基于研究生课程的化学教育研究经验:描述与调查化学研究生对冒名顶替现象的感知相关的一般模型和项目结果

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Slade C. McAfee, Allison R. Tomczyk-Schauer, Leah E. Johnson Kempinski, Tori C. Williamson and Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez*, 
{"title":"基于研究生课程的化学教育研究经验:描述与调查化学研究生对冒名顶替现象的感知相关的一般模型和项目结果","authors":"Slade C. McAfee,&nbsp;Allison R. Tomczyk-Schauer,&nbsp;Leah E. Johnson Kempinski,&nbsp;Tori C. Williamson and Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0092210.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >With the movement toward engaging students in authentic science practices, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are becoming more common across fields such as chemistry; however, one of the challenges with CUREs is they are necessarily context-specific, operating under the constraints of a faculty’s research interests and the laboratory equipment available in a department. This limitation prevents the development of a general model for a CURE that could be taken and adapted by researchers across universities. As an alternative to benchtop research, discipline-based education research (DBER) provides the flexibility to make significant modifications to the scope of a project investigated without impacting the resources needed to conduct the study. To this end, this article provides an overview of a course-based chemistry education research experience that involved graduate students learning about and then applying qualitative research methods. Although contextualized using graduate students, chemistry education research, and qualitative research methods, we emphasize the general nature of this course, which provides a model that could be readily adapted to other contexts or education levels (e.g., a “DBER CURE”). As a proof-of-concept, project outcomes related to the study designed by the graduate students in the course (the first four authors) are presented, highlighting the methodological decisions made and how the course informed the investigation of chemistry graduate students’ perceptions related to the imposter phenomenon.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 12","pages":"5334–5344 5334–5344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Graduate-Course-Based Chemistry Education Research Experience: Describing a General Model and the Project Outcomes Related to Investigating Chemistry Graduate Students’ Perceptions of the Imposter Phenomenon\",\"authors\":\"Slade C. McAfee,&nbsp;Allison R. Tomczyk-Schauer,&nbsp;Leah E. Johnson Kempinski,&nbsp;Tori C. Williamson and Jon-Marc G. Rodriguez*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0092210.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >With the movement toward engaging students in authentic science practices, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are becoming more common across fields such as chemistry; however, one of the challenges with CUREs is they are necessarily context-specific, operating under the constraints of a faculty’s research interests and the laboratory equipment available in a department. This limitation prevents the development of a general model for a CURE that could be taken and adapted by researchers across universities. As an alternative to benchtop research, discipline-based education research (DBER) provides the flexibility to make significant modifications to the scope of a project investigated without impacting the resources needed to conduct the study. To this end, this article provides an overview of a course-based chemistry education research experience that involved graduate students learning about and then applying qualitative research methods. Although contextualized using graduate students, chemistry education research, and qualitative research methods, we emphasize the general nature of this course, which provides a model that could be readily adapted to other contexts or education levels (e.g., a “DBER CURE”). As a proof-of-concept, project outcomes related to the study designed by the graduate students in the course (the first four authors) are presented, highlighting the methodological decisions made and how the course informed the investigation of chemistry graduate students’ perceptions related to the imposter phenomenon.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"101 12\",\"pages\":\"5334–5344 5334–5344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00922\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00922","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着让学生参与真正的科学实践的运动,基于课程的本科生研究经历(CUREs)在化学等领域变得越来越普遍;然而,cure面临的挑战之一是它们必须针对具体情况,在教师的研究兴趣和部门可用的实验室设备的限制下运行。这一限制阻碍了CURE通用模型的发展,这种模型可以被各大学的研究人员采用和调整。作为台式研究的替代方案,基于学科的教育研究(DBER)提供了灵活性,可以对所调查项目的范围进行重大修改,而不会影响进行研究所需的资源。为此,本文概述了一项基于课程的化学教育研究经验,涉及研究生学习并应用定性研究方法。虽然使用研究生,化学教育研究和定性研究方法进行情境化,但我们强调这门课程的一般性质,它提供了一个可以很容易地适应其他背景或教育水平的模型(例如,“DBER CURE”)。作为概念验证,介绍了与该课程研究生(前四位作者)设计的研究相关的项目结果,突出了所做的方法决定,以及该课程如何告知化学研究生对冒名顶替现象的看法的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Graduate-Course-Based Chemistry Education Research Experience: Describing a General Model and the Project Outcomes Related to Investigating Chemistry Graduate Students’ Perceptions of the Imposter Phenomenon

A Graduate-Course-Based Chemistry Education Research Experience: Describing a General Model and the Project Outcomes Related to Investigating Chemistry Graduate Students’ Perceptions of the Imposter Phenomenon

With the movement toward engaging students in authentic science practices, course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) are becoming more common across fields such as chemistry; however, one of the challenges with CUREs is they are necessarily context-specific, operating under the constraints of a faculty’s research interests and the laboratory equipment available in a department. This limitation prevents the development of a general model for a CURE that could be taken and adapted by researchers across universities. As an alternative to benchtop research, discipline-based education research (DBER) provides the flexibility to make significant modifications to the scope of a project investigated without impacting the resources needed to conduct the study. To this end, this article provides an overview of a course-based chemistry education research experience that involved graduate students learning about and then applying qualitative research methods. Although contextualized using graduate students, chemistry education research, and qualitative research methods, we emphasize the general nature of this course, which provides a model that could be readily adapted to other contexts or education levels (e.g., a “DBER CURE”). As a proof-of-concept, project outcomes related to the study designed by the graduate students in the course (the first four authors) are presented, highlighting the methodological decisions made and how the course informed the investigation of chemistry graduate students’ perceptions related to the imposter phenomenon.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信