivation. In addition, we presented eight ultrasound loops of different pathologies to emergency physicians of various specialties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, the motivation to learn was high, while self-assessment showed no significant overconfidence in POCUS. The rate of correct diagnoses based on the loops was relatively low. As a result, we did not detect overconfidence effects in participants who completed questions (n = 86) and tests (n = 56). Overplacing oneself above peers negatively correlated with intrinsic learning motivation and identified regulation and positively correlated to amotivation. Further analyses indicated that learning motivation was associated with the interactions of the physicians' risk perception, speciality, and self-assessment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The absence of overconfidence effects, the complexity of learning motivation and their interaction show that prior findings in other contexts may not be easily transferable to POCUS and could be highly context-sensitive. In conclusion, this study highlights high levels of learning motivation but relatively low diagnostic accuracy in POCUS, which suggests the need for ongoing education and assessment. Ensuring that physicians continue to receive objective feedback and opportunities to refine their skills is critical for maintaining high standards of care. Despite the small sample size and other limitations of the study, the results primarily served to generate hypotheses for future research on emergency ultrasound education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656859/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01154-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01154-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:学习动机是获得和保持急诊医学超声能力的必要条件。一个人在这里的能力和持续培训的需要最好通过自我评估来评估。这可能会受到过度自信效应的影响——相信自己比别人好,或者比测试显示的要好。本研究旨在探讨急诊点超声(POCUS)中学习动机与自我评估的相互作用。方法:在本横断面多中心项目中,医生使用情境动机量表评估自己和他人的能力和学习动机,该量表包括内在动机、外部和识别调节以及动机。此外,我们还向不同专科的急诊医师介绍了8种不同病理的超声环路。结果:总体而言,学生的学习动机较高,自我评价未见明显的过度自信。基于环路的正确诊断率相对较低。因此,在完成问题(n = 86)和测试(n = 56)的参与者中,我们没有发现过度自信的影响。自我超越与内在学习动机、认同调节负相关,与动机正相关。进一步的分析表明,学习动机与医生的风险认知、专业和自我评估的相互作用有关。讨论:过度自信效应的缺失、学习动机的复杂性及其相互作用表明,先前在其他情境中的发现可能不容易转移到POCUS中,并且可能具有高度的情境敏感性。总之,本研究强调了POCUS的高水平学习动机,但相对较低的诊断准确性,这表明需要持续的教育和评估。确保医生继续获得客观反馈和改进技能的机会对于维持高水准的护理至关重要。尽管本研究样本量小,存在其他局限性,但研究结果主要是为今后急诊超声教育的研究提供假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-assessment and learning motivation in emergency point-of-care ultrasound: an online pilot investigation in German physicians.

Introduction: Learning motivation is essential to obtain and maintain ultrasound competencies in emergency medicine. One's competencies herein and the need for ongoing training are best evaluated by self-assessment. This may be flawed by overconfidence effects - the belief to be better than others or better than tests reveal. This study aims to clarify the underinvestigated interaction of learning motivation and self-assessment in emergency point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS).

Methods: In this cross-sectional multicenter project, physicians assessed their own and others' competence and learning motivation using the Situational Motivation Scale comprising intrinsic motivation, external and identified regulation, and amotivation. In addition, we presented eight ultrasound loops of different pathologies to emergency physicians of various specialties.

Results: Overall, the motivation to learn was high, while self-assessment showed no significant overconfidence in POCUS. The rate of correct diagnoses based on the loops was relatively low. As a result, we did not detect overconfidence effects in participants who completed questions (n = 86) and tests (n = 56). Overplacing oneself above peers negatively correlated with intrinsic learning motivation and identified regulation and positively correlated to amotivation. Further analyses indicated that learning motivation was associated with the interactions of the physicians' risk perception, speciality, and self-assessment.

Discussion: The absence of overconfidence effects, the complexity of learning motivation and their interaction show that prior findings in other contexts may not be easily transferable to POCUS and could be highly context-sensitive. In conclusion, this study highlights high levels of learning motivation but relatively low diagnostic accuracy in POCUS, which suggests the need for ongoing education and assessment. Ensuring that physicians continue to receive objective feedback and opportunities to refine their skills is critical for maintaining high standards of care. Despite the small sample size and other limitations of the study, the results primarily served to generate hypotheses for future research on emergency ultrasound education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信