复杂肾结石单点多穿刺仰卧(SMS) PCNL术:一个切口,为什么要多切口?

IF 1.4 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Paksi Satyagraha, Reza Amorga, Taufiq Nur Budaya
{"title":"复杂肾结石单点多穿刺仰卧(SMS) PCNL术:一个切口,为什么要多切口?","authors":"Paksi Satyagraha, Reza Amorga, Taufiq Nur Budaya","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2024.13156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was introduced in 1976, it has been the standard procedure for large renal stones. Over time, the PCNL technique changed and developed into various techniques. We introduce single-site multipuncture supine (SMS) PCNL to give a cosmetic advantage due to less tissue injury in complex renal stones. This study aimed to determine the outcome of SMS PCNL procedure in patients with complex renal stones diseases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective study including all patients with kidney stones who had undergone SMS PCNL at the Urology Department of Saiful Anwar General Hospital from March 2019 until December 2022. All SMS PCNL procedures were performed by a single operator. The patients were divided into three groups that included that were treated with 2, 3, and 4 punctures. The data were collected using SPSS ver. 25.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ninety-three patients were included in this study. The characteristics of the patient, such as gender, age, and BMI, were not significantly different among the groups. The outcome of the SMS PCNL procedure showed a low complication rate during operation in 2-,3-, and 4-puncture groups (3.2%, 7.4%, and 0%, respectively). The Stone Free Rate (SFR) showed no significant difference between the 3 groups (p = 0.496). The SFR was 85.7% in 2-puncture, 77.8% in 3-puncture, 66.7% in 4-puncture group. The AUC of Guy's Stone Score with cut-off value was 3.5 (AUC = 0.549, p-value = 0.541, CI 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-Site Multi Puncture PCNL is a safe and efficient approach to complex renal stones. Single-Site Multipunctures Supine PCNL is comparable with other techniques of PCNL and gives minimal tissue injury that would benefit for cosmetic.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":"96 4","pages":"13156"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single site multi puncture supine (SMS) PCNL procedure in patient with complex renal stone: One incision, why should more?\",\"authors\":\"Paksi Satyagraha, Reza Amorga, Taufiq Nur Budaya\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/aiua.2024.13156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was introduced in 1976, it has been the standard procedure for large renal stones. Over time, the PCNL technique changed and developed into various techniques. We introduce single-site multipuncture supine (SMS) PCNL to give a cosmetic advantage due to less tissue injury in complex renal stones. This study aimed to determine the outcome of SMS PCNL procedure in patients with complex renal stones diseases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective study including all patients with kidney stones who had undergone SMS PCNL at the Urology Department of Saiful Anwar General Hospital from March 2019 until December 2022. All SMS PCNL procedures were performed by a single operator. The patients were divided into three groups that included that were treated with 2, 3, and 4 punctures. The data were collected using SPSS ver. 25.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Ninety-three patients were included in this study. The characteristics of the patient, such as gender, age, and BMI, were not significantly different among the groups. The outcome of the SMS PCNL procedure showed a low complication rate during operation in 2-,3-, and 4-puncture groups (3.2%, 7.4%, and 0%, respectively). The Stone Free Rate (SFR) showed no significant difference between the 3 groups (p = 0.496). The SFR was 85.7% in 2-puncture, 77.8% in 3-puncture, 66.7% in 4-puncture group. The AUC of Guy's Stone Score with cut-off value was 3.5 (AUC = 0.549, p-value = 0.541, CI 95%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-Site Multi Puncture PCNL is a safe and efficient approach to complex renal stones. Single-Site Multipunctures Supine PCNL is comparable with other techniques of PCNL and gives minimal tissue injury that would benefit for cosmetic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"volume\":\"96 4\",\"pages\":\"13156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.13156\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2024.13156","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:自1976年引入经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)以来,它已成为大肾结石的标准手术。随着时间的推移,PCNL技术发生了变化,发展成为各种各样的技术。我们介绍单点多穿刺仰卧(SMS) PCNL给美容优势,由于较少的组织损伤复杂的肾结石。本研究旨在确定SMS PCNL手术在复杂肾结石患者中的效果。材料和方法:本研究是一项回顾性研究,包括2019年3月至2022年12月在赛弗安华总医院泌尿外科接受SMS PCNL的所有肾结石患者。所有SMS PCNL程序均由单一操作员执行。患者分为三组,分别进行2次、3次和4次穿刺治疗。数据采用SPSS统计软件收集。25.结果:本研究纳入93例患者。患者的性别、年龄、BMI等特征在两组间无显著差异。SMS PCNL手术结果显示,2、3、4穿刺组术中并发症发生率较低(分别为3.2%、7.4%和0%)。3组间结石游离率(SFR)差异无统计学意义(p = 0.496)。2次穿刺组SFR为85.7%,3次穿刺组77.8%,4次穿刺组66.7%。Guy’s Stone评分的AUC为3.5 (AUC = 0.549, p值= 0.541,CI 95%)。结论:单点多穿刺PCNL是治疗复杂肾结石安全有效的方法。仰卧式PCNL可与其他PCNL技术相媲美,并使组织损伤最小,有利于美容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single site multi puncture supine (SMS) PCNL procedure in patient with complex renal stone: One incision, why should more?

Introduction: Since percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) was introduced in 1976, it has been the standard procedure for large renal stones. Over time, the PCNL technique changed and developed into various techniques. We introduce single-site multipuncture supine (SMS) PCNL to give a cosmetic advantage due to less tissue injury in complex renal stones. This study aimed to determine the outcome of SMS PCNL procedure in patients with complex renal stones diseases.

Materials and methods: This study was a retrospective study including all patients with kidney stones who had undergone SMS PCNL at the Urology Department of Saiful Anwar General Hospital from March 2019 until December 2022. All SMS PCNL procedures were performed by a single operator. The patients were divided into three groups that included that were treated with 2, 3, and 4 punctures. The data were collected using SPSS ver. 25.

Result: Ninety-three patients were included in this study. The characteristics of the patient, such as gender, age, and BMI, were not significantly different among the groups. The outcome of the SMS PCNL procedure showed a low complication rate during operation in 2-,3-, and 4-puncture groups (3.2%, 7.4%, and 0%, respectively). The Stone Free Rate (SFR) showed no significant difference between the 3 groups (p = 0.496). The SFR was 85.7% in 2-puncture, 77.8% in 3-puncture, 66.7% in 4-puncture group. The AUC of Guy's Stone Score with cut-off value was 3.5 (AUC = 0.549, p-value = 0.541, CI 95%).

Conclusions: Single-Site Multi Puncture PCNL is a safe and efficient approach to complex renal stones. Single-Site Multipunctures Supine PCNL is comparable with other techniques of PCNL and gives minimal tissue injury that would benefit for cosmetic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信