利用潘朵拉扫天观测为机场附近NO2卫星检索提供信息

Asher P. Mouat, Elena Spinei and Jennifer Kaiser*, 
{"title":"利用潘朵拉扫天观测为机场附近NO2卫星检索提供信息","authors":"Asher P. Mouat,&nbsp;Elena Spinei and Jennifer Kaiser*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0015810.1021/acsestair.4c00158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Airports are a large and growing source of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>. Tracking airport-related emissions is especially difficult, as a portion of emissions are elevated above the surface. While satellite-based NO<sub>2</sub> observations show hot-spots near airports, near-source retrievals often have large biases related to uncertainties in the NO<sub>2</sub> vertical distribution and resultant air mass factors (AMF). Here we use observations from UV–vis spectrometers (Pandora 1S, SciGlob) deployed near the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International airport from April 2020–May 2021 to assess the impact of aviation on NO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles. We show the first near-airport sky-scanning Pandora observations, which are used to distinguish the airport plume from the urban background. We find that increasing aviation leads to higher NO<sub>2</sub> over the airport, and the enhancement is distributed across the mixed layer near-equally. We compare observed profiles with those modeled by the Goddard Earth Observing System composition forecast (GEOS-CF) system. We find that modeled profiles attribute a larger portion of the column closer to the surface and underestimate the NO<sub>2</sub> mixing height. Observed profiles typically exhibited greater NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations up to 2.5 km above ground level. Air mass factors (AMF) calculated using observations (AMF<sub>Fused</sub>) are similar over Hartsfield-Jackson to those calculated using GEOS-CF (AMF<sub>GEOS-CF</sub>). The unexpected similarity in alternative AMFs is attributed to the altitude-dependent sensitivity of AMF<sub>Fused</sub> to changes in NO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Using either AMF<sub>Fused</sub> or AMF<sub>GEOS-CF</sub> to evaluate TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> against independent direct-sun observations produces consistent normalized mean differences of −22% and −29%, respectively. Overall, these results demonstrate the benefits of a combined ground and satellite-based approach for probing a complex distribution of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in an urban area.</p><p >Observational constraints on airport-related emissions are limited. We use 3D observations from the Pandora instrument to map the near-airport NO<sub>2</sub> enhancement and discuss implications of discrepancies in measured and modeled NO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles for interpretation of satellite-based observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"1 12","pages":"1617–1628 1617–1628"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Informing Near-Airport Satellite NO2 Retrievals Using Pandora Sky-Scanning Observations\",\"authors\":\"Asher P. Mouat,&nbsp;Elena Spinei and Jennifer Kaiser*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acsestair.4c0015810.1021/acsestair.4c00158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >Airports are a large and growing source of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>. Tracking airport-related emissions is especially difficult, as a portion of emissions are elevated above the surface. While satellite-based NO<sub>2</sub> observations show hot-spots near airports, near-source retrievals often have large biases related to uncertainties in the NO<sub>2</sub> vertical distribution and resultant air mass factors (AMF). Here we use observations from UV–vis spectrometers (Pandora 1S, SciGlob) deployed near the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International airport from April 2020–May 2021 to assess the impact of aviation on NO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles. We show the first near-airport sky-scanning Pandora observations, which are used to distinguish the airport plume from the urban background. We find that increasing aviation leads to higher NO<sub>2</sub> over the airport, and the enhancement is distributed across the mixed layer near-equally. We compare observed profiles with those modeled by the Goddard Earth Observing System composition forecast (GEOS-CF) system. We find that modeled profiles attribute a larger portion of the column closer to the surface and underestimate the NO<sub>2</sub> mixing height. Observed profiles typically exhibited greater NO<sub>2</sub> concentrations up to 2.5 km above ground level. Air mass factors (AMF) calculated using observations (AMF<sub>Fused</sub>) are similar over Hartsfield-Jackson to those calculated using GEOS-CF (AMF<sub>GEOS-CF</sub>). The unexpected similarity in alternative AMFs is attributed to the altitude-dependent sensitivity of AMF<sub>Fused</sub> to changes in NO<sub>2</sub> concentration. Using either AMF<sub>Fused</sub> or AMF<sub>GEOS-CF</sub> to evaluate TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> against independent direct-sun observations produces consistent normalized mean differences of −22% and −29%, respectively. Overall, these results demonstrate the benefits of a combined ground and satellite-based approach for probing a complex distribution of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in an urban area.</p><p >Observational constraints on airport-related emissions are limited. We use 3D observations from the Pandora instrument to map the near-airport NO<sub>2</sub> enhancement and discuss implications of discrepancies in measured and modeled NO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles for interpretation of satellite-based observations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"volume\":\"1 12\",\"pages\":\"1617–1628 1617–1628\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS ES&T Air\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机场是氮氧化物的一个巨大且不断增长的来源。追踪与机场相关的排放量尤其困难,因为一部分排放量高于地面。虽然基于卫星的NO2观测显示机场附近的热点,但近源反演通常存在较大偏差,这与NO2垂直分布和由此产生的气团因子(AMF)的不确定性有关。本文利用2020年4月至2021年5月部署在亚特兰大哈茨菲尔德-杰克逊国际机场附近的紫外-可见光谱仪(Pandora 1S, SciGlob)的观测结果,评估了航空对二氧化氮垂直剖面的影响。我们展示了第一次近机场的天空扫描潘多拉观测,它被用来区分机场羽流和城市背景。研究发现,航空量的增加会导致机场上空NO2的增加,并且这种增加在混合层上的分布几乎是均匀的。我们将观测到的剖面与戈达德地球观测系统成分预报(GEOS-CF)系统模拟的剖面进行了比较。我们发现,模拟的剖面将柱的大部分归因于靠近表面,而低估了NO2的混合高度。观测到的剖面在地面以上2.5公里处通常显示出更高的NO2浓度。在Hartsfield-Jackson上空,使用观测(AMFFused)计算的气团因子(AMF)与使用GEOS-CF (AMFGEOS-CF)计算的气团因子(AMF)相似。替代AMFs的意外相似性归因于AMFs对NO2浓度变化的海拔依赖性敏感性。使用AMFFused或AMFGEOS-CF评估TROPOMI NO2与独立的太阳直射观测结果的归一化平均差异分别为- 22%和- 29%。总的来说,这些结果证明了地面和卫星相结合的方法在探测城市地区氮氧化物排放的复杂分布方面的好处。与机场有关的排放的观测限制是有限的。我们使用潘多拉仪器的三维观测来绘制机场附近NO2增强的地图,并讨论测量和模拟的NO2垂直剖面差异对卫星观测解释的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Informing Near-Airport Satellite NO2 Retrievals Using Pandora Sky-Scanning Observations

