印度梅加拉亚邦社区保护区的面积和树冠特征决定了灵长类动物的栖息地,以及对保护灵长类动物的影响。

IF 1.2 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Sanyukta P Kasbekar, Honnavalli N Kumara, Siddhesh Sitaram Bhor, S Babu, P V Karunakaran
{"title":"印度梅加拉亚邦社区保护区的面积和树冠特征决定了灵长类动物的栖息地,以及对保护灵长类动物的影响。","authors":"Sanyukta P Kasbekar, Honnavalli N Kumara, Siddhesh Sitaram Bhor, S Babu, P V Karunakaran","doi":"10.1163/14219980-bja10045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, the effective protected area network is one of the last resorts for conserving biodiversity. The nature of protected areas depends on the land ownership of the respective countries including India. The landholding in the northeastern states of India remains with native people, thus, 'Community Reserve' (CR) was introduced in 2003. Considering the high number of CR in Meghalaya that are home to many threatened primates, understanding their role in conserving the primates was crucial. We conducted day and night trail surveys in 32 CR of Meghalaya, and a questionnaire survey of local people for their perception of primates. We sampled basal area, tree density, canopy cover, canopy height, bamboo density, and human activity in each CR to test their influence on the occupancy of primates. We recorded the Western hoolock gibbon Hoolock hoolock, capped langur Trachypithecus pileatus, Northern pig-tailed macaque Macaca leonina, Assamese macaque Macaca assamensis, Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta, and Bengal slow loris Nycticebus bengalensis. The primate richness and abundance were higher in the CR of Garo Hills than in the Khasi and Jaintia Hills. The gibbons had the highest patch occupancy, which was followed by capped langur, Assamese macaque, and pig-tailed macaque. Large-sized CR determined the occupancy of gibbons and Assamese macaques. Canopy cover positively influenced the occupancy of three primates except the Assamese macaque, whereas the canopy height had a positive association with three species of primates. The basal area, and tree density, negatively affected the occurrence of Assamese macaque, northern pig-tailed macaque, and capped langur. Macaques were the most hunted primates. The differential occurrence and abundance in different hill systems may be due to hunting and habitat size rather than habitat quality. Habitat restoration would improve the habitat quality with the involvement of communities to assist in retaining and avoiding the local extinction of primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50437,"journal":{"name":"Folia Primatologica","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Size and canopy characteristics of community reserves determine primate occupancy in the state of Meghalaya, India, and implications for its conservation.\",\"authors\":\"Sanyukta P Kasbekar, Honnavalli N Kumara, Siddhesh Sitaram Bhor, S Babu, P V Karunakaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/14219980-bja10045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Globally, the effective protected area network is one of the last resorts for conserving biodiversity. The nature of protected areas depends on the land ownership of the respective countries including India. The landholding in the northeastern states of India remains with native people, thus, 'Community Reserve' (CR) was introduced in 2003. Considering the high number of CR in Meghalaya that are home to many threatened primates, understanding their role in conserving the primates was crucial. We conducted day and night trail surveys in 32 CR of Meghalaya, and a questionnaire survey of local people for their perception of primates. We sampled basal area, tree density, canopy cover, canopy height, bamboo density, and human activity in each CR to test their influence on the occupancy of primates. We recorded the Western hoolock gibbon Hoolock hoolock, capped langur Trachypithecus pileatus, Northern pig-tailed macaque Macaca leonina, Assamese macaque Macaca assamensis, Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta, and Bengal slow loris Nycticebus bengalensis. The primate richness and abundance were higher in the CR of Garo Hills than in the Khasi and Jaintia Hills. The gibbons had the highest patch occupancy, which was followed by capped langur, Assamese macaque, and pig-tailed macaque. Large-sized CR determined the occupancy of gibbons and Assamese macaques. Canopy cover positively influenced the occupancy of three primates except the Assamese macaque, whereas the canopy height had a positive association with three species of primates. The basal area, and tree density, negatively affected the occurrence