Mads Lerche, Anders Borup, Samuel J Callaghan, Matthew Buckthorpe
{"title":"青少年精英足球运动员经过八周力量或负重训练后对变向能力的适应性。","authors":"Mads Lerche, Anders Borup, Samuel J Callaghan, Matthew Buckthorpe","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2433454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of plyometric (PT) or strength (ST) training on change of direction (COD) performance at two differing angles among highly trained youth footballers. Seventy-one national-level youth football players (14.6 ± 1.8 years) were randomly allocated to either an 8-week, twice weekly, plyometric (PT) or strength training (ST) group. Pre- and post-intervention testing consisted of measures of COD performance at 45 and 180º, as well as maximal strength assessed via Trap Bar Deadlift 5RM (TBD5RM) and reactive strength index (RSI) from a 40 cm drop jump, respectively. Changes from pre- to post-testing were assessed via mixed ANOVAs (<i>p</i> ≤ .05) and effect sizes. Both training groups improved TBD5RM (PT = 7.8%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.32. ST = 6.9%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.28) and RSI (PT = 15.9%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.59. ST = 15.6%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.64) measures. Significant improvement in 45° COD performance was found for both training groups (PT = 4.0%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = -0.68. ST = 3.6%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = -0.61), whilst neither group improved at 180° (PT = 0.8%, <i>p</i> = .192, ES = -0.17. ST = 0.8%, <i>p</i> = .282, ES = -0.23). No significant differences in changes were found between training groups. Both PT and ST were effective at enhancing maximal and explosive strength as well as COD performance measured at shallow angles. Neither method enhanced the sharp angle COD performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptations to Change of Direction Ability After Eight Weeks of Strength or Plyometric Training in Elite Youth Football Players.\",\"authors\":\"Mads Lerche, Anders Borup, Samuel J Callaghan, Matthew Buckthorpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2024.2433454\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of plyometric (PT) or strength (ST) training on change of direction (COD) performance at two differing angles among highly trained youth footballers. Seventy-one national-level youth football players (14.6 ± 1.8 years) were randomly allocated to either an 8-week, twice weekly, plyometric (PT) or strength training (ST) group. Pre- and post-intervention testing consisted of measures of COD performance at 45 and 180º, as well as maximal strength assessed via Trap Bar Deadlift 5RM (TBD5RM) and reactive strength index (RSI) from a 40 cm drop jump, respectively. Changes from pre- to post-testing were assessed via mixed ANOVAs (<i>p</i> ≤ .05) and effect sizes. Both training groups improved TBD5RM (PT = 7.8%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.32. ST = 6.9%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.28) and RSI (PT = 15.9%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.59. ST = 15.6%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = 0.64) measures. Significant improvement in 45° COD performance was found for both training groups (PT = 4.0%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = -0.68. ST = 3.6%, <i>p</i> < .001, ES = -0.61), whilst neither group improved at 180° (PT = 0.8%, <i>p</i> = .192, ES = -0.17. ST = 0.8%, <i>p</i> = .282, ES = -0.23). No significant differences in changes were found between training groups. Both PT and ST were effective at enhancing maximal and explosive strength as well as COD performance measured at shallow angles. Neither method enhanced the sharp angle COD performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2433454\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2433454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在探讨增强训练(PT)或力量训练(ST)对高训练青少年足球运动员在两个不同角度的方向改变(COD)表现的影响。71名国家级青少年足球运动员(14.6±1.8岁)随机分为8周、每周2次的增强训练(PT)组和力量训练(ST)组。干预前和干预后的测试包括在45°和180°下测量COD性能,以及分别通过陷阱杆Deadlift 5RM (TBD5RM)和反应强度指数(RSI)评估40 cm落差时的最大强度。通过混合方差分析(p≤0.05)和效应量评估检测前后的变化。两组TBD5RM均有改善(PT = 7.8%, p p p p p p p)。192, es = -0.17。ST = 0.8%, p =。282, es = -0.23)。各组之间的变化没有显著差异。PT和ST都能有效地提高最大强度和爆炸强度以及浅角度下的COD性能。两种方法均不能提高尖角COD性能。
Adaptations to Change of Direction Ability After Eight Weeks of Strength or Plyometric Training in Elite Youth Football Players.
This study aimed to investigate the effects of plyometric (PT) or strength (ST) training on change of direction (COD) performance at two differing angles among highly trained youth footballers. Seventy-one national-level youth football players (14.6 ± 1.8 years) were randomly allocated to either an 8-week, twice weekly, plyometric (PT) or strength training (ST) group. Pre- and post-intervention testing consisted of measures of COD performance at 45 and 180º, as well as maximal strength assessed via Trap Bar Deadlift 5RM (TBD5RM) and reactive strength index (RSI) from a 40 cm drop jump, respectively. Changes from pre- to post-testing were assessed via mixed ANOVAs (p ≤ .05) and effect sizes. Both training groups improved TBD5RM (PT = 7.8%, p < .001, ES = 0.32. ST = 6.9%, p < .001, ES = 0.28) and RSI (PT = 15.9%, p < .001, ES = 0.59. ST = 15.6%, p < .001, ES = 0.64) measures. Significant improvement in 45° COD performance was found for both training groups (PT = 4.0%, p < .001, ES = -0.68. ST = 3.6%, p < .001, ES = -0.61), whilst neither group improved at 180° (PT = 0.8%, p = .192, ES = -0.17. ST = 0.8%, p = .282, ES = -0.23). No significant differences in changes were found between training groups. Both PT and ST were effective at enhancing maximal and explosive strength as well as COD performance measured at shallow angles. Neither method enhanced the sharp angle COD performance.