Ana Luisa Correia, Ana Rita Silva, Filipe Mira, Rui Pinto, Emanuel Ferreira, Maria Guedes Marques, Catarina Romãozinho, Rui Alves
{"title":"动静脉瘘成熟的预测因素:前瞻性研究","authors":"Ana Luisa Correia, Ana Rita Silva, Filipe Mira, Rui Pinto, Emanuel Ferreira, Maria Guedes Marques, Catarina Romãozinho, Rui Alves","doi":"10.1111/hdi.13193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure remains common despite preoperative ultrasound mapping. Identifying predictive biomarkers can help anticipate primary failure and reducing invasive procedures. Our study aimed to identify clinical and analytical risk factors for primary AVF failure or delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study (October 2022-March 2023) included adult patients scheduled for AVF creation. In all patients, a preoperative ultrasound mapping was conducted and AVF maturation assessed at least 6 weeks post-surgery. Clinical, analytical, and demographic data were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Eighty patients were included, 62.5% male, and mean age 66.3 years. For distal anastomosis, preoperative vein (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mm; p 0.002) and supply artery (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3 mm; p 0.001) diameters were significant factors impacting primary failure. Also, for proximal anastomosis, the artery diameter (2.4 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4 mm; p 0.01) had an impact on AVF maturation. ROC curves established for distal AVF a vein diameter cutoff of 3.25 mm (AUC 77.2%) and artery cut-off of 2.35 mm (AUC 74.6%) and for proximal AVF an artery cutoff of 2.25 mm (AUC 76.5%). Distal AVF creation correlated with higher primary failure risk (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the primary failure rate and the presence of central venous catheter or serum results. In a sub analysis, we found that patients with central venous catheter had higher levels of inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation, ultrasound mapping, and careful AVF site selection. Recognizing vein and artery diameter thresholds for optimal outcomes is crucial. Avoiding central venous catheters in suitable patients can positively impact AVF results.</p>","PeriodicalId":94027,"journal":{"name":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","volume":" ","pages":"24-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive factors for arteriovenous fistula maturation: A prospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Luisa Correia, Ana Rita Silva, Filipe Mira, Rui Pinto, Emanuel Ferreira, Maria Guedes Marques, Catarina Romãozinho, Rui Alves\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hdi.13193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure remains common despite preoperative ultrasound mapping. Identifying predictive biomarkers can help anticipate primary failure and reducing invasive procedures. Our study aimed to identify clinical and analytical risk factors for primary AVF failure or delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective study (October 2022-March 2023) included adult patients scheduled for AVF creation. In all patients, a preoperative ultrasound mapping was conducted and AVF maturation assessed at least 6 weeks post-surgery. Clinical, analytical, and demographic data were collected.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Eighty patients were included, 62.5% male, and mean age 66.3 years. For distal anastomosis, preoperative vein (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mm; p 0.002) and supply artery (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3 mm; p 0.001) diameters were significant factors impacting primary failure. Also, for proximal anastomosis, the artery diameter (2.4 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4 mm; p 0.01) had an impact on AVF maturation. ROC curves established for distal AVF a vein diameter cutoff of 3.25 mm (AUC 77.2%) and artery cut-off of 2.35 mm (AUC 74.6%) and for proximal AVF an artery cutoff of 2.25 mm (AUC 76.5%). Distal AVF creation correlated with higher primary failure risk (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the primary failure rate and the presence of central venous catheter or serum results. In a sub analysis, we found that patients with central venous catheter had higher levels of inflammatory markers.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation, ultrasound mapping, and careful AVF site selection. Recognizing vein and artery diameter thresholds for optimal outcomes is crucial. Avoiding central venous catheters in suitable patients can positively impact AVF results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"24-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13193\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hemodialysis international. International Symposium on Home Hemodialysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.13193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导读:尽管术前超声定位,动静脉瘘(AVF)成熟失败仍然很常见。识别预测性生物标志物可以帮助预测原发性衰竭,减少侵入性手术。我们的研究旨在确定原发性AVF衰竭或延迟的临床和分析危险因素。方法:一项前瞻性研究(2022年10月至2023年3月)纳入了计划进行AVF创建的成年患者。对所有患者进行术前超声定位,并在术后至少6周评估AVF成熟度。收集临床、分析和人口统计数据。结果:纳入80例患者,男性62.5%,平均年龄66.3岁。远端吻合,术前静脉(3.8±1.2 vs 2.8±0.6 mm);P 0.002)和供血动脉(2.5±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.3 mm);P 0.001)直径是影响初次失效的重要因素。对于近端吻合,动脉直径(2.4±0.4 vs. 2.0±0.4 mm;p 0.01)对AVF成熟有影响。建立了远端AVF的ROC曲线,静脉直径切断3.25 mm (AUC 77.2%),动脉切断2.35 mm (AUC 74.6%),近端AVF的动脉切断2.25 mm (AUC 76.5%)。讨论:我们的研究强调了术前评估、超声定位和仔细选择AVF部位的重要性。识别最佳结果的静脉和动脉直径阈值至关重要。在合适的患者中避免中心静脉导管可以积极影响AVF结果。
Predictive factors for arteriovenous fistula maturation: A prospective study.
Introduction: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) maturation failure remains common despite preoperative ultrasound mapping. Identifying predictive biomarkers can help anticipate primary failure and reducing invasive procedures. Our study aimed to identify clinical and analytical risk factors for primary AVF failure or delay.
Methods: A prospective study (October 2022-March 2023) included adult patients scheduled for AVF creation. In all patients, a preoperative ultrasound mapping was conducted and AVF maturation assessed at least 6 weeks post-surgery. Clinical, analytical, and demographic data were collected.
Findings: Eighty patients were included, 62.5% male, and mean age 66.3 years. For distal anastomosis, preoperative vein (3.8 ± 1.2 vs. 2.8 ± 0.6 mm; p 0.002) and supply artery (2.5 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.3 mm; p 0.001) diameters were significant factors impacting primary failure. Also, for proximal anastomosis, the artery diameter (2.4 ± 0.4 vs. 2.0 ± 0.4 mm; p 0.01) had an impact on AVF maturation. ROC curves established for distal AVF a vein diameter cutoff of 3.25 mm (AUC 77.2%) and artery cut-off of 2.35 mm (AUC 74.6%) and for proximal AVF an artery cutoff of 2.25 mm (AUC 76.5%). Distal AVF creation correlated with higher primary failure risk (p < 0.001). No correlation was found between the primary failure rate and the presence of central venous catheter or serum results. In a sub analysis, we found that patients with central venous catheter had higher levels of inflammatory markers.
Discussion: Our study highlights the importance of preoperative evaluation, ultrasound mapping, and careful AVF site selection. Recognizing vein and artery diameter thresholds for optimal outcomes is crucial. Avoiding central venous catheters in suitable patients can positively impact AVF results.