中度二尖瓣反流与室间隔缺损相关的儿童:是否需要二尖瓣修复?

IF 0.9 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-15 DOI:10.4103/apc.apc_110_24
Hao Siang Ong, Sivakumar Krishnasamy, Retnagowri Rajandram, Asthika Amirthalingam, Tengku Nazim Tengku Yusof, Sivakumar Sivalingam
{"title":"中度二尖瓣反流与室间隔缺损相关的儿童:是否需要二尖瓣修复?","authors":"Hao Siang Ong, Sivakumar Krishnasamy, Retnagowri Rajandram, Asthika Amirthalingam, Tengku Nazim Tengku Yusof, Sivakumar Sivalingam","doi":"10.4103/apc.apc_110_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of ventricular septal defect (VSD) alongside mitral regurgitation (MR) in pediatric patients remains a contentious issue due to the intricacies of cardiac surgery and the need to minimize ischemic time. Despite observations of MR regression following VSD closure, definitive guidelines for this patient subset are lacking, particularly concerning the management of the subgroup of patients with moderate MR. The objective of the study is to explore the factors influencing the choice between surgical intervention and conservative management for the mitral valve (MV) in VSD patients with moderate MR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from January 2000 to December 2015, we analyzed management trends and focused on 53 patients with both VSD and moderate MR. This cohort was subdivided into four groups: first by their MV pathology, and then stratified by the receipt of intervention towards the diseased MV. Our primary goal was to identify correlations, especially concerning surgical outcomes such as mortality and need for re-operation. Statistical significance is determined when the P value is lower than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no notable differences in preoperative variables across four cohort groups, apart from the cross-clamp duration which was longest in Group B intervention. Outcome analysis showed survival rates that were higher in cohort groups that underwent intervention toward the disease MV regardless of existing MV morphology, although results were not statistically significant. Cox model analysis found no correlation between the cohort groups and postoperative outcomes, but cross-clamp duration significantly correlated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of VSD with moderate MR with associated pathologies of the valvular apparatus, opting for MV repair (MVr) appears to improve survival outcomes without significantly increasing postoperative morbidity. Similarly, for patients with moderate MR and isolated annular dilatation, surgical MVr is observed to have better survival trend compared to the control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8026,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"264-271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moderate mitral regurgitation in association with ventricular septal defect in children: Does it warrant mitral valve repair?\",\"authors\":\"Hao Siang Ong, Sivakumar Krishnasamy, Retnagowri Rajandram, Asthika Amirthalingam, Tengku Nazim Tengku Yusof, Sivakumar Sivalingam\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/apc.apc_110_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of ventricular septal defect (VSD) alongside mitral regurgitation (MR) in pediatric patients remains a contentious issue due to the intricacies of cardiac surgery and the need to minimize ischemic time. Despite observations of MR regression following VSD closure, definitive guidelines for this patient subset are lacking, particularly concerning the management of the subgroup of patients with moderate MR. The objective of the study is to explore the factors influencing the choice between surgical intervention and conservative management for the mitral valve (MV) in VSD patients with moderate MR.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from January 2000 to December 2015, we analyzed management trends and focused on 53 patients with both VSD and moderate MR. This cohort was subdivided into four groups: first by their MV pathology, and then stratified by the receipt of intervention towards the diseased MV. Our primary goal was to identify correlations, especially concerning surgical outcomes such as mortality and need for re-operation. Statistical significance is determined when the P value is lower than 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no notable differences in preoperative variables across four cohort groups, apart from the cross-clamp duration which was longest in Group B intervention. Outcome analysis showed survival rates that were higher in cohort groups that underwent intervention toward the disease MV regardless of existing MV morphology, although results were not statistically significant. Cox model analysis found no correlation between the cohort groups and postoperative outcomes, but cross-clamp duration significantly correlated with mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In cases of VSD with moderate MR with associated pathologies of the valvular apparatus, opting for MV repair (MVr) appears to improve survival outcomes without significantly increasing postoperative morbidity. Similarly, for patients with moderate MR and isolated annular dilatation, surgical MVr is observed to have better survival trend compared to the control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"264-271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651405/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_110_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/11/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Pediatric Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/apc.apc_110_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于心脏手术的复杂性和缩短缺血时间的需要,室间隔缺损(VSD)和二尖瓣反流(MR)在儿科患者中的处理仍然是一个有争议的问题。尽管观察到室间隔缺损关闭后的MR回归,但缺乏针对这一患者亚组的明确指南,特别是关于中度MR患者亚组的管理。本研究的目的是探讨影响中度MR室间隔缺损患者二尖瓣(MV)手术干预和保守管理选择的因素。在2000年1月至2015年12月的回顾性队列研究中,我们分析了53名VSD和中度mr患者的治疗趋势,并将该队列细分为四组:首先根据他们的MV病理,然后根据接受病变MV干预的情况进行分层。我们的主要目标是确定相关性,特别是关于手术结果,如死亡率和再次手术的需要。当P值小于0.05时,判定有统计学意义。结果:除B组交叉钳夹时间最长外,4个队列组术前变量无显著差异。结果分析显示,无论是否存在MV形态,在接受MV干预的队列组中,存活率更高,尽管结果没有统计学意义。Cox模型分析发现队列组与术后结局无相关性,但交叉钳夹时间与死亡率显著相关。结论:在中度MR伴有瓣膜相关病变的室间隔缺损患者中,选择MV修复(MVr)似乎可以改善生存结果,而不会显著增加术后发病率。同样,对于中度MR和孤立性环扩张的患者,观察到手术MVr比对照组有更好的生存趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moderate mitral regurgitation in association with ventricular septal defect in children: Does it warrant mitral valve repair?

Background: The management of ventricular septal defect (VSD) alongside mitral regurgitation (MR) in pediatric patients remains a contentious issue due to the intricacies of cardiac surgery and the need to minimize ischemic time. Despite observations of MR regression following VSD closure, definitive guidelines for this patient subset are lacking, particularly concerning the management of the subgroup of patients with moderate MR. The objective of the study is to explore the factors influencing the choice between surgical intervention and conservative management for the mitral valve (MV) in VSD patients with moderate MR.

Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study from January 2000 to December 2015, we analyzed management trends and focused on 53 patients with both VSD and moderate MR. This cohort was subdivided into four groups: first by their MV pathology, and then stratified by the receipt of intervention towards the diseased MV. Our primary goal was to identify correlations, especially concerning surgical outcomes such as mortality and need for re-operation. Statistical significance is determined when the P value is lower than 0.05.

Results: There were no notable differences in preoperative variables across four cohort groups, apart from the cross-clamp duration which was longest in Group B intervention. Outcome analysis showed survival rates that were higher in cohort groups that underwent intervention toward the disease MV regardless of existing MV morphology, although results were not statistically significant. Cox model analysis found no correlation between the cohort groups and postoperative outcomes, but cross-clamp duration significantly correlated with mortality.

Conclusions: In cases of VSD with moderate MR with associated pathologies of the valvular apparatus, opting for MV repair (MVr) appears to improve survival outcomes without significantly increasing postoperative morbidity. Similarly, for patients with moderate MR and isolated annular dilatation, surgical MVr is observed to have better survival trend compared to the control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology
Annals of Pediatric Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信