of Assamese macaque, northern pig-tailed macaque, and capped langur. Macaques were the most hunted primates. The differential occurrence and abundance in different hill systems may be due to hunting and habitat size rather than habitat quality. Habitat restoration would improve the habitat quality with the involvement of communities to assist in retaining and avoiding the local extinction of primates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Folia Primatologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Folia Primatologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/14219980-bja10045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia Primatologica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/14219980-bja10045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,有效的保护区网络是保护生物多样性的最后手段之一。保护区的性质取决于包括印度在内的各个国家的土地所有权。印度东北部各邦的土地仍归土著居民所有,因此,2003年引入了“社区保护区”(CR)。考虑到梅加拉亚邦是许多濒危灵长类动物的家园,了解它们在保护灵长类动物中的作用至关重要。我们在梅加拉亚邦的32个邦进行了昼夜跟踪调查,并对当地人对灵长类动物的看法进行了问卷调查。研究了各生境的基面积、乔木密度、冠层盖度、冠层高度、竹密度和人类活动对灵长类动物占用率的影响。记录了西部长臂猿hoolock hoolock,帽叶猴Trachypithecus pileatus,北方长尾猕猴Macaca leonina,阿萨姆猕猴Macaca assamensis,恒河猴Macaca mulatta和孟加拉慢猴Nycticebus bengalensis。灵长类动物的丰富度和丰度在加罗山的CR中高于卡西和耆那亚山。长臂猿的斑块占用率最高,其次是叶猴、阿萨姆猕猴和长尾猕猴。大型CR确定了长臂猿和阿萨姆猕猴的占用率。冠层覆盖度对除阿萨姆猕猴外的3种灵长类动物的占用率均有显著影响,而冠层高度对3种灵长类动物的占用率均有显著影响。基底面积和树木密度对阿萨姆猕猴、北方长尾猕猴和叶猴的发生有不利影响。猕猴是最容易被猎杀的灵长类动物。在不同的山地系统中,发生和丰度的差异可能是由于狩猎和生境大小而不是生境质量。生境恢复将通过社区的参与来改善生境质量,以帮助保留和避免灵长类动物的局部灭绝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Size and canopy characteristics of community reserves determine primate occupancy in the state of Meghalaya, India, and implications for its conservation.

Globally, the effective protected area network is one of the last resorts for conserving biodiversity. The nature of protected areas depends on the land ownership of the respective countries including India. The landholding in the northeastern states of India remains with native people, thus, 'Community Reserve' (CR) was introduced in 2003. Considering the high number of CR in Meghalaya that are home to many threatened primates, understanding their role in conserving the primates was crucial. We conducted day and night trail surveys in 32 CR of Meghalaya, and a questionnaire survey of local people for their perception of primates. We sampled basal area, tree density, canopy cover, canopy height, bamboo density, and human activity in each CR to test their influence on the occupancy of primates. We recorded the Western hoolock gibbon Hoolock hoolock, capped langur Trachypithecus pileatus, Northern pig-tailed macaque Macaca leonina, Assamese macaque Macaca assamensis, Rhesus macaque Macaca mulatta, and Bengal slow loris Nycticebus bengalensis. The primate richness and abundance were higher in the CR of Garo Hills than in the Khasi and Jaintia Hills. The gibbons had the highest patch occupancy, which was followed by capped langur, Assamese macaque, and pig-tailed macaque. Large-sized CR determined the occupancy of gibbons and Assamese macaques. Canopy cover positively influenced the occupancy of three primates except the Assamese macaque, whereas the canopy height had a positive association with three species of primates. The basal area, and tree density, negatively affected the occurrence of Assamese macaque, northern pig-tailed macaque, and capped langur. Macaques were the most hunted primates. The differential occurrence and abundance in different hill systems may be due to hunting and habitat size rather than habitat quality. Habitat restoration would improve the habitat quality with the involvement of communities to assist in retaining and avoiding the local extinction of primates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Folia Primatologica
Folia Primatologica 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Recognizing that research in human biology must be founded on a comparative knowledge of our closest relatives, this journal is the natural scientist''s ideal means of access to the best of current primate research. ''Folia Primatologica'' covers fields as diverse as molecular biology and social behaviour, and features articles on ecology, conservation, palaeontology, systematics and functional anatomy. In-depth articles and invited reviews are contributed by the world’s leading primatologists. In addition, special issues provide rapid peer-reviewed publication of conference proceedings. ''Folia Primatologica'' is one of the top-rated primatology publications and is acknowledged worldwide as a high-impact core journal for primatologists, zoologists and anthropologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信