心脏手术中手术团队熟悉程度与安全和效率结果之间关系的多中心分析。

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tyler M Bauer, Allison M Janda, Xiaoting Wu, Carol Ling, Douglas C Shook, Gabriela Querejeta-Roca, Kenneth G Shann, Trevor Smith, Michael R Mathis, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Thoralf M Sundt, Robert B Schonberger, Steven D Harrington, Roger D Dias, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky, Steven Yule
{"title":"心脏手术中手术团队熟悉程度与安全和效率结果之间关系的多中心分析。","authors":"Tyler M Bauer, Allison M Janda, Xiaoting Wu, Carol Ling, Douglas C Shook, Gabriela Querejeta-Roca, Kenneth G Shann, Trevor Smith, Michael R Mathis, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Thoralf M Sundt, Robert B Schonberger, Steven D Harrington, Roger D Dias, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky, Steven Yule","doi":"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safety in cardiac surgical procedures is predicated on effective team dynamics. This study associated operative team familiarity (ie, the extent of clinical collaboration among surgical team members) with procedural efficiency and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adjudicated patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional STS adult cardiac surgery registry and electronic health record data from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated across 3 quaternary hospitals. Team familiarity was defined as the mean number of cardiac operations performed by surgeon-anesthesiologist, surgeon-perfusionist, and anesthesiologist-perfusionist dyads within 1 year of the operation. The primary outcomes were (1) safety, measured by the STS' composite major morbidity and operative mortality measure, and (2) procedural efficiency, assessed by cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Team familiarity was stratified by terciles (low, moderate, and high) for crude analyses and analyzed continuously for adjusted analyses. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the association between team familiarity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Team familiarity was calculated for 13 581 operations. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 64 (55-72) years, and 31.9% (4328/13 581) were women. Terciles of team familiarity were defined as low (<6.00 average shared operations), moderate (6.00-9.67), and high (>9.67). Teams in lower terciles had higher observed STS morbidity and mortality rates (low, 17.9%; moderate, 18.0%; high, 16.0%; <i>P</i>=0.02) and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass duration (low, 137 minutes; moderate, 131 minutes; high, 118 minutes; <i>P</i><0.001). After risk adjustment, team familiarity was not significantly associated with STS morbidity and mortality (estimate, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.998 to 0.997]) but was inversely associated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration (estimate, -2.02 minutes per 1 unit increase in team familiarity [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.75]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased team familiarity was not associated with STS morbidity and mortality but was inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration, demonstrating potential benefit. Interventions aimed at improving team familiarity among operative teams may increase procedural efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":49221,"journal":{"name":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"17 12","pages":"e011065"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654451/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Analysis of the Relationship Between Operative Team Familiarity and Safety and Efficiency Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Tyler M Bauer, Allison M Janda, Xiaoting Wu, Carol Ling, Douglas C Shook, Gabriela Querejeta-Roca, Kenneth G Shann, Trevor Smith, Michael R Mathis, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Thoralf M Sundt, Robert B Schonberger, Steven D Harrington, Roger D Dias, Francis D Pagani, Donald S Likosky, Steven Yule\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Safety in cardiac surgical procedures is predicated on effective team dynamics. This study associated operative team familiarity (ie, the extent of clinical collaboration among surgical team members) with procedural efficiency and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adjudicated patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Institutional STS adult cardiac surgery registry and electronic health record data from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated across 3 quaternary hospitals. Team familiarity was defined as the mean number of cardiac operations performed by surgeon-anesthesiologist, surgeon-perfusionist, and anesthesiologist-perfusionist dyads within 1 year of the operation. The primary outcomes were (1) safety, measured by the STS' composite major morbidity and operative mortality measure, and (2) procedural efficiency, assessed by cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Team familiarity was stratified by terciles (low, moderate, and high) for crude analyses and analyzed continuously for adjusted analyses. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the association between team familiarity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Team familiarity was calculated for 13 581 operations. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 64 (55-72) years, and 31.9% (4328/13 581) were women. Terciles of team familiarity were defined as low (<6.00 average shared operations), moderate (6.00-9.67), and high (>9.67). Teams in lower terciles had higher observed STS morbidity and mortality rates (low, 17.9%; moderate, 18.0%; high, 16.0%; <i>P</i>=0.02) and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass duration (low, 137 minutes; moderate, 131 minutes; high, 118 minutes; <i>P</i><0.001). After risk adjustment, team familiarity was not significantly associated with STS morbidity and mortality (estimate, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.998 to 0.997]) but was inversely associated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration (estimate, -2.02 minutes per 1 unit increase in team familiarity [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.75]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased team familiarity was not associated with STS morbidity and mortality but was inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration, demonstrating potential benefit. Interventions aimed at improving team familiarity among operative teams may increase procedural efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"17 12\",\"pages\":\"e011065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654451/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/12/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.124.011065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心脏外科手术的安全性取决于有效的团队动力学。这项研究将手术团队的熟悉程度(即手术团队成员之间的临床合作程度)与手术效率和胸外科医生协会(STS)判定的患者结果联系起来。方法:对3家四级医院2014年至2021年的机构STS成人心脏手术登记和电子健康记录数据进行评估。团队熟悉度定义为手术后1年内由外科麻醉师、外科灌注师和麻醉师-灌注师二人组进行心脏手术的平均次数。主要结局是(1)安全性,通过STS的主要发病率和手术死亡率综合指标来衡量;(2)手术效率,通过体外循环时间来评估。团队熟悉度通过等级(低、中、高)对原始分析进行分层,并对调整后的分析进行连续分析。采用多变量logistic和线性回归模型来评估团队熟悉度与结果之间的关系。结果:计算了13 581例手术的团队熟悉度。患者年龄中位数(四分位数间距)为64岁(55-72岁),31.9%(4328/13 581)为女性。团队熟悉度定义为低(9.67)。较低级别的团队观察到的STS发病率和死亡率较高(低,17.9%;温和,18.0%;高,16.0%;P=0.02)和更长的中位体外循环时间(低,137分钟;中度,131分钟;高,118分钟;结论:团队熟悉度的增加与STS发病率和死亡率无关,但与体外循环时间呈负相关,显示出潜在的益处。旨在提高手术团队之间的团队熟悉度的干预措施可以提高手术效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Analysis of the Relationship Between Operative Team Familiarity and Safety and Efficiency Outcomes in Cardiac Surgery.