Airports are a large and growing source of NOx. Tracking airport-related emissions is especially difficult, as a portion of emissions are elevated above the surface. While satellite-based NO2 observations show hot-spots near airports, near-source retrievals often have large biases related to uncertainties in the NO2 vertical distribution and resultant air mass factors (AMF). Here we use observations from UV–vis spectrometers (Pandora 1S, SciGlob) deployed near the Atlanta Hartsfield-Jackson International airport from April 2020–May 2021 to assess the impact of aviation on NO2 vertical profiles. We show the first near-airport sky-scanning Pandora observations, which are used to distinguish the airport plume from the urban background. We find that increasing aviation leads to higher NO2 over the airport, and the enhancement is distributed across the mixed layer near-equally. We compare observed profiles with those modeled by the Goddard Earth Observing System composition forecast (GEOS-CF) system. We find that modeled profiles attribute a larger portion of the column closer to the surface and underestimate the NO2 mixing height. Observed profiles typically exhibited greater NO2 concentrations up to 2.5 km above ground level. Air mass factors (AMF) calculated using observations (AMFFused) are similar over Hartsfield-Jackson to those calculated using GEOS-CF (AMFGEOS-CF). The unexpected similarity in alternative AMFs is attributed to the altitude-dependent sensitivity of AMFFused to changes in NO2 concentration. Using either AMFFused or AMFGEOS-CF to evaluate TROPOMI NO2 against independent direct-sun observations produces consistent normalized mean differences of −22% and −29%, respectively. Overall, these results demonstrate the benefits of a combined ground and satellite-based approach for probing a complex distribution of NOx emissions in an urban area.

Observational constraints on airport-related emissions are limited. We use 3D observations from the Pandora instrument to map the near-airport NO2 enhancement and discuss implications of discrepancies in measured and modeled NO2 vertical profiles for interpretation of satellite-based observations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信