在血管闭塞性危象患者中使用氯胺酮的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-11-25 DOI:10.1002/jha2.1050
Ernesto Calderon Martinez, Stephin Zachariah Saji, Thomas Campos Carmona, Vaidarshi Abbagoni, Mohammad Salman, Mishell Estefanía Llerena Vargas, Suchita Mylavarapu, Druvini Fernando, Lakshmi Sheethal Arvapalli, Nathalia Schettino Samad, Nithin Karnan, Camila Sanchez Cruz
{"title":"在血管闭塞性危象患者中使用氯胺酮的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Ernesto Calderon Martinez,&nbsp;Stephin Zachariah Saji,&nbsp;Thomas Campos Carmona,&nbsp;Vaidarshi Abbagoni,&nbsp;Mohammad Salman,&nbsp;Mishell Estefanía Llerena Vargas,&nbsp;Suchita Mylavarapu,&nbsp;Druvini Fernando,&nbsp;Lakshmi Sheethal Arvapalli,&nbsp;Nathalia Schettino Samad,&nbsp;Nithin Karnan,&nbsp;Camila Sanchez Cruz","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by acute episodes called vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). VOC is marked by severe pain due to blocked blood vessels by sickled cells. Ketamine has been reported to be effective and safe in managing VOC in SCD patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives/methods</h3>\n \n <p>This review aims to determine ketamine's safety and efficacy through analysis of clinical trials and observational studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis systematically searched seven databases on May 20, 2024 for randomized control trials (RCT), cohorts, and case–control studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Five studies with 689 participants met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of two studies (518 observations) for the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score showed no significant difference, with a standardized mean difference (MD) of 0.23 (95% CI: −0.13 to 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.21, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). For morphine milligram equivalent (MME), a meta-analysis of two studies (344 observations) resulted in an MD of −0.03 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.45, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97%). However, the side effects analysis from four studies (608 observations) showed a significantly higher relative risk (RR) of 5.74 (95% CI: 2.80–11.79, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) for mild side effects, including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Ketamine qualitative synthesis shows potential for improving pain management in SCD patients during VOC, but without statistically significant differences in pain reduction. It is associated with increased mild side effects, though no severe adverse events were reported. Further research is needed to increase the sample size and power of the analysis to clarify optimal dosing and administration protocols for ketamine in this context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"5 6","pages":"1312-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of ketamine use in patients with vaso-occlusive crisis: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Ernesto Calderon Martinez,&nbsp;Stephin Zachariah Saji,&nbsp;Thomas Campos Carmona,&nbsp;Vaidarshi Abbagoni,&nbsp;Mohammad Salman,&nbsp;Mishell Estefanía Llerena Vargas,&nbsp;Suchita Mylavarapu,&nbsp;Druvini Fernando,&nbsp;Lakshmi Sheethal Arvapalli,&nbsp;Nathalia Schettino Samad,&nbsp;Nithin Karnan,&nbsp;Camila Sanchez Cruz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jha2.1050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by acute episodes called vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). VOC is marked by severe pain due to blocked blood vessels by sickled cells. Ketamine has been reported to be effective and safe in managing VOC in SCD patients.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives/methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This review aims to determine ketamine's safety and efficacy through analysis of clinical trials and observational studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis systematically searched seven databases on May 20, 2024 for randomized control trials (RCT), cohorts, and case–control studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Five studies with 689 participants met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of two studies (518 observations) for the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score showed no significant difference, with a standardized mean difference (MD) of 0.23 (95% CI: −0.13 to 0.59, <i>p</i> = 0.21, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%). For morphine milligram equivalent (MME), a meta-analysis of two studies (344 observations) resulted in an MD of −0.03 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.45, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 97%). However, the side effects analysis from four studies (608 observations) showed a significantly higher relative risk (RR) of 5.74 (95% CI: 2.80–11.79, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001, <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%) for mild side effects, including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ketamine qualitative synthesis shows potential for improving pain management in SCD patients during VOC, but without statistically significant differences in pain reduction. It is associated with increased mild side effects, though no severe adverse events were reported. Further research is needed to increase the sample size and power of the analysis to clarify optimal dosing and administration protocols for ketamine in this context.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJHaem\",\"volume\":\"5 6\",\"pages\":\"1312-1321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJHaem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Safety and efficacy of ketamine use in patients with vaso-occlusive crisis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Safety and efficacy of ketamine use in patients with vaso-occlusive crisis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is characterized by acute episodes called vaso-occlusive crises (VOC). VOC is marked by severe pain due to blocked blood vessels by sickled cells. Ketamine has been reported to be effective and safe in managing VOC in SCD patients.

Objectives/methods

This review aims to determine ketamine's safety and efficacy through analysis of clinical trials and observational studies.

Methods

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review and meta-analysis systematically searched seven databases on May 20, 2024 for randomized control trials (RCT), cohorts, and case–control studies.

Results

Five studies with 689 participants met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of two studies (518 observations) for the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain score showed no significant difference, with a standardized mean difference (MD) of 0.23 (95% CI: −0.13 to 0.59, p = 0.21, I2 = 0%). For morphine milligram equivalent (MME), a meta-analysis of two studies (344 observations) resulted in an MD of −0.03 (95% CI: −0.09 to 0.04, p = 0.45, I2 = 97%). However, the side effects analysis from four studies (608 observations) showed a significantly higher relative risk (RR) of 5.74 (95% CI: 2.80–11.79, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) for mild side effects, including nausea, vomiting, and dizziness.

Conclusion

Ketamine qualitative synthesis shows potential for improving pain management in SCD patients during VOC, but without statistically significant differences in pain reduction. It is associated with increased mild side effects, though no severe adverse events were reported. Further research is needed to increase the sample size and power of the analysis to clarify optimal dosing and administration protocols for ketamine in this context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信