Background: Safety in cardiac surgical procedures is predicated on effective team dynamics. This study associated operative team familiarity (ie, the extent of clinical collaboration among surgical team members) with procedural efficiency and Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adjudicated patient outcomes.

Methods: Institutional STS adult cardiac surgery registry and electronic health record data from 2014 to 2021 were evaluated across 3 quaternary hospitals. Team familiarity was defined as the mean number of cardiac operations performed by surgeon-anesthesiologist, surgeon-perfusionist, and anesthesiologist-perfusionist dyads within 1 year of the operation. The primary outcomes were (1) safety, measured by the STS' composite major morbidity and operative mortality measure, and (2) procedural efficiency, assessed by cardiopulmonary bypass duration. Team familiarity was stratified by terciles (low, moderate, and high) for crude analyses and analyzed continuously for adjusted analyses. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to assess the association between team familiarity and outcomes.

Results: Team familiarity was calculated for 13 581 operations. The median (interquartile range) patient age was 64 (55-72) years, and 31.9% (4328/13 581) were women. Terciles of team familiarity were defined as low (<6.00 average shared operations), moderate (6.00-9.67), and high (>9.67). Teams in lower terciles had higher observed STS morbidity and mortality rates (low, 17.9%; moderate, 18.0%; high, 16.0%; P=0.02) and longer median cardiopulmonary bypass duration (low, 137 minutes; moderate, 131 minutes; high, 118 minutes; P<0.001). After risk adjustment, team familiarity was not significantly associated with STS morbidity and mortality (estimate, -0.001 [95% CI, -0.998 to 0.997]) but was inversely associated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration (estimate, -2.02 minutes per 1 unit increase in team familiarity [95% CI, -2.30 to -1.75]).

Conclusions: Increased team familiarity was not associated with STS morbidity and mortality but was inversely correlated with cardiopulmonary bypass duration, demonstrating potential benefit. Interventions aimed at improving team familiarity among operative teams may increase procedural efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
Circulation-Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
357
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, an American Heart Association journal, publishes articles related to improving cardiovascular health and health care. Content includes original research, reviews, and case studies relevant to clinical decision-making and healthcare policy. The online-only journal is dedicated to furthering the mission of promoting safe, effective, efficient, equitable, timely, and patient-centered care. Through its articles and contributions, the journal equips you with the knowledge you need to improve clinical care and population health, and allows you to engage in scholarly activities of consequence to the health of the public. Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes considers the following types of articles: Original Research Articles, Data Reports, Methods Papers, Cardiovascular Perspectives, Care Innovations, Novel Statistical Methods, Policy Briefs, Data Visualizations, and Caregiver or Patient Viewpoints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信